From National writers Syndicate
Posted on | October 6, 2009 | 10 Comments
| Obama/Soetoro’s Treason, Deceit and High Crime Against America |  |
 |
 |
| Written by Bridget | |
|
by Bridget Geegan Blanton Drunk with a delusional sense of authority, the American media has become the tool of a powerful and corrupt media conglomerate that calls the shots and picks the players. Public perception of the media has changed and the trust once enjoyed is now destroyed. The former ‘free press’ role of the media was hijacked long ago and what’s left is an echo chamber where dissenting voices are attacked personally instead of debated openly. In place of reporting news as it breaks in an unbiased fashion, the media promotes big government while actively suppressing newsworthy events that contradict the progressive political narrative. In other words, the media has garnered scant public trust, like its messiah, Barack Hussein Obama; a.k.a. ‘the emperor with no clothes’. Whereas the media repeats government-issued talking points regaling the resplendent aura of this self-appointed emperor, we the people see naught but naked arrogance. In order that the allusion of a ‘free press’ be maintained to a certain degree in the American market, allowances are made to facilitate the proper functioning of the pressure valve. Enough steam is released to give the allusion of ‘free speech’, but there are lines drawn in the sand that are not to be crossed under any circumstances. Untold amounts of vast wealth already invested in pre-determined outcomes prohibit the complete exercise of free speech and when breached, swift and punitive action is taken. We the people have drawn our own line in the sand and the old media is on the wrong side of it. If an issue is suppressed or dismissed with overtures of character assassination by the old media, this tells us that it’s crucial to our freedom. The old media has become nothing more than background noise. Their agenda has been exposed as a distraction tactic to keep our attention on anything except the truth. We the people have awakened. We have emerged even stronger from the frightening realization that our freedom is at stake. The single most suppressed series of newsworthy events currently in play in courtrooms across the country are the eligibility cases being brought against Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetoro. Whereas the old media along with the help of the hopelessly unhinged Left have excoriated the character of anyone who dares discuss the ‘merits’ of these legal cases; what is equally disturbing is the silence amongst conservatives on the right. Apparently, the act of speaking out on this issue is paramount to risking one’s job. A team of Louisiana-based radio talk show hosts lost their jobs after discussing Obama’s eligibility for office with World Net Daily Editor and CEO, Joseph Farah. Daniel “Spike” Harville of the “Mike and Spike Show” was told by Ruby Collins, owner of the radio station, that she was “afraid of the Obama administration sending a bunch of lawyers, the IRS and the FCC to close her down, so we needed to cool it.” G. Michael Lee also of the “Mike and Spike Show” was told to “tone down political talk” and not to mention Obama again. (source: www.wnd.com) Callers who bring up the eligibility issue on air with talk radio hosts are dismissed quickly and without further discussion. Try calling into a radio station on this issue. If your question is actually aired live, watch how fast your call is dropped. The ‘conservative’ narrative out there ranges from using the leftist-spawned moniker for supporters – “birthers” in order to downplay the issue, to the extreme of outright condemnation. Don’t assume that all conservatives hesitate to discuss Obama’s constitutional eligibility as a way to avoid ending up on the wrong side of the issue, because as an explanation, it simply does not ring true. Evidence points elsewhere, towards a campaign of intimidation that is forcing conservative ‘talkers’ to pick their battles; which isolates the eligibility issue as not being worth the trouble it ignites. In a recent round table discussion at Fox news, Ann Coulter labeled anyone concerned over Obama’s lack of natural born citizen status as a “crank” and further excoriated supporters in a vitriolic column. My advice to Governor Huckabee who also paid lip service to the eligibility slap down, is to do a little research next time beyond simply reading the Fox news memo banning further discussion. If he had, he would have learned that the initial case filed regarding Obama’s ineligible status was done so by Hillary Clinton supporter, Philip Berg. Once Clinton accepted the position as U.S. Secretary of State, Berg backed down. All I can say is that the pressure from above must really be something to shut Coulter down. Don’t allow the narrative of intimidation and humiliation, preached by the sold-out media and their sycophantic co-conspirators, to influence you. The media can’t be trusted. We’ve already seen their cards. We now understand whose cause they champion and it’s not the cause of freedom. If you’ve closed your mind to this issue, based solely on a couple of isolated comments from people whose opinions you trust, consider doing your own investigation; and remember that the eligibility discussion bas been banned from the airwaves and many people who want to speak out have been forced into silence. Enter stage right, a fearless defender of freedom, the attorney at the forefront of the eligibility issue, Dr. Orly Taitz, a.k.a. ‘Lady Liberty’. Back in March of 2009, Dr. Taitz undertook