Extremely important! Don’t play Obama’s game, what to do with the second wave of ballot challenges?
Posted on | June 22, 2012 | 6 Comments
This is extremely important. I am now getting from people copies of the challenges they filed with their Secretaries of State and I am just about getting a heart attack, and I am ready to smack all of those morons from Article 2 super pack gang. Why so? Because those challenges are empty. There is nothing there aside from a quote of Minor v Happersett , and that is what Helen Tansey, Dean Haskins and the rest of this Article 2 superpack was telling people to do. I do not know whether these Article 2 superpack people are just dumb or they were brought to emasculate the effort, to reduce it to just a theoretical discussion, which is the easiest to beat, but they played Obama’s hand. Obama wants people to dwell in theoretical discussions and not go into the areas of crimes, which are black and white. When you get to crimes, Obama loses and loses big. Not only these crimes remove Obama from the White House, they move him straight into the Big House.
Here is an explanation. 2 citizen parent requirement is your weakest argument. It is a theoretical argument. There is no specific law, stating what is the meaning of natural born. There is no clear precedent. Minor v Happersett is a case, which dealt with voting rights, where the court simply mentioned that Virginia Minor was born in the country, her parents are citizens, she is a native, there are questions and doubts about other groups of people, whether they are citizens or not, but there is no doubt about her. I bring forward this case, but the Secretary of State is not required to be a legal scholar. She has a way out. Obama’s attorneys will brin Von Kim ark case and will argue that there is no specific law saying that it is not enough for one parent to be a US citizen. On the other hand the Sec of State has no right to be complicit in elections fraud, she has no right to put on the ballot a candidate, who is committing elections fraud. Your strongest argument is:
1. Obama is using a name that is not legally his. In his mother’s passport he is listed as Soebarkah. In his school records from Indonesia he is listed as Soetoro. This is fraud, identity fraud.
2. Obama published his tax returns. When they were opened in Adobe Illustrator, his full unredacted Social Security was clearly visible. He is using 042-68-4425. When E-verify and SSNVS were done, those showed that there is no match, this Connecticut Social was never assigned to Barack Obama. The man is a criminal, committing Social Security fraud, he is using a Social security number from a state, where he never resided, which was never assigned to him. He belongs in prison. Period, end of discussion.
3. His Selective Service certificate is a forgery. All of the other certificates from 1980 show a valid postage stamp with 4 digit year. Obama has a forged stamp with a 2 digit year. Forgery, fraud, he belongs in prison. (I wonder, how big was the incentive for Alvin Onaka to pull this)
4. His birh certificate was shown by multiple experts to be a computer generated forgery. Alvin T. Onaka and Obama both belong in prison for uttering forged documents.
If Secretary of State and elections commission allow this criminal on the ballot, they are criminally complicit in elections fraud, forgery and treason.
When you are bringing a ballot challenge and miss all of these important arguments, which are the meat and potatoes of your case, and you only mention article 2 superpack argument that 2 parents have to be US citizens, you rob yourselves of the strongest argument.
I mentioned Minor v Happersett in my pleadings. As a matter of fact I was the first attorney, who brought forward writings by Emer DeVatel, those were included in my Application for Stay on behalf of Gail Lightfoot that I filed with the Supreme Court of the United States four years ago, in 2008. While I did not abandon it, it is only a part of my case.
So, what do you need to do now?
Luckily, we get to bite a second bite of the apple, as we bring forward challenges to usurper Obama, criminal with forged IDs sitting in the White House, who is seeking to be a candidate in the general election.
I need you to get off the couch and start moving.
We need challenges in every state in the nation.
What I need you to do, is write to your Secretary of State and your Attorney General. Write that you demand immediate investigation of elections fraud and write that all the evidence of fraud anf forgery is in the attached letter from CA attorney Oly Taitz. Send this letter to me. Please, notarize your signature and provide me with the info of what state you reside in, name and address for your Sec of State and your AG. I will attach a letter with all the affidavits, video of the trial in Ga and Arpaio’s press conference and will submit it.
Also, I have to pay for my paralegal to put together all the papers, all the packages, I have to pay for the DVDs, for printing, for certified mail, so donations are desperately needed.
If we want to bring a strong case of racketeering, of top officials being criminally complicit in elections fraud, forgery and treason, we need to send all the evidence to them. We have to warn them, otherwise they will state that they had no knowledge of any crimes.
Keep in mind, we have power here. RICO allows ordinary citizens to bring causes of actions involving criminal charges and felonies. This is the beauty of RICO. We can make it, we have to make it. We cannot allow continuous usurpation of the US Presidency. This is a coup d’etat, this is a destruction of the country. We have to act.
PS I just got a copy of the order, showing that unfortunately Van Irion’s case for Liberty legal foundation and John Dummitt, filed in TN was dismissed. I am sorry about that, but we have to keep going.
Comments
6 Responses to “Extremely important! Don’t play Obama’s game, what to do with the second wave of ballot challenges?”
Leave a Reply
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
June 22nd, 2012 @ 8:57 am
Originally all this was about Obama’s natural born citizen status, but now it should be elevated to a CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION because of the crimes of identity theft and document forgeries. Watergate started with some low level political dirty tricks break-in at a Party office. It ended with President Nixon ordering the cover-up of the event and by doing so committing a far more greater crime.
