MS letter from Tepper to Fuddy
Posted on | November 1, 2012 | 8 Comments
MS letter from Tepper to Fuddy
Category:
Comments
8 Responses to “MS letter from Tepper to Fuddy”
Leave a Reply
-
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — Indiana Trial of Obama, 2nd Copy
Evidence on Barack Obama
Obama File with Exhibits
Affidavit of Paul Irey
Obama file Exhibits 1 - 7
Obama file Exhibit 8 - Part 1
Obama file Exhibit 8 - Part 2
Obama file Exhibits 9-13
Obama file Exhibits 14-21
Request for Docs under FOIA and Emergency Motion for Reconsideration
Exhibits sent to Inspector Generals and CongressPetition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
URGENT! PLEASE SIGN PETITION TO CONGRESS
OrlyTaitzEsq.com
TAITZ REPORT
Subscribe today to stay in touch with our progress. Send this channel out to your email lists. Thank you for your support. CHANNEL (Google Plus) SUBSCRIBE TO YOUTUBE Official Facebook
Recent Posts
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available! DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling. --------- To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
Pages
- #409755 (no title)
- …Defendant Obama defaulted in Grinols et al v Obama et al
- …Grinols Subpoenas
- ..Grinols Order, Summons, TRO, Complaint
- .Affidavit of Mike Zullo
- 1. Judd v Obama
- 2. Farrar v Obama
- 3. Taitz v Sebelius
- 4. Taitz v Indiana, IN Judge Orders Trial
- 5. Taitz v Astrue
- 6. Mississippi Filed Complaint Update
- 7. Taitz Walters v Sec of State Kansas
- Videos
- Video: Orly before NH Election Committee
November 1st, 2012 @ 5:20 am
Hawaii will send the same verification letter to Tepper as they did to the moron Secretary of State in Arizona, and Tepper knows this. This document will prove NOTHING!
November 1st, 2012 @ 5:45 am
of course, a verification of forgery from a corrupt official, who released this forgery in the first place
November 1st, 2012 @ 11:00 am
Verification of information contain in the LFBC is not the same as vlidation of the existence of this exact document on file in the DOH vault in the State of Hawaii.
It also fails to require that “all” the information contained is the exact same as what is on file.
What a goof.
November 1st, 2012 @ 11:31 am
look at the picture. I need all layers, I need sceenshots of all the layers and explanation for the judge
November 7th, 2012 @ 4:00 pm
After reading Teppers letter to Fuddy it is a strange request to seek a VERIFICATION instead of a CERTIFIED COPY to be provided by Fuddy to Tepper.
If a STRONG legal position is to be maintained, why would anyone request a VERIFICATION instead of a CERTIFIED COPY which the requestor [Tepper] said that he was entitled to under Hawaii law, according to [Tepper’s] quote of the Hawaii law.
Maybe someone has the answer to the question of seeking a VERIFICATION vice a CERTIFIED COPY, where a CERTIFIED COPY would be the stronger evidentiary procedure to adhere to.
November 7th, 2012 @ 4:07 pm
A CERTIFIED COPY received by Tepper COULD hang the USURPER, because a CERTIFIED COPY presented to the court would prove a BC forgery or the lack of a CERTIFIED COPY request MUST be indicative that VALID BC is NON-EXISTANT.
If the following question is posed to the Judge… “why is it that defendant counsel DID NOT request a CERTIFIED COPY to be provided as evidence to the court,instead of a BC VERIFICATION? IS THERE INFORMATION ON THE NON-EXISTANT BC THAT WOULD PROVE THE USURPER IS NOT AN AMERICAN CITIZEN, IF A ‘CERTIFIED COPY WAS PROVIDED IN LIEU OF A VERIFICATION OF EXISTING PDF VERSIONS OF THE NON-EXISTANT BC?
November 7th, 2012 @ 4:26 pm
After posting the VERIFICATION vs CERTIFIED COPY argument…maybe the post should NOT be published… it’s your call… good luck
November 7th, 2012 @ 6:20 pm
BTW! Tepper’s brief addresses the VERIFICATION vs CERTIFIED COPY OF THE BC.
Any court could IMO abrogate the narrowed application of that Hawaii BC law due to the fact that the USURPER’s WHOLE LEGACY is being put in jeopardy…and the BC law was not put there to defend a CRIMINAL act… therefore … a CERTIFIED COPY BC should be ordered by a court.