From Brian Riley, tea party leader who brought to sheriff Arpaio a complaint from 250 citizens in regards to Obama’s use of forged IDs as the basis of his identity to run for President in AZ. after 2 years and multiple fund raisers Arpaio never submitted any criminal complaint against Obama to the District Attorney, even though through his representative Mike Zullo he declared Obama’s IDs to be a 100% forgery. Call sheriff Arpaio, demand he finally submit to the DA criminal complaint against Obama or refund to donors what he collected for investigation of this case
Posted on | August 8, 2013 | 12 Comments
|
11:31 AM (57 minutes ago)  |
|
||
|
||||
Ms Taitz:
Please post the following:
The material that I forwarded to you is from Arizona Politics. So there is no misunderstanding, I did not write the article. The link to the article would not work so I copied and emailed it to you as a paste FYI.
Thanks for your help on this.
Regards,
Brian
Arizona’s Politics
|
Inbox
|
x |
|
|
5:40 AM (1 hour ago) |
|
||
|
|
||||
More on the unfolding debacle here in AZ.
UPDATE: Klayman Out Of Recall Arpaio Constitutionality Case, Judge Deciding Whether To Rule On Merits and/or Sanctions. July 22, 2013
Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Lisa Flores signed the Order Rescinding the Pro Hac Vice Admission of Larry Klayman (minute entry below), following the somewhat-surprising acknowledgment that Klayman had NOT in fact filed the application with the State Bar of Arizona necessary for an out-of-state attorney to represent Citizens To Protect Fair Elections in an Arizona Court, and that he had represented to the Court that the application was filed.
The State Bar confirmed to Arizona’s Politics that Klayman’s actions are being investigated. The plaintiffs are now being solely represented by former Arizona lawmaker – and current candidate for a District 15 House seat – David Burnell Smith.
Burnell Smith has reversed the strategy that Klayman apparently controlled regarding continuing the legal action even after the recall effort failed to turn in petition signatures at the May 30 deadline. Klayman told Arizona’s Politics and the Court that there still needed to be a ruling on the merits of the case because it was a matter capable of repetition yet avoiding judicial review (much like the issue that led to the Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade ruling in 1973).
The risk for Klayman and Burnell Smith in that strategy was (is) that the recall defendants also have a pending Motion for Sanctions against both the Plaintiffs and their legal counsel. That may explain why Burnell Smith began asking all of the defendants (including Maricopa County, which would have had to conduct the recall election if the Arpaio opponents had been successful) before the July 11 status conference if they would stipulate to dismiss the entire case.
At the July 11 telephonic status hearing, the Judge did dismiss the County defendants, but listened to Respect Arizona’s (the committee that was coordinating the recall effort) counsel, Christopher Ford, use Klayman’s rationale to argue for a ruling on the merits. The Minute Entry (posted below) indicates that Ford offered to forego oral argument on the complaint and the motions, and Burnell Smith then (in a motion filed July 18) withdrew his request for oral argument.
However, Ford tells Arizona’s Politics that he does hope that the Judge still plans to rule on the merits; he was not pleased that Burnell Smith is trying to avoid the Motion for Sanctions: “Arpaio’s yes-men brought this frivolous lawsuit as part of a multiprong effort to thwart Respect Arizona’s recall effort, and unfortunately their tactics were successful on the political stage, but now that their legal positions are to withstand court scrutiny, they run for cover.
Judge Flores is now “determin(ing)” whether she wishes to hear oral argument anyway; alternatively, she could decide to argue on the merits and the sanctions request based on the pleadings, or refuse to rule on the merits and dismiss the remains of the case.
The issue that the Plaintiffs’ based their complaint on is that the recall effort violated the Arizona Constitution by filing the recall within six months of the Sheriff being sworn in for his sixth term; the Constitutional provision does not define whether it only applies to the six-month period after an elected official’s first term, or whether a new six-month period starts each time the official wins re-election and is sworn in for a subsequent term. The Arizona statutes do specify that it only applies to the first time the official is elected; plaintiffs claim that statute is unconstitutional.
