OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

From reader Judy Whelan

Posted on | November 20, 2009 | 8 Comments

Procedure to Court Martial Barack Hussein Obama

Thursday, November 19, 2009 7:47 PM
From:
“judylwhelan

Add sender to Contacts

To:
dr_taitz@yahoo.com
From Lame Cherry Blog….don’t know how far outside the box this is but thought it worth forwarding to you.JW

 Thursday, November 19, 2009

 

The following is the Constitutional Authority for the removal for Barack Hussein Obama as the check to political balance which has been neutralized by the Legislative and Judicial in failing to uphold the Constitution.
The Constitution actually lays out quite clearly a Madison gaping hole to override a corrupt government not adhering to the said Constitution.

Article 2, Section 1, begins the process in complete context:

In case of the removal of the President from office, or of his death, resignation, or inability to discharge the powers and duties of the said office, the same shall devolve on the Vice President, and the Congress may by law provide for the case of removal, death, resignation or inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what officer shall then act as President, and such officer shall act accordingly, until the disability be removed, or a President shall be elected.

Officer in not being defined, does not preclude any legal American, which includes Officer of the United States Military, who are in effect, ever Citizen of the United States in being armed Citizens by the Second Amendment for recreation, pleasure, self defense and national defense.

Building upon this, Article 2, Congress and the American people enacted the 25th Amendment.
In section 4, the following Constitutional Law is triggered to remove a President or someone in the White House Executive.

Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.

Notice with special attention that the Amendment speaks of the principal officers of the executive, or such other body AS CONGRESS may declare by written declaration that the President is unable to discharge his duties.

To explain, the Amendment does not specify ONLY Congress, it simply gives example of the Executive or other government bodies such as Congress.

For the record, the United States military as in the armed militia citizenry or the standing military are bodies within the government of legal standing who can indeed upon meeting declare an occupant of the Oval Office unable to discharge such duties.

The meeting would in the military context, be one of Military Court Martial as set up by the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

All that is necessary is a commanding officer, as in even a retired officer, such as are being represented by Orly Taitz, to assemble other officers, who would number 3 for a Military Tribunal to hear such charges in an investigation to court martial of an occupant of the White House, as the President is the Citizen, is the armed Citizen is the Second Amendment, is the US Military.
A President is further enabled as militarily biased in giving and receiving salutes, flying on Marine One, flying on Air Force One and having his own military compound of Camp David.

A President as Commander in Chief is not a civilian head of the Executive, but a quasi military officer who often as most Presidents even dress in military apparrel.

The case of Pvt. Joshua Fry is of particular importance of the court martial of Barack Hussein Obama, as Pvt. Fry was autistic and found to have pedophilia photos. Mr. Obama has been designated suffering from several psychopathies. His Roman holiday exposed a perverse nature involving teenage girls.
All of these events equal the removal of Pvt. Fry and Mr. Obama.

Mr. Obama’s criminal acts though are much deeper in his derilection of duty, his placing Americans in deliberate harm’s way in Nidal Hasan who worked for Mr. Obama and his policy in Afghanistan not allowing US Soldiers to fire unless fired upon first in a combat situation.
In addition, Mr. Obama has been utilizing the US military as a diplomatic assassin squad in murdering “bad” terrorists while befriending “good” terrorists.

A court martial on these events once enacted by any US officer, and assembled general court martial is not subject to Congress, the Executive, Judicial nor the Military as it is an entity of last resort. It is so proven as that by James Madison‘s exact vague language and the vaggaries of the 25th Amendment which literally stipulate by not stipulating, as the 10th Amendment, that the US military reserves the right to court martial any sitting person of the Executive in it’s legal right of checks and balances.

The court martial is only 3 to 4 officers assembled, a prosecutor and a provided defense attorney for Mr. Obama.

Upon the evidence, the officers of the general court martial pass sentence from death, prison, to dishonorable discharge to bad conduct.
Once this legal Constitutional Court convicts Mr. Obama, he is immediately ineligable to occupy the White House and can be taken into custody without parole for immediate imprisonment in a military prison such as Fort Leavenworth.

Mr. Obama could not appeal to Congress nor the Courts, but only to the Court of Appeals of the Armed Forces. Only 20% of those cases though are reviewed per year.
Only if the Court of Appeals agrees may a case then be reviewed by the Supreme Court.

