OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

Draft of a new FOIA case being filed today in Washington DC

Posted on | July 28, 2011 | 16 Comments

DR. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ

ATTORNEY PRO SE

29839 SANTA MARGARITA PARKWAY, STE 100

RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA CA 92688

TEL: (949) 683-5411; FAX (949) 766-7603 

E-MAIL: ORLY.TAITZ@GMAIL.COM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE  DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Dr. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ, PRO SE                        §

                             Plaintiff,                                        § Freedom of information violation

                                                                                       §             5USC §552     

                   v.                                                                 §        CASE #    

                                                                                        §   

KATHY RUEMMLER in her capacity              §   

     as the White House counsel                          §   

   and custodian of  records                                § 

                                                                                       §

                                                                       §   oral argument requested

 

COMPLAINT

JURISDICTION

Current complaint is filed under Federal statute 5U.S.C. 552 Freedom of Information Act and diversity

PARTIES

Plaintiff, Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ, President of “Defend our Freedoms Foundation”, resident of California

Defendant, Kathy Ruemmler, in her official capacity as the White House Counsel, with business address in Washington DC

ALLEGATIONS

1. For a period of nearly three years Mr. Obama has kept hidden his long form birth certificate, attesting to his Natural Born status, which is a requirement for one to  become the U.S. President based on Article 2, section 1 of the U.S. Constitution.

2. Plaintiff  herein, Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ,(hereinafter “Taitz”)  is an attorney, who is a counsel in a legal action Barnett, Keyes, et al v Obama 8:09 cv 00082 USDC CD CA, and 10-55084 9th Circuit Court of Appeals,  dealing with Mr. Obama’s lack of the Natural Born status.

3. On MAY 2, 2011, Plaintiff was scheduled to conduct an oral argument in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Barnett, Keyes et al v Obama on the issue of Obama’s lack of eligibility.

4. On April 27. 2011, only a few days prior to an oral argument, and with polls showing 2/3 of the American public doubting his birth place and legitimacy, Mr. Obama released, what he alleged to be a true and correct copy of his original long form birth certificate maintained in the vault of the Health Department of Hawaii.

5. On the same day Mr. Obama, together with former White House counsel, Robert Bauer, conducted a press conference, attesting to the legitimacy of his birth certificate and attacking political dissident leaders and civil rights attorneys questioning his eligibility, by calling them “sideshow and carnival barkers”.

6. Mr. Obama and Mr. Bauer alleged, that Mr. Obama’s attorney Judith Curley travelled to Hawaii, received 2(two) separate certified copies of the original birth certificate, contained on file in the state department in Hawaii and delivered these two documents to the White House.

7. Mr. Obama and Mr. Bauer conducted a press conference and provided a white background copy of the document and made it available to the NBC reporter Savannah Guthrie and other reporters.

8. Another copy on secure green paper was posted on the official web site for the WhiteHouse.gov.

9. Within a short period of time multiple experts rendered an opinion, that the document posted on the White House.gov is not a true and correct copy of a 1961 original birth certificate, but a cheap forgery, a computer generated “document”, created by  cutting and pasting parts of different documents.

10. Printing and typesetting expert Paul Irey provided an affidavit (Exhibit 1), stating, that the document in question is clearly a forgery and contains letters and numbers from different type settings, which can be seen only in a forged document.

11. Adobe expert Chito Papa provided an affidavit, showing, that parts of the document were created in Adobe computer program in layers. (Exhibit 2)

12. Scanning and printing machines expert Douglas Vogt  has provided an affidavit, showing  kerning, different typesetting, different color, digital, color and grayscale intertwined imaging  and other signs of forgery. (Exhibit 3)

13. At the same time Taitz, Plaintiff herein, obtained verification from the Selective Service, that Obama is using a Connecticut birth certificate xxx-xx-4425, while Obama was never a resident of Connecticut (Exhibit 4, redacted selective Service certification of Barack Obama) (Exhibit 5, unredacted Selective Service certificate of Barack Obama submitted under seal) 

4. Social Security Verification systems provided a response, that the Social Security number in question xxx-xx-4425 was never issued to Barack Obama, which show that Obama is fraudulently using a social security number, which was never issued to him. This represents additional evidence pointing to lack of a valid  birth certificate, as typically individuals without a valid birth certificate have to resort to using invalid and fraudulently obtained social security numbers.(Exhibit 6 redacted Social Security Verification Systems letter ) (Exhibit 7, unredacted Social Security verification letter submitted under seal)

5. Taitz obtained from the Student Clearing house an official record of Obama’s attendance at the Columbia university, which shows him attending that university only for 9 (nine) month in contrast to Obama’s assertions, which points to the general pattern of fraud in relation to Obama’s vital records. (Exhibit 8 Student Clearing house certification of attendance of Columbia University by Obama for only 9 months.)