extraordinary measures just to have an opportunity to speak directly to Supreme Court Justice Roberts in order to advise him of apparent criminal sabotage inside the Supreme Court. Dr. Taitz departed her home at 3:00 am and drove to San Diego where she boarded a plane to Salt Lake City and picked up a second flight to Tacoma, Washington. From Tacoma, Dr. Taitz drove for a few more of hours to reach Moscow, Idaho to address Chief Justice Roberts during his appearance at the University. During her hard-earned moment at the microphone, Dr. Taitz informed the Chief Justice and the audience that she had submitted her case, Lightfoot v Bowen, to Roberts who agreed to hear it in the conference of all nine justices on January 23, 2009. A court clerk, Danny Bickell refused to follow established procedures in handling this case and failed to forward an important supplemental brief. Additionally, the case was erased from the docket one day after Obama’s inauguration and two days before it was supposed to be heard in the conference. Outraged citizens called the Supreme Court and demanded that it be posted to the docket. This outrage was coupled with the fact that it was erased on the very day that Obama signed an executive order sealing all of his personal records. It begs the question what exactly is he hiding? This is just the tip of the proverbial iceberg and that being said, why would anyone sacrifice their personal life, expose themselves to death threats, character assassination and survive having their automobile tampered with unless they were committed to truth, freedom and the defense of the Constitution? Dr. Taitz’ tireless, fearless pursuit of truth and justice is unparalleled in recent history. She is a true heroine and perhaps this is why she was listed at spot #6 on Obama’s hit list at Globe Magazine. What’s at the center of this fight? Why is Dr. Taitz taking on the Obama regime? During the 2008 election not a single Secretary of State in the entire nation verified the status of then candidate, Barack Hussein Obama, as eligible according to the Constitution. This negligence at the highest level could be easily rectified by producing a birth certificate, but instead Obama has elected to spend nearly a million dollars so far, fighting legal challenges in court that question his eligibility. He’d rather fight than produce true evidence of his past; not the fictional version being sold in a bookstore near you. The online appearance of a Hawaiian certificate of live birth attributed to Obama essentially states that he exists and lacks the vital information contained in an actual birth certificate. Furthermore, foreign born children can easily procure a certificate of live birth in the state of Hawaii without crucial information that can only be obtained from a hospital record. In addition, Obama’s father, a Kenyan, was a citizen of the United Kingdom at the time of Obama’s birth, as Kenya was a British Colony in 1961. In 1866, John A. Bingham, chief framer of 14th amendment wrote: “every human being born within the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of the Constitution itself, a natural born citizen.” According to Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution, “No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.” Notwithstanding the refusal to produce a true birth certificate that would settle the central issue of natural born citizenship, we are confronted with the results of an investigation regarding scores of social security numbers in connection to Obama including the most often used number attributed to a deceased Connecticut man. In addition, there have been indications of forgery associated with Obama’s selective service record. The answers to all of these mysteries remain sealed with Obama’s records. Recently, attorney Gary Kreep grabbed hold of Dr. Taitz’ coattails as legal counsel for Dr. Wiley Drake and Markham Robinson. What grabbed my attention when reading the legal briefs of both Kreep and team Obama was that both teams insinuated in court that Dr. Taitz caused unreasonable delay due to a preoccupation with irrelevant matters. By irrelevant matters both Kreep and team Obama are referring to the constitutional matter of natural born citizenship. Whose team is Kreep playing for? If I were a writer in Hollyweird, I’d cast Kreep as a ‘plant’ as he does more to hinder an expedited resolution on the merits of this constitutionally critical case than actually move it along. Then there’s the unsolved murder in connection with the improperly accessed passport information on presidential candidates Obama, Clinton and McCain. State Dept. employee Lt. Quarles Harris was cooperating with federal investigators at the time of his murder. He was found shot to death in his car in front of a D.C. church. (source: Washington Times) Some say that the violations of passport information regarding Clinton and McCain did nothing more than provide cover. Are people disappearing in connection with this case? Signing on as an active duty military plaintiff in the eligibility lawsuit carries with it a unique risk of its own. Major Stefan Frederick Cook had his orders revoked after arguing that he should not be required to serve under a President who has failed to prove his eligibility for office. Following this legal action, the Department of Defense (DOD) compelled the termination of Major Cook from his job at Simtech Inc., a private company contracted by the Defense Security Services agency of the DOD. In response, attorney for Major Cook, Orly Taitz, submitted this legal rebuttal: “A federal agency (such as the