Draft of a motion to be submitted in Hi
Posted on | April 8, 2012 | 10 Comments
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
29839 Santa Margarita ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688
Ph 949-683-5411 fax949-766-7603
CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT HONOLULU, HAWAII
)
DR. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ )
PLAINTIFF
)
V ) CIVIL 11-1-1731-08
) HON. RHONDA NISHIMURA PRESIDING
LORETTA FUDDY IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS )
DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH )
STATE OF HAWAII, )
DR. ALVIN T. ONAKA, )
)
IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS )
THE REGISTRAR, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH )
STATE OF HAWAII )
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION DUE TO NEW INFORMATION
Comes now Plaintiff Orly Taitz, hereinafter Taitz and is seeking a disclosure under UIPA not of a long form birth certificate for Barack Obama, as it does not exist, but rather access to the book of birth record for 1961 and microfilm of the same to show that indeed a document posted by Obama on line on White House.gov is not listed among original 1961 birth certificates in the book of records and is not part of the original microfilm of such records.
Argument
Rule 60, Relief From Judgment or Order
(b) Mistakes; Inadvertence; Excusable Neglect; Newly Discovered Evidence Fraud, etc.
On motion and upon such terms as are iust, the court may relieve a party or a party’s legal
representative from a final judgment, order. or proceeding for the following reasons: (1)
mistake. inadvertence, surprise. or excusable neglect: (2) newly discovered evidence
due diligence which could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under Rule 59(b);
(l) fraud (whether heretofore denominated intrinsic or extrinsic). misrepresentation, or other
misconduct of an adverse party: (4) the judgment is void; (5) the judgment has been satisfied
released. or discharged. or a prior judgment upon which it is based has been reversed or
otherwise vacated. or it is no Ionger equitable that the judgment should have prospective application; or (6) any other reason Justifying relief from the operation other judgment. The
motion shall be made within a reasonable time and for reasons (l ). (2). and (3) Dot more than
one year after the judgment. Order or proceeding was entered or taken A motion under this
subdivision (b) does not affect the finality of a judgment or suspend its operation Hawaii Rules
of Civil Procedure Rule 60.
Plaintiff herein, submits a transcript of the administrative proceedings in Atlanta Georgia, where seven witnesses provided admissible, competent testimony, showing that the alleged copy of Obama’s birth certificate is a computer generated forgery. They also testified that the Social Security number used by Obama, is fraudulently obtained and represents a number issued in 1977 to another individual, an elderly resident of the State of Connecticut, who was born in 1890.Exhibit 1. On March 1, 2012, Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa county, Arizona, held a press conference, where he announced results of a six month investigation, where he confirmed the findings provided by Taitz. Taitz provides herein Exhibit 2, Transcript of the press conference by sheriff Arpaio and Exhibit 3, an actual Video tape of the January 26, 2012 administrative hearing in Atlanta Georgia and March 1, 2012 press conference by Sheriff Arpaio in Phoenix, Arizona as well as an Affidavit of authenticity.
The result of the investigation by sheriff Arpaio clearly show that the document is question is a computer generated forgery.
Investigator Zullo:
[32:11] “The fact that the Registrar’s Stamp and the April 25th Date Stamp appear
separately and independently of each other on separate links drew our attention to
the fact that they resided on separate independent layers. The fact that the Date
and Registrar’s stamp were linked and layered in this fashion brings us to the
conclusion that they were brought in from unknown sources and placed in the long
form birth certificate document released by Barack Obama to give the appearance of
legal certification.
[32:40] “Also troubling about the April 25th stamp and the Registrar’s Stamp is the
fact that both stamps can be lifted cleanly off the document and moved about the
birth certificate in one solid piece. It should be noted that none of the self proclaimed
computer experts claiming to be able to replicate the layers in Obama’s
long form birth certificate has been able to replicate this effect with the April 25th
Date Stamp and the Registrar’s stamp.
What Taitz is seeking is an opposite of what is usually done, it might seem like an outside of the box request, however it is perfectly logical and reasonable in light of the sworn testimony of the January 26, 2012 hearing in Farrar et al v Obama Exhibit 1, 3 and in light of the confirmation of such findings made by sheriff Joe Arpaio Exhibit 2, 3.
Aforementioned findings show that the alleged copy of Obama’s long form birth certificate posted by Obama on line, on WhiteHouse.gov is a computer generated forgery. Investigator Mike Zullo, who assisted sheriff Joe Arpaio, testified that this alleged birth certificate never existed in paper form. Layering of the document showed that the signature of the registrar and the date stamp reside on a different layer, that those were cut and pasted from different documents.