6. On June 1, 2011 USDC for the District of Columbia issued an order for the parties to file dispositive pleadings in Taitz v Astrue 11-cv-402 RCL, a case, where the same Plaintiff is seeking an original SS-5 application for Connecticut Social Security number xxx-xx-4425, which Mr. Obama is using according to his Selective Service certificate, but which was never assigned to him according to the Social Security administration (Exhibits 4, 5). This order was held by the clerks of the court and not posted on the electronic docket until June 3, 2011.

7. On June 2, 2011, as the above order was issued, but not docketed yet, the
White House counsel , Robert Bauer resigned and a new White House counsel, Kathy Ruemmler was appointed.

8. Next day, on June 3rd, Taitz forwarded to Ms. Ruemmler request for inspection of the two “certified copies” of the original long form birth certificate for Mr. Obama, which allegedly were hand carried  to the White House by Perkins Coie attorney, Ms. Judith Corley and provided to the public and reporters by the former White House counsel, another Perkins Coie attorney, Mr. Robert Bauer. Taitz requested inspection of those allegedly “certified copies”, that are now in Ruemmler’s custody.

 9. Ruemmler did not respond.

10. Taitz forwarded to Ruemmler a second request under 5 USC 552 Freedom of Information act.

11.Ruemmler did not respond.

12. In light of lack of response, overwhelming evidence of forgery and  general campaign of cover up and stone walling, further requests are futile.

13. FOIA provides  disclosure of  the public documents held by the agencies of the federal government.   

14. 5 USC 552 (6) private records exception does not apply in this case, as Barack Obama already made the document in question public by posting it on WhiteHouse.gov. At this point privacy is no longer at issue. The only issue is forgery, which can be ascertained by the inspection of the hard copies of the document.

15. Public interest in ascertaining, whether the person occupying the position of the U.S. President, is doing so based on a forged U.S. birth certificate, outweighs any possible privacy concerns.   Multi Ag, 515 F.3d at 1229-30; see, e.g., Barnard v. DHS, 598 F. Supp. 2d 1, 11 (D.D.C. 2009);  Schoenman v. FBI, 576 F. Supp. 2d 3, 9 (D.D.C. 2008); Unidad Latina En Accion v. DHS, 253 F.R.D. 44, 48 (D. Conn. 2008); Schoenman v. FBI, 573 F. Supp. 2d 119, 148 (D.D.C. 2008); Schoenman v. FBI, 575 F. Supp. 2d 136, 160 (D.D.C. 2008).  as the D.C. Circuit has held, “a privacy interest may be substantial — more than de minimis — and yet be insufficient to overcome the public interest in disclosure.”  

16. While 5 USC 552 excludes “central offices of the White House”, this exclusion will not apply in this case, as term “central offices of the White House” relates to the documentation obtained and generated by the President as part of his duties. A copy of a birth certificate  from 1961, 50 years ago, does not relate to the duties of the President, which commenced only two and a half years ago, this document relates to legitimacy of  Mr. Obama and his right to be in those “central offices of the White House” in the first place.    If he was never eligible to be there in the first place, he is not eligible to claim the privilege.   

17. This is the case of first impression, as  there was never a case in the U.S. history, when a person occupying the position of the U.S. President, did so, while using a forged birth certificate and attempting to defraud the public by posting on line, on White House.gov, an alleged computer generated, forged birth certificate.

 18. The closest  case in the U.S. history is United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974) , which originated in the DC court, when Hon. John Sirica granted the motion to compel subpoena by Leon Jaworski.  Judge Sirica’s decision was confirmed by the Supreme Court of the United States. Just as the Watergate tapes showed high probability of the criminal wrongdoing, which later indeed led to multiple criminal convictions,  there  is a high probability of criminal wrongdoing by Mr. Obama, former White House counsel Robert Bauer, Mr. Obama’s personal attorney Judith Corley of Perkins Coie, State Registrar, Hawaii Department of Health Alvin T. Onaka and a number of other individuals, which can be shown in hard copies of the alleged long form  1961 birth certificate of Mr. Obama, posted by Mr. Obama on the official White House website WhiteHouse.gov.

Wherefore Plaintiff respectfully requests this court to

1. Order the defendant to provide the plaintiff access for inspection of the two certified copies of the original long form birth certificate of Barack Obama, which are currently in possession of the White House counsel Mr. Kathy Ruemmler

2. Attorneys fees incurred by the Plaintiff, as counsel for the “Defend Our Freedoms Foundation” in attempting to obtain such documents under 5USC 552 FOIA

3. In light of the overwhelming public interest Plaintiff requests expedient processing of this complaint, as well as open court oral argument.  