Comments
12 Responses to “From Brian Riley, tea party leader who brought to sheriff Arpaio a complaint from 250 citizens in regards to Obama’s use of forged IDs as the basis of his identity to run for President in AZ. after 2 years and multiple fund raisers Arpaio never submitted any criminal complaint against Obama to the District Attorney, even though through his representative Mike Zullo he declared Obama’s IDs to be a 100% forgery. Call sheriff Arpaio, demand he finally submit to the DA criminal complaint against Obama or refund to donors what he collected for investigation of this case”
Leave a Reply
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
August 8th, 2013 @ 8:47 am
you dont understand Orly- state employees are NOT used to working fast they have 2 speeds SLOW and STOP- and usually they are at STOP- OBAMA WILL BE OUT OF OFFICE AND LIVING IN kENYA BEFORE ZULLO GETS AROUND TO A REAL LAWSUIT-
August 8th, 2013 @ 9:01 am
Arpaio never submitted any criminal complaint against Obama to the District Attorney even though his representative, Mike Zullo, declared Obama’s IDs to be a 100% forgery. I think everyone should call Sheriff Arpaio (602) 876-1801 and demand he finally submit to the DA a criminal complaint against Obama or give a refund to donors the money he has collected for the investigation of this case.
August 8th, 2013 @ 11:34 am
the AG already said he would not listen, the AG is an OBOT. Why waste time on this then, since as you point out, time is of the essence.
August 8th, 2013 @ 12:36 pm
Brian: how did Sheriff Joe get re-elected, if he’s continued to stall his duty?
Post #2: Get serious with your name! Grow up!
Orly: on the first page here, I see writing from left to right, where it runs into ads on the right side of the page. And this is on a p.c. Can that be corrected?
August 8th, 2013 @ 1:33 pm
we do not know what AG said.
Arpaio is supposed to file the complaint with the District Attorney, after the complaint is filed, we will see what District Attorney does. Actually, I believe that the District Attorney of the Maricopa county is a conservative Republican, but so far he has absolutely nothing filed by Arpaio. He has nothing to go by. That is why it is important for Arpaio to act
August 8th, 2013 @ 3:19 pm
Unless the evidence quality has improved, and the new evidence is submitted to Maricopa County Attornery Montgomery by Arpaio and his CCP Public Charity to determine if a criminal complaint is warranted, we are stuck with Montgomery’s previous decision that he would not act after reviewing the evidence with Arpaio. In September 2012, Montgomery wrote to me and informed me that Zullo’s evidence amounted to speculation and was insufficient to act on.
I was one of the first five people to donate to the Public Charity called the Cold Case Posse. I also donated hundreds of hours of research to the cause inaddition to joining the CCP. My personal opinion, this all is about receiving financial donations for Arpaio’s campaign war chest and Zullo’s Public Charity called the Cold Case Posse. My expectation is that another Zullo book, possibly with Carl Gallups, is just around the corner. People who donated to the cause did not provide the cash for Zullo to write a book and possibly a second book. This just isn’t right. And by the way, just how many dollars has the CCP received in donations?
August 8th, 2013 @ 3:28 pm
the DA doesn’t need a sheriff to act, the DA can act on their own.
August 8th, 2013 @ 3:37 pm
August 8th, 2013 @ 4:07 pm
@ Brian: I’m kind of wondering how Sheriff Joe got re-elected, with all this hanging over his head for so long?
August 8th, 2013 @ 6:45 pm
The Turncoat Sheriff has known since April 2011 that Barry was the son of M X anyone who thinks he will do anyhing now is delusional
August 8th, 2013 @ 8:42 pm
other. Under our Constitution, a naturalized citizen stands on an equalfooting with the native citizen in all respects save that of eligibility to thePresidency.
Minor v. Happersett,
21 Wall. 162,88 U. S. 165;
Elk v. Wilkins ,
112U. S. 94,112 U. S. 101;
Osborn v. Bank of United States,
9 Wheat. 738,22 U. S. 827.Turning to the naturalization laws preceding the Act of 1906, being thoseunder which Luria obtained his certificate, we find that they required, first,that the alien, after coming to this country, should declare on oath, before acourt or its clerk, that it wasbona fidehis intention to become a citizen of theUnited States, and to renounce forever all allegiance and fidelity to anyforeign sovereignty; second, that at least two years should elapse between themaking of that declaration and his application for admission to citizenship;third, that as a condition to his admission, the court should be satisfied,through the testimony of citizens, that he had resided within the United Statesfive years at least, and that, during that time he had behaved as a man of goodmoral character, attached to the principles of the Constitution of the UnitedStates, and well disposed to the good order and happiness of the same; and,fourth, that at the time of his admission, he should declare on oath that hewould support the Constitution of the United States, and that he absolutelyand entirely renounced and abjured all allegiance and fidelity to every foreign
August 9th, 2013 @ 7:00 am
May I suggest a REALLY good read BlackB?
https://www.constitution.org/vattel/vattel_01.htm
Chapter 19 sub section 212 : It s a FACINATING Read, and YOU could actually Learn something about OUR Founders.