What does it mean? Pure and simple, it means that the Registrar of the department of Health Alvin Onaka and the Director of Health Loretta Fuddy are simply criminals, who have been complicit aiding and abetting Obama in the biggest case of elections fraud and forgery.
Sheriff Arpaio and investigator Zullo confirmed findings by Felicito Papa, who has over 10 years of use of Adobe Illustrator and similar programs and who is a graduate of Indiana institute of Technology. Exhibit 1
If law enforcement found that the stamp of the registrar was brought from another document, it means that defendant Onaka knew that he did not certify the document in question. This is a case of national importance. When Onaka saw Obama’s press conference on TV he knew that Obama, former White House counsel Bob Bauer and others involved were simply lying, were defrauding the nation. He knew that he never certified this document. His silence constituted fraud.
Defendant Fuddy went even further. If the signature of the Registrar was brought from another document, Fuddy knew that she did not copy the original document and did not give it to Onaka to stamp. Obama and Bauer presented a letter supposedly signed by Fuddy. Either Fuddy knew that the letter signed by her was a forgery as well or she wrote a letter and was complicit not only in fraud by being silent, but actively complicit by writing a letter to Obama, claiming that she personally copied a document.
Previously this court denied the motion for reconsideration using an unusual interpretation of the disclosure statute. While common sense tells you that the legislature has privacy statutes to protect information of one who wants it to be claimed private, not one, like Obama who is pointing the alleged records on the internet for millions of people to see. Now however Taitz is not aasking to review the photocopy of the alleged birth certificate as according to Sheriff Arpaio and investigator Zullo such document never existed, it was created on computer sometimes recently. now Taitz is simply demanding verification that the document does not exist.
At this point the court does not have any excuse or any justification for denying the motion. Taitz is not asking the court to disclose any document, as it was shown that the document does not exist. Taitz is asking this court to allow for her and her forensic document experts to examine 1961 book of records and microfilm in order to simply confirm the law enforcement findings.
For example, if Taitz were to request such a confirmation for herself, it would not be an infringement on anybody’s privacy rights to simply confirm that Taitz was not born in Hawaii and there is no long form birth certificate for her.
Similarly, as Arpaio, Zullo, Papa, and Sampson have shown, there is no original long form birth certificate for Obama, it does not exist, it is a computer generated forgery posted by Obama on line. If this court will refuse such a simple request, this court will become criminally complicit in ObamaForgeryGate as well.
It is not a secret that Hawaii is a stronghold for the Democratic party. Lately the state government was run as an incestual little clique, with the Governor being an old friend of Obama’s family, the Attorney General being a fellow Occi grad and an Obama fan and Deputy Attorney General in charge of the Health Department Nagamine being married to Obama family attorney Todao Nagamine. However, even in this “all stays in the family” environment there is a limit at which a court of law has to stop and balk. Honorable Rhonda Nishimura cannot become one of individuals actively aiding and abetting forgery and fraud. Time came for this court to state “Enough is enough, up to here. I will not risk being thrown off the bench and going to prison to cover up for Obama’s forgery”.
REQUEST TO RULE ON THE PLEADINGS WITHOUT AN ORAL ARGUMENT
Plaintiff is a resident of California and travel to Hawaii is costly. Plaintiff travelled to Hawaii 5 times on this case and is greatly concerned that prior oral arguments were scheduled with preconceived decisions in mind and the magnitude of the issue was simply ignored. Statute 338 was interpreted in a fashion that defied logic and made sense only for the purpose of keeping the truth hidden. Due to these concerns Plaintiff is requesting a ruling on the pleadings. New evidence of fraud and forgery committed in relation to Obama’s alleged copy of his birth certificate is overwhelming, it is staggering. There is no excuse or justification in not allowing to open the books simply to confirm that the document in question is not authentic and was not created in 1961, as claimed by Obama.
If this court decides not to grant this motion on the pleadings based on the evidence provided, there is nothing the Plaintiff can add in the oral argument, in order to change the mind of the court.
