Extremely important! E-mail the Judiciary committee at KathrynRexrode@mail.house.gov and call at 202-225-3951
Posted on | February 19, 2013 | 36 Comments
Press release
Law Offics of Orly Taitz
Every law abiding U.S. citizen is urged to e-mail and call the Judiciary Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives c/o staff member
c/o Committee staff member KathrynRexrode.
Kathryn.Rexrode@mail.house.gov
and demanded immediate hearing on the issue of Barack Obama’s use of forged IDs and a CT SSN, which failed both E-Verify and SSNVS, as well as criminal complicity and cover up by high ranking officials of the U.S. Government, Social Security Administration and employees of a number of courts. Over 34,000 citizens signed this petition as can be seen on OrlyTaitzESQ.com. 34,000 U.S. citizens are demanding an immediate hearing on this most important issue of elections fraud, forgery and treason
Attention Judiciary Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives
Attention Chairman Congressman Bob Goodlatte
c/o Committee staff member KathrynRexrode.
Press release: clerks of the Supreme Court never forwarded to 5 out of 9 Justices one single page of pleadings, they also did not forward to any of the Justices the Supplemental Brief. Demand for investigation forwarded to Congressman Goodlatte, Chair of the Judiciary Committee of Congress
Noonan v Bowen application for STAY Supreme Court of the U.S. Roberts
Noonan supplemental brief with the SCOTUS stamp 02.12.2013
Press release: clerks of the Supreme Court never forwarded to 5 out of 9 Justices one single page of pleadings, they also did not forward to any of the Justices the Supplemental Brief. Demand for investigation forwarded to Congressman Goodlatte, Chair of the Judiciary Committee of Congress
Law offices of orly taitz
29839 santa margarita ste 100
Rancho santa margarita ca 92688
ph. 949-683-5411 fax 949-766-7603
orly.taitz@gmail.com
orlytaitzesq.com
02.16.2013
Via Federal Express
Attn. Congressman Bob Goodlatte
Chairman of the Committee on Judiciary of the U.S. House of Representatives
WASHINGTON, DC OFFICE
2309 Rayburn HOB Washington, D.C. 20515 Phone: (202) 225-5431 Fax: (202) 225-9681
PETITION FOR AN IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION IN THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
EVIDENCE OF EMPLOYEES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES HIDING FROM JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT PLEADINGS AND DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED BY PLAINTIFFS AND ATTORNEYS, REMOVING CASES FROM THE ELECTRONIC DOCKET, EVIDENCE OF BOGUS CONFERENCES OF JUSTICES BEING REPORTED TO THE PUBLIC, WHEN NO CUCH CONFERENCES TOOK PLACES AND THE JUSTICES BEING CLUELESS ABOUT THE VERY EXISTENCES OF HE CASE, EVIDENCE OF CRIMINAL COMPLICITY OF THE EMPLOYEES OF THE SUPREME COURT AND TREASON IN THE MOST SERIOUS CASES DEALING WITH NATIONAL SECURITY.
02.16.2013.
Dear Mr. Goodlatte,
On 12.11. 2013 Attorney Dr. Orly Taitz, ES filed an application for stay on behalf of plaintiffs in Noonan et al v Bowen et al 12 A 606.
On 12.26.2012 Attorney for Plaintiffs resubmitted her application to the Chief Justice John Roberts, who referred the case to the conference of all 9 Justices to be conducted on February 15, 2013. Taitz followed Rule 22 of the Supreme Court that stated “Renewed application is made by a letter to the clerk, designating the Justice to whom the application is to be directed, and accompanied by copies of the original application…” these copies were supposed to be forwarded to 9 individual justices, library of Congress and National Archives.
Clerk for Stays Redmond Barnes sent back to Taitz 5 copies, whereby 5 justices never got the application, so clearly they could not discuss the case during the conference, as they never saw a word of the pleadings or evidence. Taitz submits herein the Exhibit 1, photograph of the original box in which 5 copies were sent back, as well as the photograph of the stamp. Taitz preserved the box and the documents as evidence.
