Clarification on New Hampshire ballot challenge: I never got one cent from Article 2 PAC or any organizations by Gary Wilmott
Posted on | December 26, 2011 | 18 Comments
I wanted to clarify one thing. Today there is only one challenge going on in New Hampshire: this challenge is a law suit, that I filed with the Supreme Court of New Hampshire. There are no other challenges filed. Several candidates on the ballot and several state representatives joined me as co-plaintiffs. I spent days preparing all the pleadings and paid for all the fees and costs associated with this challenge.
I got an e-mail stating that Article 2 PAC and organizations by Gary Wilmott are sponsoring New Hampshire challenge. I wanted to clarify, that I never got any money from Article 2 PAC or Gary Wilmott or his organizations.
Gary and a few other individuals sent some e-mails and tried to bring more representatives to join me, however, they did not succeed. 5 representatives, who joined me in the Supreme Court, are the same ones, who joined me before and during the ballot law committee hearing. While Gary is a nice person and has good intentions, he was not able to add any more representatives, aside from ones who supported me from the beginning without any input by Gary Wilmott. No new representatives joined.
Gary is trying to send e-mails to residents of NH, however I do not know, what will it accomplish. The case was already filed, it is in front of the judges and it is up to them. 4 out of 5 judges were nominated by the Democrat governors of NH: Jane Shaheen and John Lynch, which means that they will probably stonewall and I will need to go to the Supreme Court. That is the truth of the matter.
A number of people started blogs. Some of those blogs have bombastic names, like Article 2 pack or other names where all of these people are calling these blogs organizations and they are calling themselves directors of these organizations and all of them are seeking donations, selling merchandise, looking for a Santa Clause (big donor) or planing meetings or summits and soliciting donations for those meetings, which would cost thousands of dollars.
Please, keep in mind, that at the end of the day we need one law suit to succeed. At the end of the day I am the attorney, who is working 24/7/365 for 3 years now, bringing those legal actions around the country and paying for all the filing fees, copying, biding, Fed Ex, airfare and hotels traveling around the country. I was attacked by judges, who are puppets of the regime, and media and by bogus law suits filed by convicted criminals. I spent thousands of dollars fighting all of these challenges.
When you donate to this effort, think, who is actually doing the work.
I can continue bringing legal challenges around the country without all of these newly made up organizations, as long as you are donating, however think for a moment, what all of these organizations with bombastic names achieved so far or will achieve without an attorney, who is actually doing the work? We’ve seen mock trials, which were completely ignored by the media and Congress. There were and will be meetings of a few birthers here and there under different names, however typically media completely ignores those meetings, courts and Congress ignore them also. No court will issue a ruling pronouncing Obama ineligible, because 5 or 10 or 20 birthers decided to meet somewhere. No court will issue a ruling because a few residents got an e-mail. No court will decide to remove Obama from the ballot because of something written by someone on his blog or Internet magazine. I am concerned that this cottage industry of multiple individuals starting blogs, calling those blogs organizations, themselves directors of organizations will only stretch thin very limited resources and will impede my ability to file legal actions in different states and actually challenge Obama.
People asked me to show the E-mail in question, here it is below. You can see a notation there “Article II PAC is our finanacing arm” and “article II super PAC donation page”. I honestly exposed to the public the fact, that there is only one ballot challenge in NH, which was filed by me and which is in the Supreme court of NH and I did not receive 1 cent, absolutely nothing from this Article II PAC. None of the state representatives or candidates paid me anything, my work is completely dependant on donations from the public. When all of these organizations mushroom, they drain very limited resources.
NEW HAMPSHIRE BALLOT CHALLENGE
IT CAN BE SUCCESSFUL
This is a call for help from one of America’s most strident and tireless defenders of our Constitution. Gary and his organizations are making extraordinary headway in New Hampshire.
See the letter from Give Us Liberty founder Gary below:
Give Us Liberty
December 24, 2011
Hello Fellow Patriots,
I just want you to know that there is a group of fellow patriots who have been working tirelessly on the New Hampshire Ballot Challenge. We are on the phone with people on the ground in New Hampshire and we are talking to courageous NH state reps who will not back down on this issue. There are many activities planned and so much to do in the next two weeks. We have already instituted a phone-in program to NH talk radio and have two sympathetic local stations targeted for the next two weeks. I will be emailing details about how you can help get the message out shortly. With your help, we CAN make a difference!
The citizens of New Hampshire need to be informed that their Ballot Commission has betrayed their trust. The Commission failed to vet Obama in the face of overwhelming evidence that he is not constitutionally qualified to be on the ballot. We must educate the New Hampshire voters of the impending voter fraud and ensure that the laws of New Hampshire be upheld. If we can’t get Obama off the ballot we can impact his vote and send a message to the rest of the nation. Your efforts can also help persuade the New Hampshire Supreme Court to listen to the appeal about the Ballot Commission’s blatant misconduct and disregard for the law.
We need help right now however to finance an email blast that will reach 118,000 New Hampshire residents. We have been assured that the email contacts are 80% accurate. We can pull this off for only $2000! We have already raised about $800. We need the additional $1,200 asap. Any funds in excess of the $2,000 will be put towards a NH mailing campaign right before the primary.
If anyone in this group can donate $5, $10 or $20 you can be assured that it will be put towards this project! The ARTICLE II PAC has agreed to assist with this effort and all donations should be sent to their address. [SEE BELOW]
If you can not donate a small (large is good too ) amount of money…we are in need of volunteers to do data input in EXCEL spreadsheet as we are currently developing a contacts list of residents in New Hampshire. If you can help in anyway, please contact me. Also let me know if you are interested in the radio call-in efforts.