Department of Defense, acting through the Defense Security Services Agency) clearly violates the Whistleblower Protection Act if it takes or fails to take (or threatens to take or fail to take) a personnel action with respect to any employee or applicant because of any disclosure of information by the employee or applicant that he or she reasonably believes evidences a violation of a law, rule or regulation; gross mismanagement; gross waste of funds; an abuse of authority; or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety.” It suffices to say that regardless of the slippery defense tactics of the team Obama this will not go away! Our prayers go out to Lady Liberty and while you’re at it toss a few bucks in the jar at Dr. Taitz’ web-site to assist in bringing forward this case of paramount importance. Get on board and dismiss the distracting narrative pumped out by the media regarding the merits of this case. Whatever the results are following the October 5th Santa Ana, CA hearing in Judge Carter’s court room, the question of Obama’s eligibility will remain unresolved until we are shown the documents currently sealed by his own executive order. |
Comments
10 Responses to “From National writers Syndicate”
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
October 6th, 2009 @ 6:21 am
In the article by Bridget Geegan Blanton, she correctly admonishing the media for their complicit failures and celebrates the efforts of Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq., wherein she quotes John A. Bingham and Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution. However she misses an essential point regarding Bingham’s description of a natural born citizen.
“In 1866, John A. Bingham, chief framer of 14th amendment wrote: “every human being born within the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of the Constitution itself, a natural born citizen.”
…Notwithstanding the refusal to produce a true birth certificate that would settle the central issue of natural born citizenship…”
Actually even if Obama had a long form Hawaiian birth certificate that he could be compelled to produce, it would not settle the central issue of natural born citizenship.
The absence of the birth certificate only matters because it raises doubts as to whether or not Obama meets one of the two components required to be a natural born citizen.
In addition to being “born within the United States” Bingham also stated “of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty”. He purposefully used the word “parents” specifying plural or both parents.
In addition to Bingham, several other historical sources as well as the very framework of the Constitution, confirm that a natural born citizen is one born in the U.S. of U.S. citizen parents (plural).
Obama’s father was a Kenyan citizen and British subject who owed allegiance to either Kenya, England or both.
Therefore according to Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5, of the Constitution, irrespective of where Obama was born, he is not a natural born citizen and is not eligible to serve as president.
For more information regarding the correct definition of a natural born citizen relative to the U.S. Constitution, please see:
https://anaturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/
October 6th, 2009 @ 6:29 am
In the article by Bridget Geegan Blanton, she correctly admonishing the media for their complicit failures and celebrates the efforts of Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq., wherein she quotes John A. Bingham and Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution. However she misses an essential point regarding Bingham’s description of a natural born citizen.
“In 1866, John A. Bingham, chief framer of 14th amendment wrote: “every human being born within the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of the Constitution itself, a natural born citizen.”
…Not withstanding the refusal to produce a true birth certificate that would settle the central issue of natural born citizenship…”
Actually even if Obama had a long form Hawaiian birth certificate that he could be compelled to produce, it would not settle the central issue of natural born citizenship.
The absence of the birth certificate only matters because it raises doubts as to whether or not Obama meets one of the two components required to be a natural born citizen.
In addition to being “born within the United States” Bingham also stated “of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty”. He purposefully used the word “parents” specifying plural or both parents.
In addition to Bingham, several other historical sources as well as the very framework of the Constitution, confirm that a natural born citizen is one born in the U.S. of U.S. citizen parents (plural). Obama’s father was a Kenyan citizen and British subject who owed allegiance to either Kenya, England or both.
Therefore according to Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5, of the Constitution, irrespective of where Obama was born, he is not a natural born citizen and is not eligible to serve as president.
For more information regarding the correct definition of a natural born citizen relative to the U.S. Constitution, please see:
https://anaturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/
October 6th, 2009 @ 6:40 am
This is a powerful article.
If she was part of the msm, my trust would start to rebuild. However, she is only part of the blogosphere and will soon or already be labeled a disgruntled racist bordering on terrorism as labeled by our ‘vain apologist’ in chief and his thugs!