A copy of this motion is being forwarded to the US House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary, Oversight committee, Inspector General of the Department of Justice, Public Integrity Unit of the Department of Justice, Commission on the Human Rights Defenders of the United Nations and the Inter-American commission on Human Rights, as Plaintiff is greatly concerned by the fact that the Human rights and Constitutional rights of 311 million American citizens were infringed upon by criminality of some in the government of the state of Hawaii and unwillingness of the office of the Attorney General of Hawaii and the Judiciary of the state of Hawaii to address this issue on the merits and prosecute Director of Health Fuddy and Registrar of the Department of Health Onaka for their criminal complicity in the biggest case of elections fraud in the history of this nation and in the usurpation of the US Presidency by Barack Obama, an individual with forged birth certificate, forged selective service certificate and a stolen Social Security number.
Conclusion
Plaintiff is respectfully requesting
1. In light of the sworn testimonies in Farrar v Obama( 2012 CV 211398 Administrative court of GA) and announcement of forgery by sheriff Joe Arpaio to reverse prior ruling and order the defendants to allow inspection of the 1961 book of birth records and microfilm for the purpose of confirmation and verification that indeed there is no original genuine 1961 long form birth certificate for Barack Obama
2. Sua sponte order deputy attorney General Nagamine or another specially appointed attorney from the office of the Attorney General to conduct criminal investigation and prosecution of the findings of forgery in Obama’s alleged copy of the birth certificate and investigate and prosecute all the individuals involved in that matter.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
CERTIFICATION
I, Lila Dubert, attest that I am over 18 years old, not a party to this case and I served on 04.09.2012 a copy of this complaint on the defendants through their attorney Deputy Attorney General Nagamine.
/s/ Lila Dubert
Comments
10 Responses to “Draft of a motion to be submitted in Hi”
Leave a Reply
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
April 8th, 2012 @ 6:40 pm
Dr. Neal Palafox proved to be a decent & honorable man who respects the rule of law. When Gov Abercrombie discussed what he would need to do in order to conceal the fraud & forgery Abercrombie was met with resistance. That’s when Fuddy came along. Senator Sam Slom went to bat for Dr. Palafox to no avail. Fuddy accepted payoff and there is no doubt in my mind. Thank You Dr. Palafox for rejecting evil.
April 8th, 2012 @ 6:51 pm
can someone get in touch with him? Will he appear at the hearing?
April 8th, 2012 @ 7:12 pm
I spoke with Thomas Ballantyne about Dr. Palafox yesterday. He has almost become a forgotten man over the past year yet he is so vital. I sent an E-Mail to Senator Slom about contacting him. I will keep you posted. Also, Tom was going to ask Mike Zullo if he has interviewed him yet and let me know. He knows things but he has to be harboring animosity after the treatment he received. I am convinced he would be of great value if he would talk.
April 9th, 2012 @ 12:53 am
Um, you still haven’t submitted an evidence or witness list.
Tick Tock….
April 9th, 2012 @ 2:48 am
why should I, genius?
April 9th, 2012 @ 2:58 am
You crack me up. Did you include the Administrative Judge’s opinion? He didn’t really find the “testimony” of your idiotic witnesses believable, did he? You have absolutely no evidence of anything. You don’t even know what evidence is. And the idiot sheriff from AZ and his cold case posse have no clue. You can’t claim something is a forgery when you haven’t even seen the actual scanned document. That’s just bull crap. Motion denied!
April 9th, 2012 @ 4:15 am
Bol ogna, your comment is appropriately bologna.
Arpaio and others have shown that what our criminal in chief put on line is not a real document, but a computer generated composite. Anyone with half a brain (let’s hope these judges have at least half a brain) can understand that if Obama were to have a valid document, he would not be posting on line a computer generated forgery. so enough with your bologna obot, go get a life
April 9th, 2012 @ 12:01 pm
Black’s on evidence. Read it. Learn it. Live it.
🙂
April 10th, 2012 @ 12:15 am
Hmmm…it appears that the (D)’s coming to Ms are a little concerned, Orly. Notice how they have to keep “chirping” about some list…! How come, guys? Are you nervous about something?
And Paul…the plaintiffs have done a great job of tearing the fabric of the defendents case, every which way but loose! And the time will come that will show you and other garbage posters what posting of truth is all about!!! Maybe you missed the one post that discusses what “inside” info has revealed?!
Since you and Abu aren’t experts, just accept the fact that your posts are nothing more then babblings!!
April 10th, 2012 @ 12:30 am
Orly: also wanted to say that once again, you do a very thorough job on your presenting a Notification! A terrific job! You are very detailed and bring out the very important items to build a very strong case!
I would think that they would just get tired of having you “show” your skills and prowess as a Civil Rights Attorney! They are getting to be dumbfounded after all this. And it seems that their House of Cards (IS) now extremely “shakey!!!
Excellent job, Dr!