OrlyTaitzEsq.com

First Amended Reply to motion

U.S. District Court District of Columbia Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was entered on 9/24/2010 at 4:48 PM and filed on 9/24/2010 Case Name: TAITZ v. OBAMA Case Number: 1:10-cv-00151-RCL Filer: ORLY TAITZ WARNING: CASE CLOSED on 04/14/2010 Document Number: 37     Docket Text: REPLY to opposition to motion re [34] MOTION […]

Joint FBI and IRS investigation of corrupt judges

Michelle Submitted on 2010/09/21 at 4:25am Dear Dr. Orly-same corruption, different state, in case anyone needs this case for reference. This is one of the many reasons Cook County is called the cesspool of corruption from whence Obama sprang. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Greylord Operation Greylord was an investigation conducted jointly by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the […]

Follow up on Prof Ronald Rotunda story

Redd Submitted on 2010/09/17 at 4:28am You are quite popular. I am wondering what your take is on this article that came out in the Chicago Tribune yesterday by your friend Rotunda? https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/ct-oped-0916-birthright-20100916,0,4594378.story State Representative Cynthia Davis R-MO and writer Jane Jamison signed up as my friends on my new Facebook page 0 #   […]

An interesting idea from my supporter in FL

One of my supporters in FL(who wanted to stay anonymous)  suggested, that I should announce that I will reimburse my supporters, who are contributing to help me pay $20,000 in sanctions and fight this assault on Constitution, after I win the case and get $20,000 back from Obama and/or Department of Justice. I will be happy to […]

9th Ciscuit Court of Appeals gives Obama an extra month to answer to my Appeal

09-56827 Wiley Drake, et al v. Barack Obama, et al “Clerk Order Filed” InboxX  Reply |ca9_ecfnoticing@ca9.uscourts.gov to me show details 12:26 PM (1 hour ago) ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic […]

update on 4 legal actions and collections

From August 9 I got $6,281 of the $20,000 judicial extortion to keep me and all of you as silent slaves about illegitimacy of the Kenyan usurper. I need to collect $13,719. It appears the military has no intention of upholding the Constitution against all enemies: foreign and domestic, it was reported that at today’s […]

9th Circuit Court of Appeals has referred my Case: Barnett, Keyes et al v Obama et al for mediation for Oct. 4 at 11am. There will be only 3 attorneys at this mediation conference: Myself, Assist US attorney Roger West and Assist. U.S. attorney David DeJute. I will keep you posted regarding the outcome of the conference.

10-55084 Pamela Barnett, et al v. Barack Obama, et al “Mediation Order Filed” InboxX  Reply |ca9_ecfnoticing@ca9.uscourts.gov to me show details 11:29 AM (2 hours ago) ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic […]

Motion for Reconsideration was filed with the Supreme Court of the United States. A PDF copy with all the images and exhibits will be posted and available shortly

No. 10A56 In The Supreme Court of the United States Rhodes     v.   MacDonald   MOTION FOR RECONSIFERATION OF THE APPLICATION FOR EMERGENCY STAY AND/OR INJUNCTION AS TO THE SANCTIONS DUE TO NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE OF FRAUD ON THIS HONORABLE COURT, FORGERY OF PASSPORT RECORDS, UTTERING, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, COMMITTED BY BARACK HUSSEIN […]

World Net Daily is covering my cases

  BORN IN THE USA Supremes looking at eligibility, again   California lawyer’s question referred to court for review   Posted: August 12, 2010 9:55 pm Eastern  By Bob Unruh © 2010 WorldNetDaily   Orly Taitz   A California attorney who more than a year ago told WND she would go back again and again to the […]

My case will be heard by all 9 Justices of the Supreme Court. Whether they will actually read a word, or it will be decided by the same clerks, remains to be seen. There were no signatures of any Justices in Lightfoot v Bowen and no signature on prior “denial” by Thomas

  U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito refers Orly Taitz issue to entire court     Columbus Ledger-Enquirer  August 11, 2010 By Alan Riquelmy, Columbus Ledger-Enquirer, Ga. Aug. 11–U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has referred to the entire court a request from “birther” attorney Orly Taitz to have her $20,000 in sanctions dismissed. U.S. District […]

Very biased, one sided coverage of ObamaFraudGate by America on Line

  Elena Kagan Sworn In as Fourth Woman on Supreme Court WikiLeaks to Publish New Documents 70 People Involved in Brawl at DC Transit Station Taliban Killings Could Cool U.S. Missionary Impulse Ariz. Prison Escapees Linked to NM Killings ADL ‘Stunned’ By Zakaria’s Decision to Return Prize Vegetables Eyed in Salmonella Outbreak Linked to Taco […]

No answer from Justice Samuel Alito yet

Supreme court clerks are at it again and are not docketing my resubmission to justice Alito

you can reach the Supreme Court at 202-479-3000 202-479-3472 and demand an answer, why didn’t they docket resubmission brief, which was confirmed as received by the clerk’s office. In my resubmission to Alito, just like in the original to Thomas (whose signature is missing on the order to deny) I am asking to stay the […]

According to the clerks office: there is no order signed by justice Thomas

Today, 07.26.10 at 8:15 PST/11:15 EST I talked to the clerks office of the  Supreme Court of the United States, with an employee of the Clerks office by name Eric Fossum. I requested a copy of the order actually  signed by Justice Thomas, denyng my application for stay of sanctions  in Rhodes v MacDonald #10A56. Mr. Eric […]

What happened in the Supreme Court of CA

On July 13 I sent my application to the Supreme Court of CA. They received it on 14th. The same day the chief judge Ronald M. George announced his resignation. See the article below. The next day I got a message that they reviewed my application En Banc and denied it. Please, look at the order. Do […]

« go back — keep looking »