Moreover, on 02.12.2013 Taitz traveled to Washington DC and submitted to the clerks’ office a supplemental brief with information crucial to the U.S. National Security to be reviewed by the justices prior to the February 15 conference. Taitz talked to clerks Sevgi Tekeli and James Baldin. She was told to give the pleadings to the guard at the entrance, as the Supreme Court has mandatory screening for anthrax, but the pleadings will be docketed the same day and forwarded to Justices.
The clerks’ office never docketed the Suplemental Brief (Exhibit 2 Supplemental Brief with the date stamp of the Supreme Court) and sent it back, so none of the Justices read the Supplemental Brief as well.
Taitz provides the Judiciary Committee with the application (Exhibit 3) and the Supplementary Brief (Exhibit 2).
Case at hand was scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013 in a conference of all the justices of the Supreme Court of the United States.
This case came from the Supreme Court of California and was brought by Presidential Candidates: Edward Noonan, Thomas Gregory MacLeran and Keith Judd against the Secretary of the State of California, seeking to stay the certification of the votes for the candidate for the U.S. President Barack Obama due to the fact that the aforementioned candidate committed fraud when he provided his declaration of the candidate and when the Democratic party submitted the certificate of the nomination due to the fact that Barack Obama is not eligible for the position, as he is not a Natural born U.S. citizen, as required by the U.S. Constitution Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5. The declaration of the candidate and the certification of the nomination were based on fraud, on Obama’s use of forged IDs, , stolen Connecticut social Security number xxx-xx-4425, use of a name that was not legally his use of Indonesian citizenship and based on aiding and abetting by corrupt governmental officials. Most notable example of criminal aiding and abetting was signing by the chair of the Democratic Party of Hawaii Brian Schatz a falsified OCON (Official Certificate Of Nomination of a candidate) where the usual wording “eligible according to the provisions of the U.S. Constitution” were removed in order to accommodate ineligible Obama.
Plaintiffs provided the Supreme Court of California and the Supreme Court of the United States with over 100 pages of official records, sworn affidavits of senior law enforcement officials and experts showing that Barack Obama is:
- A citizen of Indonesia, as listed in his school registration #203 from Franciscan Assisi school in Jakarta, Indonesia. As a citizen of Indonesia Obama was never eligible and never legitimate for the U.S. Presidency.
- Obama is using last name not legally his. Plaintiffs provided this court with the passport records of Stanley Ann Dunham, deceased mother of Barack Obama, showing that he is listed under the last name Soebarkah in her passport. He was removed from her passport in August of 1969 pursuant to the request and sworn statement of Ms. Dunham and signed by the U.S. consul in Jakarta Indonesia. As the requirement for removal as listed in the passport, is obtaining a foreign allegiance, it is believed that Barack Obama Soebarkah was removed from his mother’s passport when he obtained his Indonesian passport. Barack Obama cannot serve as a U.S. President as the legal entity Barack Obama does not exist. The only legal entity based on the only verifiable record is Barack Obama Soebarkah.
- Obama does not have a valid U.S. birth certificate. Plaintiff provided affidavits from Sheriff of Maricopa County Arizona Joseph Arpaio, Investigator Zullo, experts Felicito Papa, Douglas Vogt, Paul Irey, showing that the image posted by Obama on Whitehouse.gov is a computer generated forgery. When there is a question of authenticity of a document, the only way to authenticate, is to conduct expert evaluation of the original document. Registrar of the State of Hawaii and Director of Health and Deputy Attorney General of Hawaii in charge of the Health Department were obstructing justice and absolutely refused to comply with any subpoenas and produce the original 1961 birth certificate and as such there was never any authentication of the alleged birth certificate. After 4 years of obstruction of Justice, it is clear that the Hawaiian officials have nothing to show and genuine 1961 birth certificate for Barack Obama simply does not exist.
