15 Responses to “Federal Judge Refuses to Drop Injunction Against Obama Immigration Policies”

1. Mona Lola
   May 27th, 2015 @ 3:53 am

   Orly, what happens if your cases are still pending when Obama leaves office? Can you continue to go after him for fraud? Will it be easier to prosecute him as a private citizen?Let’s hope you don’t have to do the all over again if Rubio or Jindal gets the nomination.

2. Judy
   May 27th, 2015 @ 6:00 am

   santorum/walker score vs illegals/immigration etc…scoreboard here
   https://www.numbersusa.com/content/elections/races/presidential/2016-presidential-hopefuls.html

3. Judy
   May 27th, 2015 @ 10:49 am

   hillary rodham speaks
   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VxASD4jHgCk

4. Larry
   May 27th, 2015 @ 1:16 pm

   Hanen has a history of anti-immigration decisions. His reputation was so well-known that notorious anti-Obama conspiracy theorist Orly Taitz worked to ensure that her lawsuit accusing the government of “trafficking illegal aliens” went in front of him.

   AND HOW is this ANY different from Obamy having Holder/OR his replacement in his back pocket?….you fight fire with fire…GO ORLY…GO

5. American Patriot...
   May 27th, 2015 @ 2:42 pm

   Yes, indeed!

   Dr Orly is a pit-bull with rabies, when it comes to keeping treason away from all of us!!!

6. American Patriot...
   May 27th, 2015 @ 2:43 pm

   I love it!!!!!!!!! 🙂

7. concerned
   May 27th, 2015 @ 3:05 pm

   Another insanity. This take control of a US port is allowed and facilities by Clinton, so it should be reversed, as it is not in the interest of US:
   A 35-year contract signed last year and set to go operational next month allows a United Arab Emirates-based company managed by Badr Jafar to operate a cargo terminal managing containers.
   Read more at https://www.wnd.com/2015/05/dubai-ports-redux-arab-takeover-of-port-canaveral/#oJ7BOYv65SpUwaxb.99

8. Veritas
   May 27th, 2015 @ 4:15 pm

   Soebarkah must have read the Book of GENESIS and thought it was talking about HIM:
   —

   Obama admin asserts dominion over creeks, streams, wetlands, ditches — even big puddles…

9. MARK HANSON
   May 27th, 2015 @ 5:47 pm

   ON DRUDGE REPORT

   Officials from the Justice Department said in a statement that they would not ask the Supreme Court for permission to carry out the president’s immigration programs — which seek to provide work permits and deportation protection to millions of undocumented immigrants — while a fight over presidential authority plays out in the lower courts.

10. Veritas
    May 27th, 2015 @ 7:17 pm

    Humanitarian or villain?

    Defender or Interloper?

    Patriot or Internationalist?

    Real or Fake?

    Innocuous or Treacherous?

    ====

    (Obama)Spends to ‘educate’ Americans who resist resettlement of Muslim refugees…

    Residents: Arizona border town ‘like war zone all the time’…

11. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    May 28th, 2015 @ 5:16 am

    they are not suein on the issue of stay, however they will probably sue on injunction or on the final decision, just as it happened in Obamacare

12. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    May 29th, 2015 @ 7:54 am

    we’ll have to wait and see what the judges do

13. Ron(Dallas)
    May 30th, 2015 @ 8:09 am

    This news on the surface sounds good but what changed? It looks like business as usual!

14. The Constitution...
    May 30th, 2015 @ 11:11 am

    Let’s hope that Judge Hanen will make this a lot better for America…

    And due to some tech problems, I can’t get the following items posted today…as it relates to the (possible) collapse of the dollar???

    And O wants to go to a cashless society and switch to another currency, as well???

    We need to bombard Congress to (NOT) allow these pre-bankruptcy acts, or the more is spent, the more we could possibly move to these (2) items above!

    If this happens, do we get the (new currency) with that 666-number embedded?????

15. Byrch
    June 1st, 2015 @ 7:32 pm

    To poster 4. Larry,
    [Hanen has a history of anti-immigration decisions.] This is false. Hanen is concerned with illegal immigration and fallowing the immigration laws. This quote makes no sense in the original piece.
    […notorious anti-Obama conspiracy theorist Orly Taitz…] Orly is not a conspiracy theorist. She follows the facts and the constitution requirements. This quote is a lie in the original piece.
    [Orly Taitz worked to ensure that her lawsuit accusing the government of “trafficking illegal aliens” went in front of him (Hanen).] This is true and the lawsuit is well supported by facts.
    [AND HOW is this ANY different from Obamy having Holder/OR his replacement in his back pocket?…]
    Judge Hanen is NOT in Dr. Taitz pocket. The current Hanen’s decisions have solid rational based on current law, precedents, and well thought out logic. This is what distinguishes him from WH camp. Yes, there is a difference between Orly and Hanen on one side and Mr. Obama and Holder collaboration on the other side. Obama and Holder do not follow the law and do not follow the Constitution.
    I think the parallel that you offer is counterproductive. [you fight fire with fire]. This is broadly usable. Are you suggesting then that to counter lawlessness, falsification, and arbitrariness, Orly needs to use these same methods?
    If so, many followers of Orly might disagree with you.

Leave a Reply