Hearing in Capt Connie Rhodes MD case
Posted on | September 15, 2009 | 19 Comments
This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended.
***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply.
U.S. District Court [LIVE AREA]
Georgia Middle District
Notice of Electronic Filing
| Case Name: | Rhodes v. MacDonald et al |
| Case Number: | 4:09-cv-106 |
| Filer: | |
| Document Number: | 12 |
Docket Text:
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Clay D. Land: Motion Hearing held on 9/14/2009. Written Order to follow (Attachments: # (1) Exhibits) (tlf).
4:09-cv-106 Notice has been electronically mailed to:
Sheetul S. Wall Sheetul.S.Wall@usdoj.gov, Alison.Jasper@usdoj.gov, usagam.ecf@usdoj.gov, veronica.jones@usdoj.gov
Orly Taitz dr_taitz@yahoo.com
Rebecca Elaine Ausprung rebecca.ausprung@us.army.mil
4:09-cv-106 On this date, a copy of this document, including any attachments filed with this document, has been mailed by United States Postal Service to any non CM/ECF participants in this case as indicated below::
The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:
Comments
19 Responses to “Hearing in Capt Connie Rhodes MD case”
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
September 15th, 2009 @ 8:07 pm
whats this mean….
September 15th, 2009 @ 8:21 pm
what does it mean?
September 15th, 2009 @ 9:01 pm
What was the minute order???
September 15th, 2009 @ 10:01 pm
What does this mean?
September 15th, 2009 @ 10:26 pm
How do we read this?
September 16th, 2009 @ 1:10 am
Mrs. L…you plagiarized my comment:)
September 16th, 2009 @ 7:50 am
The minutes say this:
1:55 PM– Court informed parties an Order would be entered no later than Wednesday, September 16, a(t) Noon.
So a ruling by noon E.S.T. on Wed., 9/16. For any case, you can go to http://www.scribd.com and enter the case number in scribd’s search (in this case it is
4:09-cv-106 –or the full 4:09-cv-106- CDL ) and all documents for a case will come up. You can also open a PACER account.
If you want to copy and paste into browser the link is :
https://www.scribd.com/doc/19789978/RHODES-v-MacDONALD-11-Minute-Entry-for-proceedings-held-before-Judge-Clay-D-Land-Motion-Hearing-held-on-9142009-Written-Order-to-follow-Rh
September 16th, 2009 @ 8:40 am
I heard the Rhodes case reported / discussed on Atlanta radio this morning. The first time I have heard it reported in the MSM in the Atlanta area. Thank you for your hard work. The word is getting out. Regardless of the outcome of this case, people are beginning to pay attention to the cause and issue.
September 16th, 2009 @ 9:00 am
Any judge with an ounce of fidelity to his oath would and should discover the truth about Obama and his qualifications since no other law must be satisfied before the supreme law, the constitution. Should a judge discover a defect it would then be an entirely different case and legitimately delay or even settle the case being brought. The ONLY reason a sworn upholder of the law would place artificial rules, common law, states laws, congressional law or any other barrier between the supreme law and the upholding of it would be to diminish that constitutional law by removing its protections from the people.
“In short, when human laws contradict or discountenance the means, which are necessary to preserve the essential rights of any society, they defeat the proper end of all laws, and so become null and void.”
Alexander Hamilton
The Founders Constitution
Volume 1, Chapter 3, Document 5
https://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/
“It is not otherwise to be supposed that the constitution could intend to enable the representatives of the people to substitute their will to that of their constituents. It is far more rational to suppose that the courts were designed to be an intermediate body between the people and the legislature, in order, among other things, to keep the latter within the limits assigned to their authority.”
Alexander Hamilton
Federalist #78
Founders Constitution
Volume 1, Chapter 17, Document 24
https://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/v1ch17s24.html
In other words nobody, not even congress by any act or omission, can alter the force of the constitution or its intent.
Orly, you are doing your best to present the injury to the people and no judge should hold that we the people must prove anything. On the contrary, it is the duty of every sworn judge to uphold the constitution regardless of any other thing. No injury is required to enforce the supreme law. It is ours and is not to be challenged, litigated, usurped, etc. by anyone. The oath states fidelity to protect and uphold, that is enough in itself to demand discovery of undiscovered qualifications we are entitled to. All who have it in their power to support and defend must do so or violate their oath. Unless this judge has proof to the contrary he himself must question the legitimacy now that that question is before him and as yet unproven by anyone.