Obama does not have a valid Selective Service certificate. Based on the affidavit of Sheriff Arpaio and investigator Zullo, alleged copy of Obama’s Selective Service Certificate, is COMPUTER GENERATED FORGERY. In this supplemental brief Plaintiffs are providing additional evidence, a sworn affidavit from the Chief investigator of the Special Investigations Unit of the US Coast Guard (ret) and former special agent of the DHS Jeffrey Stephan Coffman who attested under the penalty of perjury that Obama’s alleged Selective Service registration is a forgery.
Plaintiffs submitted with their TRO and complaint the Affidavits of Sheriff Arpaio and Investigator Zullo and as a supplement an affidavit of the Chief Investigator of the Special investigations of the US Coast Guard Jeffrey Stephan Coffman. Based on those affidavits Obama’s alleged application for the selective service is a forgery. According to 5 USC § 3328.every man born after 1959 has to register with the Selective Service and cannot work in the executive branch if he did not register with the selective service.
(a)An individual—
(1)who was born after December 31, 1959, and is or was required to register under section 3 of the Military Selective Service Act (50 App. U.S.C. 453); and
(2)who is not so registered or knowingly and willfully did not so register before the requirement terminated or became inapplicable to the individual,
shall be ineligible for appointment to a position in an executive agency.
As Obama claims to be born in 1961 (without a valid birth certificate we don’t even know when he was born) he had a duty to register with the Selective Service. A forgery does not represent a registration, as such Obama is not eligible to be working in the executive branch of the U.S. government. He is not eligible to be a President in the White House or a janitor in the White House and it is a duty of this court to exercise its’ jurisdiction to rule Obama not constitutionally eligible.
- 4. Obama’s 2009 tax returns posted by Obama himself on line showed him using a CT Social Security number xxx-xx-4425, which failed both E-verify and SSNVS. Affidavit of investigator Albert Hendershot provided herein as an exhibit showed it being issued to Harrison (Harry ) J. Bounel, born in 1890 in Russia, immigrant to the United States, presumed to be deceased, whose death was either not reported to the SSA or deleted from the computer system by a treasonous and criminally complicit employee of the SSA. Due to Obama’s use of a stolen SSN he is not eligible to work anywhere in the United States, not in the Federal Branch, not in any other branch, not in the private sector, not even to pick tomatoes or clean toilets. Based on his use of a stolen SSN the only thing Obama is eligible to is at least 18 month prison term and deportation. For that reason alone the Supreme Court of California erred in denying the application. This court has to either grant the application or remand it back to the Supreme Court of California for reconsideration.
315 MILLION U.S. CITIZENS DEMAND TO KNOW, WHO IS COMMITTING TREASON AND AIDING AND ABETTING THE USURPATION OF THE U.S. PRESIDENCY: IS IT DONE BY 9 JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT OR BY THE STAFF ATTORNEYS AND CLERKS OF THE COURT WHO HAVE HIDDEN THE PLEADINGS AND EVIDENCE IN THIS CASE FROM THE JUSTICES
Justices Antonin Scalia in his book “Making your case” p77 described a process of triage in the Supreme Court, he wrote: “Another factor distinctive to petitions for certiorari is that judges don’t like to spend a lot of time deciding what to decide. Indeed in most courts they won’t even read the brief in support of your petition, but will rely on summaries (or on the selection of particular briefs) by law clerks. And law clerks don’t like to spend much time on this job either.”
Unfortunately, the clerks do more than summaries. Taitz, counsel for the plaintiffs submits as Exhibit 3 a recent correspondence with the Supreme Court in regards to case Taitz v Astrue USCA District of Columbia Circuit no 11-5304, where Taitz caught the employees of the Supreme Court actively obstructing justice and tampering with the documents submitted to the Supreme Court. Taitz provided the court with Federal Express receipts showing packages received by the Supreme Court and signed for by the employees of the Supreme Court, but never docketed and hidden from the Justices of the Supreme Court by the employees. These employees of the court were not appointed by the President, were not confirmed by the Senate, they never took an Oath of Allegiance and nobody knows where their allegiance lies.