The entire Military Code of Justice was designed to keep political whims from supplanting justice, the code is therefore administered by officers and gentlemen.

The civilian legalites would prefer that ‘only impeachment’ can remove an Executive, but the Constitutional Law opens up vast arenas of those Citizens representing bodies within the United States proper.

Mr. Obama could be removed by court martial and once that was accomplished, no orders he would give to the military would be no longer followed, and, by Constitutional Law a convicted criminal could no longer administer the Office of the President.

The legalites would claim this does not exist in the Constitution, but in fact it does as the brilliant fail safe of the Founders Inspired by God.

Category: Letters/Feedback from Readers

Comments

8 Responses to “From reader Judy Whelan”

  1. el
    November 20th, 2009 @ 4:37 pm

    thank you!

    i would put forth that since we have not had a legitimate election and pelosi et al have colluded, the posibility should be considered to have the still Pres. Bush sit till legitimate elections can be fulfilled.

  2. ssongtan
    November 20th, 2009 @ 7:24 pm

    There is one major hurdle. The President of the United States is not subject to the UCMJ. The UCMJ was enacted in 1951 as a way to cover military discipline overseas and that there are violations that are unique to the military that are not present in civilian society; i.e, absent without leave, missing a movement, desertion, etc. Even member of the Guard pulling weekend training or there annual training are not covered under the UCMJ as at that time they are under state laws and the control of the state governor. They would have to be brought back on active duty vial official orders under Title 10 USC, to fall back under the arm of the UCMJ. The one acception is that civilians working in a combat area could be subject to the UCMJ or civilians under martial law. To my knowledge President Bush nor President Obama has declared either situation. For example the Halleburton crimes in Iraq would be tried in a federal court.

  3. susan rajchel
    November 20th, 2009 @ 10:31 pm

    My god why aren’t they enacting this, because of Gates? He is going to cause genocide on us please military get involved now!!!

  4. Pat Smare
    November 21st, 2009 @ 12:32 am

    Dr. Orly, this is such a GREAT idea. Have the Usurper-in-Chief court-martialed and tried by his own troops. (Who would be convening authority?)

    Since POTUS is CIC this would definitely work. I am sure it could be tried immediately. Who will we nominate for the honor to arrest and try Obama.

    Your posters are the most create people on the webs. In this titanic battle between good and evil. In the garden of Eden.

  5. Veritas
    November 21st, 2009 @ 1:27 am

    Dear Orly, Gut Shabbos! I tried posting excerpts of this “procedure” on Greta Wire Forum and was IMMEDIATELY blocked. It would have sparked interest and debate, albeit raucous at times. Isn’t that what DEMOCRACY is all about? Why would GRETA’s site administrator BLOCK an interpretation and exposition of the US Constitution? It is sad, and I regret not being able to any more share stories from your site on that Forum. It is a great “Shandeh” but accept their ruling as I have no other option. My thanks for your efforts to preserve Democracy, Liberty and Respect for the US Constitution. Though I do not agree with it, I will submit to GRETA FORUM’S, to my mind UNFAIR and UNBALANCED, blocking of the “procedure” thread and my subsequent banning from participating at all any more. I cry for my country! A brocheh ahf dein kop!

  6. Joseph Smegma
    November 22nd, 2009 @ 2:18 pm

    Dr. Orly,

    If they go ahead with terrorist trials in New York, we should think about a way to have The Usurper added as a defendant. My parents fled Eastern Europe to get away from the Communists and Islamist infiltrator there. We can’t let it happen here!

  7. Edward MacIsaac
    November 22nd, 2009 @ 8:58 pm

    Dear Veritas,
    I appreciate your enthusiasm,in the foundation documents of this country,Declaration of Independence, Constitution, Bill of Rights, the word Dumbocracy or any of it’s variants cannot be found.
    The only legal form of government is a republic;
    Article 4, Section 4, US Constitution.
    Thank you for your time,

  8. Peggy
    December 3rd, 2009 @ 1:32 am

    Dear Orly,

    Why are we NOT taking the route of a military tribunal as explained by Judy Whelan (https://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=6267) using the military officers you already have as clients? Please read her comment again and respond to your supporters?? I don’t know if she is an attorney, but she surely makes sense! Can we go this route??? Thanks for all you do, Orly!

    Peg