OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi


from BirtherReport.com

Posted on | November 27, 2010 | 2 Comments

Saturday, October 23, 2010

Attorney Taitz files Petition for Writ of Certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court for Captain Rhodes/Taitz v. Colonel MacDonald/Obama, et al..

ObamaRelease YourRecords on 11:55 AM

This Petition is regarding the sanctions ordered by federal judge Clay D. Land in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia. The sanctions were then upheld by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals. Case now appears on the SCOTUS Docket here.

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW

1. Does the ruling of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in Rhodes v. MacDonald violate the First and Fifth Amendments to the United States Constitution?

2. Does the ruling of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in Rhodes v. MacDonald conflict with the Supreme Court’s ruling in Offutt v. United States, 348 U.S. 11, 13 (1954).

3. Is a Federal Judge allowed to persecute a Civil Rights attorney and sanction her for merely bringing Civil rights violation cases to his court?

4. Are members of US military reduced to the level of slaves or serfs, if they are refused a hearing on the merits of their grievances in both military and federal courts and their attorneys are harassed and intimidated and verbally assaulted and insulted by a presiding Federal Judge?

5. Can a federal judge arbitrarily decide, what civil Rights violations case he wants to hear and which case he will not hear, and arbitrarily sanction a civil rights defender attorney for bringing to court a case that he doesn’t feel like hearing on the merits, as it is not beneficial for his career?

6. Should a federal judge forward a case to the jury for determination on issues of fact and law, when a case involves a president of the United States, his legitimacy and eligibility, which by default, affects the career of such judge?

7. Is the whole nation de facto reduced to the level of slaves or serfs, when one without valid vital records, without Social Security number of his own and without a valid long form birth certificate is able to get in the position of the President; and Congress is refusing to hear this issue, claiming that it is for the courts to decide and the courts are refusing to hear this issue, claiming that it is for the Congress to decide?

8. Should there be a decision from the Supreme court, clarifying legitimacy of US president or an order to the lower court to hear the issue on the merits?

9. What Constitutes “natural born citizen” according to Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution?

The full Petition embedded below. Previous reports on attorney Orly Taitz can be found here. Visit the Birther Vault for the long list of evidence against Obama & the Hawaii Department of Health and all of the people questioning Obama’s eligibility; [https://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/08/video-ltc-terry-lakins-attorney-on-cnn.html].
Captain Rhodes/Taitz v. Colonel MacDonald/Obama et al – United States Supreme Court – Petition for Writ of …  

Comments

2 Responses to “from BirtherReport.com”

  1. Starla
    November 27th, 2010 @ 12:36 pm

    AN EXCELLENT COMMENT

    From: http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/11/23/the-rise-of-freedom-isnt-new-buildings-in-new-york/

    “Bob1939 says:
    Wednesday, November 24, 2010 at 3:07 PM

    Thanksgiving is a time to humbly thank Almighty God for all our blessings, including his written word, freedom, liberty and life itself. At the same time if we have the presence of mind to thank our Creator-God, we should also be capable of discerning good from evil, and to be able to acknowledge the absolute seriousness of the trouble our Country is really in – at this time; due primarily to our obvious drift away from God and reality.

    We have a ghastly, immature, terrorist, moslem, usurper, bad actor POTUS, who is bent on destroying America, ” and who is doing it quite successfully so far”, and a Supreme Court who must deliberate for days on whether or not our Constitution should be maintained? when they all knew well that this was coming. If they don’t now stand up for America – then they are traitors too, and “We the People” must take over with “God’s Help”.

    This TSA fiasco going on right now is merely one more example of out-of-control-government, payback for our own stupidity for putting them in control of our lives, INSTEAD OF GOD. Anyone with half a brain knows that the best way to avert trouble is to open our eyes, use a little discernment, and observe passenger behavior. If that is called profiling, then so be it!…or does it make sense to create abusively stringent screening procedures, and then immediately exempt the very people who caused most of the initial terrorism problems we now suffer, while at the same time terrorizing every other obviously-innocent American-born traveling public.

    While Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, LCDR Fitzpatrick and many other such HEROES, currently remain under siege by our fraudulent, terrorist government, just when would be the right time to bring truth and reality forward and begin arresting these greedy, self-serving hooligans. Also under siege is our economy, our way of life, our heart-felt love of God, our religion, our healthcare, our education, our financial system, our political system, and our very ability to restore logic and freedom. Please wake up, America, and have a Happy Thanksgiving!!!… hopefully with God in mind, and in Jesus’s precious name – I pray. Amen.”

  2. Brianroy
    November 27th, 2010 @ 8:29 pm

    Orly, in the future, consider asking these 6 Questions to the US Supreme Court. Please?

    1. Is the burden of establishing a delegation of power to the United States, or the prohibition of power to the States, upon those making the claim, (such as the President of the United States, or those aspiring to such office) as stated by 333 US 640 @ 653 Bute v. Illinois (1948), a requirement under Supreme Court ruling and the Law or not?

    2. Is the requirement of presenting an identification of person, and proof of birth to follow 533 US 53 @ 54 and 62 in which both hospital records of where born and witnesses to the birth, be a partial fulfillment of 333 US 640 @ 653, in which the Court would recognize such certification as rising to the level of a jus soli claim for High Federal Office?

    3. Is there a requirement in the Constitional Article specified as 2.1.4. (now 2.1.5) in which a Natural Born Citizen, and those seeking the Presidency of the United States, have sole legience to the United States at birth?

    4. Does a Natural Born legience follow the condition of the nationality and citizenship of the child’s father at birth or not?

    5. Is the US Constitution to be understood in the natural sense per South Carolina v. United States, 199 U.S. 437 @ 448 – 450 (1905),
    Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U. S. 1 (1824) @ 188-189, taking also into account the influence of Vattel — even as cited in The Venus, 12 U.S. (8 Cranch) 253 @ 289-290 (1814) —
    on the definitions of the framers in using “natural born citizen” in place of indigenes (indigenous) as used by Vattel?

    6. Does every word of the US Constitution have its due force, as stated by Holmes v. Jennison, 39 U.S. (14 Peters) 540 @ 570-71 (1840); and is the precept of interpretation of the US Constitution to this effect, where “every word [of the US Constitution] must have its due force” active in the Rule of Law in the Supreme Court of the United States as it regards “natural born citizen” or not?

Leave a Reply