This is only one of a number of suspicious activities in the Supreme Court of the
United States. Previously a case Lightfoot v Bowen A-084524 by the same attorney Taitz was deleted from the docket of the Supreme Court on inauguration day January 21, 2008, ostensibly to give an impression that there are no more challenges to Obama’s legitimacy. Only after the enormous pressure from the public, media, State Representatives and sworn affidavits from attorneys the case was reentered in the public docket. Clerk in charge for STAYs Danny Bickle repeatedly made incorrect statements claiming that all files were deleted due to some type of computer malfunction, which was not the case. Later, in March of 2009 during a meeting with attorneys and book signing in Los Angeles Taitz was able to discuss the case with Justice Scalia, who was absolutely clueless that the case even existed, even though according to the docket he was a part of the conference of justices who denied that case dealing with the legitimacy of the U.S. President and he voted to deny that case. One can believe that a judge would forget a case about some trivial dispute, but not a case dealing with the U.S. Presidency he supposedly discussed in conference only a month and a half earlier. It is clear that the case Lightfoot v Bowen was decided by the clerks, the names of the justices were printed on the order when the justices had no clue the case even existed. In a case at hand dealing with the usurpation of the U.S. Presidency this is HIGH TREASON, for which guilty parties should be getting a life in prison or death penalty and the nation is entitled to know who these people are.
In a different case Rhodes v MacDonald 10A56 (entered by the Supreme Court as
Taitz v MacDonald) a docket entry showing Justice Clarence Thomas denying an
application for STAY was made retroactively on a weekend when Justice Thomas was thousands of miles away giving a seminar in Utah. When Taitz demanded to see an actual signature by Justice Thomas on the order to deny stay or on the cover page of the application, she was referred to Eric Fossum, the same
employee, who signed the denial letter in the Taitz v Astrue case, who admitted to her on the phone that there is no signature of Justice Thomas either on the order or on the cover page of the petition. As such, there is no proof justice Thomas ever saw the petition or ever read a word written in the petition. When citizens went to the Supreme Court and requested copies of the pleadings in aforementioned cases, they were told that there are no such documents available.
Noonan v Bowen is a case which provides an undeniable evidence of usurpation of the U.S. Presidency by a criminal, a citizen of Indonesia who claims that his name is Barack Obama, who is using all forged IDs and a stolen Social Security number and a last name not legally his. Allowing this usurpation to go on is an act of HIGH TREASON. The nation has a right to know who is committing high treason: 9 justices of the Supreme Court of clerks, who hide the pleadings and sworn affidavits from justices. For that reason plaintiffs respectfully demand signatures of the justices on the order or on the front page of the application. If there are no actual signatures of the justices the plaintiffs and the nation as a whole will know that the justices never saw a word of pleadings an the case was “ruled upon” by court employees with unknown allegiance. Plaintiffs also demand to know the names of the court employees who summarized the case, provided it to the justices and compiled the list of approved or denied applications. Plaintiffs, U.S. Congress, law enforcement and World Community at large deserve to know who committed HIGH TREASON, who should be tried for high treason, who should be getting a penalty which is customary in such cases, which is a life in prison or death penalty.
Conclusion:
Plaintiffs and their attorney are demanding an immediate investigation of both the actions of the employees of the Supreme Court of the United States in hiding pleadings and exhibits from the Justices and Barack Obama’s use of forged IDs and a stolen Social Security 042-68-4425.
Not addressing this case represents high treason against the United States of America and people of the United States of America
Respectfully submitted
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ
Exhibit 1
Exhibit 2
Noonan supplemental brief with the SCOTUS stamp 02.12.2013
Exhibit 3
Noonan v Bowen application for STAY Supreme Court of the U.S. Roberts
Comments
36 Responses to “Extremely important! E-mail the Judiciary committee at KathrynRexrode@mail.house.gov and call at 202-225-3951”
Leave a Reply
February 19th, 2013 @ 2:29 pm
Done deal it was so easy, press the button walla they got my e-mail. I hope talk or communications helps in the battles to free America.
February 19th, 2013 @ 2:39 pm
My email to KathrynRexrode@mail.house.gov went nowhere. I got a message saying that my email was “undeliverable”. Really????