September 16th, 2009 @ 11:07 am
GOOD POINT
In that, Orly Taitz should be demanding of the Judge as should the Judge in California that the US Attorneys get out of court as it is a conflict of interest in their defending Barak Obama against the people of the United States who they are sworn to defend.
Ms. Taitz should be demanding that Mr. Obama in this private matter produce private attorneys and that the US Justice begin proceedings to assist her cases against Citizen Kenya.
The Judge should have thrown those US Attorneys out the first day and ordered Obama to produce his own counsel or the Judge would rule immediately for Obama’s records to be released in full to the American people.
September 16th, 2009 @ 1:42 pm
I think this may be a link to it?
https://www.scribd.com/doc/19789978/RHODES-v-MacDONALD-11-Minute-Entry-for-proceedings-held-before-Judge-Clay-D-Land-Motion-Hearing-held-on-9142009-Written-Order-to-follow-Rh
September 16th, 2009 @ 1:42 pm
This the site/correct link, looks like it to me?
https://www.scribd.com/doc/19789978/RHODES-v-MacDONALD-11-Minute-Entry-for-proceedings-held-before-Judge-Clay-D-Land-Motion-Hearing-held-on-9142009-Written-Order-to-follow-Rh
September 16th, 2009 @ 1:45 pm
Think this is the site for that info.
For some reason my posts are not showing, so will break this link up and see if it works this way
https://www.scribd.com/doc/19789978/RHODES-v-MacDONALD-11-
Minute-Entry-for-proceedings-held-before-Judge-Clay-D-Land-Motion-Hearing-held-on-9142009-Written-Order-to-follow-Rh
September 16th, 2009 @ 3:21 pm
I think that Judge Land never read the Constitution or that he dose not believe that it important enough to enforce it. Did he take an oath to protect our Constitution ??
September 16th, 2009 @ 3:30 pm
Orly – go back in and tell Judge Land that because Nobama only has I citizen parent (if that), he is not a citizen under the Vattel definition of n.b.c. How could he have missed that? It is an outrageous decision. I hope Captain Connie understands that we in this cause owe her and you a great debt of gratitude. I am sending you more money today via PAYPAL. Keep up the good fight! Go back in and tell Judge Land about Vattel. Or take an immediate appeal TODAY to the circuit court and get your TRO there! And ask for more discovery. Especially in the case in Santa Anita!
September 16th, 2009 @ 5:53 pm
Orly.
This ‘Logical Analysis’ should be presented to Judge Land.
Go here for the text that I sent to this site. (take out the spaces in the url)
h t t p://w w w.australia.to/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=13588:the-logical-analysis-of-a-natural-born-citizen&catid=73:politics&Itemid=199
September 16th, 2009 @ 6:16 pm
@Jeepers Vattel doesn’t apply to our law, as US law was based on English Common law, not Sweedish books
@Kristen Too bad our court system is “presumed innocent until proven guilty,” huh? I can only imagine what would happen if the burden of proof was on the defendant in EVERY case.
September 16th, 2009 @ 6:39 pm
The human race is plagued with the same characteristics that emanate from millions of years of evolution. We know from the books that were written thousands of years ago how human behavior is arbitrary and ambiguous. Humans have not changed one bit in their emotional make ups.
The physicians, scribes, and merchants were thrown out of the temple…and they are back again in America’s temple.
Greed, avarice, etc are prevalent…with humans and in the animal kingdom.
This creep Arlen or whatever it is, that IT is called,has passed judgement on Orly when he should’ve passed judgement on the one’s not qualified to be employed in sewers.
Why is it that the JERK Arlen has sided with two drug abusers, jail birds,, and whatever else that they are as humans?
Anyone named ARLEN has to be someone who i would’ve never dealt with…names usually tie to personalities…anyone named ARLEN has to be an ass, in my book
Apuzzo has a good case going…Donofrio, Berg, Orly and the judges Land and carter all have differing opinions …so for any layman to pick sides in this issue other than common side of getting the RAT out our house would be away off base with criticizing drOrly.
This case is All NEW for the courts, judges, electorate, etc. It is a case of FIRST IMPRESSIONS that needs to have a precedence set to the facts….
September 18th, 2009 @ 1:01 pm
We need to all write to Judge Clay Land at 120 12th Street, PO Box 124, Columbus, GA 31902 and let him know what a fool he is to call this a “frivilous” case. Be as respectful as possible, although I myself will find it hard to do!