Keep up the great work and pressure Orly and Bridget!!!
October 6th, 2009 @ 6:44 am
In the article by Bridget Geegan Blanton, she correctly admonishes the media for their complicit failures and celebrates the efforts of Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq., wherein she quotes John A. Bingham and Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution. However she misses an essential point regarding Bingham’s description of a natural born citizen.
“In 1866, John A. Bingham, chief framer of 14th amendment wrote: “every human being born within the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of the Constitution itself, a natural born citizen.”
…Not withstanding the refusal to produce a true birth certificate that would settle the central issue of natural born citizenship…”
Actually even if Obama had a long form Hawaiian birth certificate that he could be compelled to produce, it would not settle the central issue of natural born citizenship. The absence of the birth certificate only matters because it raises doubts as to whether or not Obama meets one of the two components required to be a natural born citizen.
In addition to being “born within the United States” Bingham also stated “of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty”. He purposefully used the word “parents” specifying plural or both parents.
Along with Bingham, several other historical sources as well as the very framework of the Constitution, confirm that a natural born citizen is one born in the U.S. of U.S. citizen parents (plural). Obama’s father was a Kenyan citizen and British subject who owed allegiance to either Kenya, England or both.
Therefore according to Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5, of the Constitution, irrespective of where Obama was born, he is not a natural born citizen and is not eligible to serve as president.
For more information regarding the correct definition of a natural born citizen relative to the U.S. Constitution, please see:
https://anaturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/
October 6th, 2009 @ 9:01 am
DO YOU REALLY, REALLY CARE??
It is pointed out that the media is not reporting the news fairly… most people will agree, so do I. Maybe what people need to do is stop their subscriptions to those papers or Media outlets. Someone could even get a petition together for those who agree & more importantly for those who drop their subscriptions. I believe that if enough people do this & not buy their biased papers the message will go out plain & clear… One other point.
I believe our CONGRESS is completely out of touch & scared to death of the Far Left or powers to be. If any politician do NOT support the U.S. Constitution then they need to be VOTED out! No exceptions!! It is time our Gov’t officials show some backbone… & not cower under threat of the Chicago Corrupt Machine.
Yes it is time to take back our country before it is too late… we all are effected & will be effected so it is time to make your vote count. Number #1 GOAL: Any Politician who goes against the U.S.Constitution MUST go!! Maybe it is good if we start over & bring in NEW people in ALL the parties of Gov’t… THEY WORK FOR US!! Remember, your families future depends on it. God Bless us all!
October 6th, 2009 @ 9:44 am
BRAVO! Well written, true.
October 6th, 2009 @ 9:54 am
It is urgent to form a series of ‘Task Forces’ each one with a mission to present the case lobby a specific group of ‘opinion makers’.
The issue should be presented in a way very simple and short so that it can be understood easily by any citizen.
The case should then be presented to each member of the ‘opinion makers groups’ such as the Federal Lawmkers, the States’ lawmakers and the members of the media in priority. Time and ressources permitting, the exercise could be expanded to other target groups of ‘opinion makers’.
This is strictly a non partisan issue whose only objective is to discover the truth of Obama’s eliggibility, nothing but the truth.
Would anyone interested in participating please stand up and let yourself be known ?
October 6th, 2009 @ 10:00 am
Bridget, how eloquent you wrote and for putting the true story out there. Thank you for defending Dr. Orly, our Lady Liberty, and the Constitution. I pray that Judge Carter will have the guts to rule in favor of Dr. Orly and not continue to wimp out like he did yesterday in court.
In my opinion, I feel that BHO is putting off sending more troops to Afghanistan, because his decision at this time will hurt his Obamacare bill passage. He is putting our troops in harms way and his lack of action is treasonous. Obama, if you aren’t going to send more troops, then bring our military home now!
October 6th, 2009 @ 10:05 am
Bridget is picking up on Joan Swirsky’s article preceding her’s. Both write very well in excellent command of their medium–superb usuage of language–pleasure to read them.
Threats and intimidation on high, filter honest reportage. Maybe Obama wants to disinter Goebbels and yes Speer, (who avoided the hangman but his assistant did not-)
If Carter allows discovery–there is alot of pressure on the man ( The opposition simply states in a manner of speaking, that carter does not have the “standing” ( aren’t we all getting educated here in arcane legalize?)–as in not having the authority to remove a standing president–albeit a liar, thief, sell out fifth columnist ipso facto–TRAITOR!.