February 19th, 2013 @ 2:46 pm
[…] Extremely important! E-mail the Judiciary committee at Kathryn Rexrode@mail.house.gov and call at 20… […]
February 19th, 2013 @ 2:51 pm
As an American citizen, I demand an immediate hearing on the issue of Barak Obama’s forged documents and coverup by high-ranking government officials, social security, and the courts. This matter must be attended to immediately for the security of our country and because it is our right to know.
February 19th, 2013 @ 3:01 pm
That was easy enough! I hope sending emails help!!!
February 19th, 2013 @ 3:08 pm
Kathryn Rexrode,
As a very concerned law abiding U.S. citizen, I reach out to you with a very important request. Please set forth an immediate hearing on the issue of Barack Obama’s use of forged IDs and a CT SSN, which failed both E-Verify and SSNVS, as well as criminal complicity and cover up by high ranking officials of the U.S. Government, Social Security Administration and employees of a number of courts.
Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter.
Respectfully,
Tiffany Taylor
February 19th, 2013 @ 3:10 pm
done!! never give up!!
February 19th, 2013 @ 3:10 pm
My mail to KathrynRexrode@mail.house.gov came back returned. :/
February 19th, 2013 @ 3:11 pm
E-mail sent to KathrynRexrode
Impeach Obama – San Diego VIDEO
https://www.westernjournalism.com/impeach-obama-protest-in-san-diego/
February 19th, 2013 @ 3:13 pm
I sent an email to Rexrode and cc to you but came back undeliverable to Rexrode. Better address? Thanks!
February 19th, 2013 @ 3:19 pm
It is done. I certainly hope someone will pay attention soon.
February 19th, 2013 @ 3:20 pm
Red flag is reporting case denied!
February 19th, 2013 @ 3:21 pm
February 19th, 2013 @ 3:27 pm
She ust have closed this email account:
This message was created automatically by the mail system (ecelerity).
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
>>> KathrynRexrode@mail.house.gov (after RCPT TO): 550 5.7.1 Unable to deliver to
February 19th, 2013 @ 3:37 pm
I am asking for an immediate hearing on the issue of Barack Obama’s use of forged IDs and a CT SSN, which failed both E-Verify and SSNVS, as well as criminal complicity and cover up by high ranking officials of the U.S. Government, Social Security Administration and employees of a number of courts. Over 34,000 citizens signed this petition as can be seen on OrlyTaitzESQ.com. 34,000 U.S. citizens are demanding an immediate hearing on this most important issue of elections fraud, forgery and treason
February 19th, 2013 @ 3:37 pm
February 19th, 2013 @ 3:38 pm
I have tried 3 times to email KathrynRexrode@mail.house.gov, and have gotten an “undeliverable” message. The 3rd time I used gmail and got this message:
“Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently”
KathrynRexrode@mail.house.gov
Technical details of permanent failure:
“Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the recipient domain mail.house.gov by perseus.house.gov”
This smells very bad….so who the hell is this perseus????
February 19th, 2013 @ 4:08 pm
Yes, but do you realize //how// hard it is to get the attention of a staffer, let alone a congressman?
The staffers hold all the power. Nothing goes through until they say it is ok (or they don’t bother to show it) and the congressman never sees it.
February 19th, 2013 @ 4:27 pm
Yes, also done as well. I used a lot of Dr. Taitz’s text from above. Keep the prayers going for justice.
February 19th, 2013 @ 5:05 pm
As a United States citizen, I want a Supreme Court hearing on B. Obama’s questionable legitimacy to hold a federal office.
February 19th, 2013 @ 5:07 pm
put a period after the first name
Kathryn.Rxrode@mail.house.gov
February 19th, 2013 @ 5:08 pm
it’s Kathryn.rexrode
February 19th, 2013 @ 6:34 pm
Hi Only,
Other than Thomas, do you have any idea which justices did not receive the pleadings?