/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, ste 100

Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688

ph 949-683-5411 fax 949-766-7603

orly.taitz@gmail.com

 

Service of process

I certify that a true and correct copy of the above pleadings were served on the defendant on 07.28. 2011 via certified mail

Kathy Ruemmler

White House Counsel

1600 Pennsylvania Ave

Washington DC 20500

US Attorney

District of Columbia

555 4th street NW

Washington DC, 20530

Office of the Attorney General

950 Pennsylvania Ave, NW

Washington DC 20530-00

/s/ Lila Dubert

cc Congressman Darrell Issa

Chairman

House Oversight Committee

2347 Rayburn House Building

Washington DC, 20515

cc Congressman Mike Rogers

Chairman

House Intelligence Committee

133 Cannon House Office building

Washington DC 20515

cc Congressman Sam Johnson

Chairman

House Subcommittee on Social Security

House Ways and Means Committee

2929 N Central Expy, 240

Richardson, TX 75080

cc Congressman Dana Rohrbacher

Chairman

House Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations’

House Committee on Foreign Affairs

2300 Rayburn House Building

Washington DC 20515

Category: HOT ITEMS!, Latest News, Legal Actions, LINKS, Obama Fraud Gate, Other Criminal or Suspicious Activities, Radio and Media Broadcasts, Supporting Documentation

Comments

16 Responses to “Draft of a new FOIA case being filed today in Washington DC”

  1. Alec
    July 28th, 2011 @ 8:45 am

    Excellent!
    Item 13 “Obama is using a Connecticut birth certificate” should read “Obama is using a Connecticut SS number”.
    Also, numbering of items needs correction.

  2. LittleCat'sFeet
    July 28th, 2011 @ 8:48 am

    Brilliant, Orly. Will Judge Lambert be appointed?

    Why don’t you file this in California, too?

  3. Pv
    July 28th, 2011 @ 8:58 am

    9 month is enough to give birth to a child!…referring to stay @ Columbia University…

  4. Hotlanta Mike
    July 28th, 2011 @ 9:11 am

    Good, another hole in the dike that the usurper criminal forger and fraudster has to try to plug.

  5. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    July 28th, 2011 @ 9:50 am

    thank you. I posted the draft, so I can get an input on typos before it goes to DC

  6. Francis Bovinemerde
    July 28th, 2011 @ 10:28 am

    Based on point 16 if they claim to be exempt from FOIA, isn’t that an admission that the birth certificate was produced by the White House (i.e. forgery)??? If that’s true, you should say that more clearly in the complaint.

  7. Another friend
    July 28th, 2011 @ 12:12 pm

    Correction:
    Wherefore Plaintiff respectfully requests this court to

    1. Order the defendant to provide the plaintiff access for inspection of the two certified copies of the original long form birth certificate of Barack Obama, which are currently in possession of the White House counsel Mr. Kathy Ruemmler
    CORRECTION: Ms Kathy not Mr.

  8. Orly Supporter
    October 25th, 2017 @ 6:58 pm

    Alright…Sic ’em, Orly!

    And hammer another nail in his coffin!

  9. turnright
    October 25th, 2017 @ 7:54 pm

    AND… this time around Orly, if you do it again, throw in his use of the stolen SSN that he put on his 2009 federal gift tax form. That nails him.

  10. Paula Hoehn
    October 25th, 2017 @ 9:28 pm

    Well done, Orly, and quick off the mark.

    Some very minor corrections:

    In Plaintiff area: columns possibly need vertical realignment

    In Item 6: comma possibly not required after the word alleged,

    Judith Corley not Judith Curley

    Space needed between 2(

    In Item 7: word wrap needed in paragraph to make the two lines more uniform in length.

    ———
    Paula Hoehn

  11. Paula Hoehn
    October 25th, 2017 @ 9:42 pm

    Dear Orly,

    This is too funny:

    In checking on the spelling of Judith Corley’s name, I saw this quote from her in 2010:

    “He doesn’t have a lot of personal legal issues, which is a good thing, I guess,” she says of Obama. “I hope it stays that way.”

    https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/meet_judith_corley_president_obamas_new_personal_lawyer/

    I am amazed that in her mind a total lack of ID documentation and non-eligibility under the Constitution would qualify as Obama not having “a lot of personal legal issues”.

    ——–
    Paula Hoehn

  12. turnright
    October 25th, 2017 @ 10:55 pm

    Paula I can see what Corley’s saying since Obama is a non-entity.

  13. W
    October 26th, 2017 @ 3:47 am

    We will not rest until he stands before a firing squad, sentenced to death by execution for treason

  14. 12th Generation American
    October 26th, 2017 @ 1:36 pm

    Good job Orly! We are behind you 100% as always! RB

  15. Tony
    October 27th, 2017 @ 3:31 pm

    Great!..Correct 13,that should reference Social Security, not Birth Certificate. .

  16. Harry
    October 30th, 2017 @ 5:37 am

    DEMOCRATs have a solid hold on the newsmedia and what they say about the Obama forged birth certificate-I am astounded by such solid
    evidence that is suppressed-

Leave a Reply