I realize the seriousness of all this, but I am also a sensible man and not one cheering for a team at a basketball game. Orly has to heady a sense of self in challenging and excoriating Judge Land–a very very bad error–she has been sanctioned as we all know and now instead of sensibly eating humble pie so as not to complicate and exacerbate matters, she in addition to a parthian shot which led to the sanction, now wants Land to recuse himself. Bad move again. Effectively she wants a judge who legally beat her up to get out of her way. She is an effective advocate of the eligibility stance, but NOT, repeat NOT, apower player. That starts at around $100,000,000 to get into that club. Sometimes the little guy or gal makes a rare big sweep in suits against large companies– though Bush limited awards in that area these days–but little david here is weilding a pen knife as if it is a broad sword and she has to be careful lest she receive a legal bite that rips away her law license like Michele in 1993.
Kreep is a creep, but not a dumb Creep–while orly was in georgia excoriating Land Creep responded to Carter in some capapcity as I recall. So you orly lovers and protaganists, stop watching this like a football game, there are levels of danger in the subtleties dressed in legal niceties superannuated latin phrases.
Step away and look at the muscle attacking the eligibility crisis, then weigh the response like a militray field commander weighing out and analysing the enemies strength. Don’t be stupid and don’t commit suicide by making foolish moves and rediculous comments steeped in hubris and seklf satisfaction. Orly should be kissing Lands arse in order to effectively move unencumbered into carter and don’t think that the Judge grapevine isn’t sparking with inner info–as in carter knowling what Orly said to land.
Obama’s people by what they have said and it is easy to find and read, are setting up for a Constitutional crisis perhaps by laying the seeds for invoking executive privilege.
Will they obey an order from Carter? they don’t even think carter is eligible to render such a decision–read what they say it is in plain english and professionally framed.
Ask yourself where this is all going? carter put off his decisison–why/ Maybe he will dimiss the case in favor of obama–he is a lone holdout judicially–so far!!!
He is feeling the heat–these are humans by the way and carter like anyone else standing up to Obama et al, may soon be feeling and experiencing a desert storm.
Orly bless her with all you fans rooting, has a heady sense of self. She puts all her marbles in the law and how it decides, controls and sustains events in the body politic, but she is small change in the scheme of things–she is NOT a player either influence wise or monetarily ( Though I suspect she has her little obverse of soros somewhere in the skein of money supply.
I predict delays and ambivalency as carter feels the heat and pressure build up. You can play a brilliant chess game only to have obama like hitler and lenin, just knock the pieces off the board and then tell you to screw yourself. These are big boys she is playing with –behind the scenes types–Obama is a puppet and figurehead–commonsense tells you he is nobody from nowhere, an actor playing an assigned role and a doomed and tragic character to be–and soon, making this legal war become moot. He will soon be pushed into the illusions of his own well.
The media are afraid of the Obama juggernaut plain and simple–don’t even know how to deal with these brutes and chicago ganster types–
he just issued another executive order- ( breaking records in that area). The health care–has only one object, prepping for an executive order legalizing 30,000,000 illegals who never put a penny in to SS, and this at the same time we have 15,000,000 unemployed citizens. How long do you think that will go on before the american comprssor overheats and explodes into civil war.
Look at the scenery on the stage of the larger picture, and start to focus on a small steady wave gathering more and more force so you won’t be surprised when the tsunami hits–no matter what happens to obama, there will be a massive race war and an explosive white reaction –then think Tutsi and Tutu in rwanda.
MP
October 10th, 2009 @ 7:31 pm
This is a great summary of all the main points surrounding this controversy. I intend to share it with those less focused. The fact that BHO’s issue of eligibility is taboo even for those not considered mainstream is very troubling. It seems that We the People of this great country must again stand up and fight for the truth. I am not a activist, but I know my country needs our collective voice in shedding light on the actions that are chipping away at what has always made us great. I have a child and grandchildren…that is all the reason I need to act. Being a member of the baby boomer’s it is our call to action, it is our time, it is our turn and we must do what is necessary to give forward to retain our freedom. We are the largest segment of the population and don’t think for one minute those wishing to change things don’t know it. Health care reform is about taking away our power to change course. We as a massive movement cannot let that happen.