February 19th, 2013 @ 11:46 pm
Dear Ms. Rexrode,
Please forward this message immediately to Chairman Goodlatte.
Please immediately set hearing with the goal to examine and expose the on-the-record proven all forged IDs of a resident of the White House with uncertain names Obama/Soetoro/Soebarkach/Bounel, a proven Indonesian citizen, a self-proclaimed son of a Kenia national – which alone is incompatible with being US Natural Born in the definition mentioned in the 2008 Sen. Resolution 511 on McCain.
Please act expeditiously with the utmost urgency, as America is under a control of a foreign agent presenting the unprecedented national security threat.
Please immediately have Dr. Orly Taitz to testify and bring all her expert testimonials to the hearing.
All the institution of the nation are paralyzed or corrupted so much, that the clerks of courts including the Supreme Court of the US resort to cheating and filtering the submitted documents as though cardsharpers in a house of disrepute!
All the institution of the nation keep bluffing on the proven fraud Obama/Soetoro/Soebarkach/Bounel while the proofs of his crimes are on records and widely known to the entire world.
The former great nation turned into a stupid poker player bluffing on and on as though he will never have to open the cards!.. Stop it already!!!
Alexander Gofen, San Francisco
https://www.resonoelusono.com/2008vs1917.htm
February 20th, 2013 @ 4:48 am
Too funny. No shot. I believe scotus owns a photocopier.
February 20th, 2013 @ 4:48 am
Too funny. No shot. I believe scotus owns a photocopier.
February 20th, 2013 @ 5:43 am
Please help Americans to have their country back.
February 20th, 2013 @ 9:21 am
Kathryn Rexrode’s email as posted is incorrect. There needs to be a period between her first and last names. So Kathryn.Rexrode@mail.house.gov
February 20th, 2013 @ 10:49 am
no shot of what?
February 20th, 2013 @ 12:22 pm
EVERY TIME I TRY TO SEND IT GETS RETURNED
February 20th, 2013 @ 6:37 pm
No shot of dignity or common decency.
February 20th, 2013 @ 6:44 pm
emailed kathryn.rexrode, got this reply.
Dear Ms. Arnabee,
Thank you so much for your recent email. As you may imagine, we get so many emails demanding hearings on Presidential eligibility that we cannot possibly reply to each personally. Please be assured that demanding hearings on Presidential eligibility is a serious concern for Representative Goodlatte and the Judiciary committee, and that no effort will be spared in pursuing demanding hearings on Presidential eligibility.
Regards,
Kathryn Rexrode
February 20th, 2013 @ 8:33 pm
My niece, Linda McFate is correct! The computer DEMANDS perfection. You can’t be ‘almost’ right. That is why it is important to copy and paste a URL or an email addy, or you are going to get ‘undeliverable’ emails or ‘page not found’ in your browser. I copied and pasted the email address from Orly’s website, and BCCed my letter to the Congressman to Orly and a couple other friends earlier today, and the one to Kathryn Rexrode came back UNDELIVERABLE. The email address at Orly’s that I copied and pasted was incorrect; it was missing the period between Kathryn and Rexrode. So if yours comes back, send it again with the PERIOD. Kathryn.Rexrode@mail.house.gov
February 23rd, 2013 @ 5:45 pm
this does not sound right
it did not come from her
February 25th, 2013 @ 7:01 am
I called, but have a gut feeling that John, the guy who answered will not deliver my message. Hired by corrupt President,
March 20th, 2013 @ 9:01 am
Bring Extra Copies of your Resume. It is obtainable in ivory and white.. Hair should be worn loose either straight or in soft waves, or held back in chic low ponytail or soft chignon. This will aid select the right kind of sneaker in lieu of wasting time dealing with a number of these products.. If you want the drama of a dark dramatic dress without going all the way to black, Xscape Dresses come in many styles in the color navy. You could have a wardrobe malfunction, hay it works for the starlets on the red carpet why not you? If you really think having wardrobe malfunctions is working for them then I can’ have another useful thing to say to you. ralph lauren outlet https://www.eritrea-unmission.org/rpolo.asp