Seriously, it’s time to step up and help. We have an anti-American fraud in the White House who is destroying our country and shredding the Constitution. PLEASE do your part. Every bit will help.
Article II Pac is our financing arm
Please
Contribute
now.
Any amount would help- $5-10-25-???
With a little help, this could be the start of an avalanche of press coverage and the end of Mr. Occupy White House.
If everyone that reads this would send just $5 this constitutional campaign will blast off like a Patriot Missile. The wall of corruption is beginning to crumble, help those that have worked so hard in this effort by donating a $5 sledge hammer.
Regards,
Dwight
this is a response to this clarification, that I got from a number of supporters:
Amen, Orly! I had wondered myself what all these different organizations were going to accomplish. I think your letter below needed to be written to put things in perspective. You’re the last (wo)man standing; please don’t give up!
Kathy Gotto
Comments
18 Responses to “Clarification on New Hampshire ballot challenge: I never got one cent from Article 2 PAC or any organizations by Gary Wilmott”
Leave a Reply
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
December 26th, 2011 @ 6:03 pm
I agree. More lawyers are needed to file actual legal challenges to will bring a possible viable result. People shouldn’t expect a monetary reward for what they are doing but the reward of Obama NOT being elected. People have to contribute their own time and energy to the cause if don’t want Obama reelected. More lawyers are needed.
December 26th, 2011 @ 6:11 pm
Had I known that you not get money from Gary, I not send him money. But now I already send $2,000 and have no more for you. You should tell him you need the money as he is getting it for you.
December 26th, 2011 @ 6:26 pm
Why aren’t, your friends, like Pam Barnett and Dean Haskins, raising, money for you and your courageous legal efforts? Why, are they wasting, time and money on silly, meetings and fancy websites?
December 26th, 2011 @ 7:14 pm
no, they are not raising money for me. Dean has passed through me a donation to Leah Lax to put her on the ballot. I immediately forwarded that donation to Leah
December 26th, 2011 @ 7:15 pm
this sounds like something written by an Obot
December 26th, 2011 @ 9:12 pm
Dean Haskins is working on a special lawsuit with Hawaii to get Obama’s records. He claims he can’t talk about it but I wish he would reveal something. Orly, you should take your plaintiff from the Carter case and use him to get Obama’s records since he qualifies under provision #5 of HRS 338-18; Having a common ancestor with Obama. Although, Hawaii DOH probably refuses to honor the direct and tangible interest, the statute makes it clear that you have one. Having a direct and tangible interest will make it easier for you to advance other arguments as well.
December 26th, 2011 @ 9:19 pm
Why do you always, call me an Obot? I reject that, title. I am one of, your biggest, supporters.
Anyway, I am sending your, campaign a BIG CHECK so you will know my real, name, and I will put “Insight” on it in the lower left.
December 26th, 2011 @ 9:27 pm
he claims, that he is an 8th cousin. Even if it is true, I doubt HI will consider it close enough of a relationship
December 27th, 2011 @ 1:47 am
Dr. Orly,
You should nevertheless try to work this plaintiff and argument into your Hawaii lawsuit. The Hawaii DOH has continued to maintain that you doesn’t have a direct or tangible interest in Obama’s records under HRS 338-18. The court will most likely agree and you will be blocked. However, if you raise this argument, the Hawaii DOH can no longer make that argument when in fact you do have direct and tangible interest in the record in so far as Hawaii DOH refuses to honor it. The court will then be more inclined to be more open as you advance other arguments for acknowledging that you dobhave a direct and tangible interest in the record. The provision under HRS 338-18 does not limit the scope of a common ancestor so I think there is plenty of room for argumentation on this point.
December 27th, 2011 @ 7:04 am
that will be the day 🙂
December 27th, 2011 @ 8:30 am
> The provision under HRS 338-18 does not limit the scope of a common ancestor
Well the line’s gotta be somewhere, after all we’ve all descended from Adam and Eve, didn’t we?
December 27th, 2011 @ 9:35 am
🙂
there’s always just six degrees of separation
December 27th, 2011 @ 9:28 pm
Problems with Article 2 Super PAC…
Uneducated voters is not the problem in New Hampshire,
The problem is ignorant elected “officals”.
December 30th, 2011 @ 12:52 am
I believe, that Helen Tansey is not helping, but just diverting funds. She never filed any law suits against Obama, she never donated 1 cent and only engaged in bad mouthing me. During my case in Carter’s courtroom, she promoted Pastor Manning’s “trial of the century”. While pastor Manning is a good man, everyone knew, that it was not a real trial, will lead nowhere and it just hurt my fundraising during Carter trial. Now, when I need to spend thousands of dollars, travelling to HI, GA, NH and other states and flying witnesses, she came up with a new gimmick, which will only divert funds and will make it impossible for me to pay to fly to locations and to fly witnesses
December 30th, 2011 @ 5:17 am
Dr. Taitz,
have you realized that Gary Wilmott uses your e-mail list for fundraising ?
Your
European
December 30th, 2011 @ 5:43 am
he does not, I did not giver it to him and you are inciting more discourse. I provided clarification, the issue is resolved and we are moving on. Removing Obama from office and prosecuting him for fraud is number 1 goal
December 30th, 2011 @ 1:25 pm
Dr. Taitz,
you did not give it to him. But – he uses your e-mail list anyway. How did he steal it ?
Your
European
December 30th, 2011 @ 1:40 pm
he did not steal anything. As I stated before, he is a good man, I just needed to clarify what happened in NH. I clarified, that it