Oh the good old days. Now blatant criminal activity all through the White House gets a yawn from the media and judges turn a blind eye!
Thank God for patriots like Orly who continue to carry the torch of freedom high!
June 22nd, 2012 @ 8:58 am
Originally all this was about Obama’s natural born citizen status, but now it should be elevated to a CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION because of the crimes of identity theft and document forgeries. Watergate started with some low level political dirty tricks break-in at a Party office. It ended with President Nixon ordering the cover-up of the event and by doing so committing a far greater crime.
Oh the good old days. Now blatant criminal activity all through the White House gets a yawn from the media and judges turn a blind eye!
Thank God for patriots like Orly who continue to carry the torch of freedom high!
June 22nd, 2012 @ 9:00 am
Orly your post states that “There is no specific law, stating what is the meaning of natural born.” Dr. Taitz with all due respect I must disagree.
The Constitution itself is the “specific law, stating what is the meaning of natural born.”
The most authoritative source for the meaning of a NBC is in fact the Constitution, logically deduced directly from Article 2, Section 1, as one born in U.S. of U.S. citizen parents (plural). The is confirmed many times by American history, the Founders, Congress and the Supreme Court. — Essay, ‘Obama is Not An Eligible Natural Born Citizen’ www dot ObamaBirthCertificate.net (July 4, 2011).
The Constitution irrefutably requires the President to be a “natural born citizen” not just a citizen. They don’t share the same meaning. Nor is meaning of a NBC made ambiguous by being undefined in the Constitution, as it doesn’t directly define any terms.
Perhaps its best to use both the Constitution and the identity anomalies, in pursuing the courts to depose Obama from office and preclude his reelection. Certainly the two strategies are not mutually exclusive.
As Leo Donofrio, Esq., and many others have pointed out, in 1874 the U.S. Supreme Court in Minor v. Happersett, clearly defined a natural born citizen as those born in the country to citizen parents!
Minor v. Happersett, 1874. “The Court held that Minor was a member of the “class” of persons who were natural born citizens. They defined this class as those born in the US to “parents” (plural) who were citizens.” This is “binding precedent as to the Constitutional definition of a natural born citizen.” — Leo Donofrio, JD., Natural born Citizen, ‘Minor v. Happersett Is Binding Precedent As To The Constitutional Definition Of A Natural Born Citizen’ https://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2011/06/24/minor-v-happersett-is-binding-precedent-as-to-the-constitutional-definition-of-a-natural-born-citizen/ (June 24, 2011).
Thank you for all your hard work, and best of luck with your campaign for U.S. Senate. One would imagine there is nothing more fearful to Obama should he again usurp the presidency, than an honest Senator upholding the law of the land in keeping with one’s oath of office.
Respectfully submitted for your consideration,
Editor, ObamaBirthCertificate.net
June 22nd, 2012 @ 9:47 am
the problem there that the court did not go into details regarding one citizen parent aND oBAMA’S ATTORNEYS ARE USING THIS LOOPHOLE.
as I said, I included Minor in my pleadings, but you can’t limit your ballot challenge with Minor
June 22nd, 2012 @ 8:13 pm
Orly, please note a critical typo in the prior follow up comment to your kind reply, that is still pending approval at this time.
The sentence “If, as is evident in Article 2, Section 1, the Framers had need to exempt “a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption …” from being a NBC, then a NBC and a citizen cannot be not equal.”
should read:
If, as is evident in Article 2, Section 1, the Framers had need to exempt “a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption …” from being a NBC, then a NBC and a citizen cannot be equal.
As the post was a follow up to your reply meant for your consideration, with no need to make an additional public point, I prefer that you don’t post the comment with the typo if you please. If you do decide to post it, please be so kind to omit the word “not” from in between the words “cannot and equal.”
This post can be omitted too of course.
Thanks.
Editor, ObamaBirthCertificate.net
June 24th, 2012 @ 7:10 am
My Captain, My Captain, we finally brought ourselves to the meat of the meat (no fat now). I was not sure as I read your second thoughts on the stream lining of our approach, who wrote it; certainly could have been one of your colleagues in the hanging business.
But the main point is, you have looked with keen eyes at your case from the court’s point of view. Superb use of the eye balls. While the Editor (above) has some great points, I think your main point about the “both parents criterion” is a very good one. Drop it like a hot potato, my lady. It eats valuable time.
Orly, I have kicked around the idea of becoming a plaintiff. I will write another email to you explaining my library of articles (I have my own archive), I have written and who I wrote them to. But my final one, which I call my blog Entitled “Re the Criminal Side Of Barack Hussein Obama” will let you know exactly who received it. You will see on the final page of the blog the exact name and position of each person it was sent to.
I also still have my three letters to Director Mueller asking why is he not attacking the LT Harris murder. Then there are a number of letters to my congressman in the house, Bill Young and to the Speaker of the House, wherein I reamed him another exit hole for his BS. I will get my archive organized and will tell you the foremost meat in each one.
Will send the other email today, and if our cast iron skillet is still hanging from the ceiling – meaning the wife does not have it in her hands – I will try to slip another donation to you. Don’t count on any more 4 digits however LOL LOL.