Attorney General of HI states, that the director of Health Loretta Fuddy will not comply with the subpoena and will not provide access to original BC due to reasons of privacy. How is it private, when he posted the copy on Whitehouse.com. It’s not privacy, it’s forgery, stupid
Posted on | June 14, 2011 | 14 Comments
Category: Help Needed, HOT ITEMS!, Latest News, Legal Actions, Letters from Readers and Patriots, Letters/Feedback from Readers, LINKS, Obama Fraud Gate, Other Criminal or Suspicious Activities, Supporting Documentation
Comments
14 Responses to “Attorney General of HI states, that the director of Health Loretta Fuddy will not comply with the subpoena and will not provide access to original BC due to reasons of privacy. How is it private, when he posted the copy on Whitehouse.com. It’s not privacy, it’s forgery, stupid”
Leave a Reply
June 14th, 2011 @ 9:50 am
Orly, everyone has a common ancestor; so, you are entitled to gain access to the records.
June 14th, 2011 @ 10:07 am
I really liked the comment by nbmurray@frontiernet.net, however, IF we refer to our Heavenly Father as the original “common ancestor”, we possibly may NOT have the same Father! Jesus told some scoffers (who claimed to have God as their Father) that they were of their father, the devil!
So, Obama may, or may not, share the same original “Common Ancestor”. LOL!
(Actually, it’s not really a LOL matter!) [sigh]
June 14th, 2011 @ 10:34 am
I don’t see why HI. now won’t release the supposed original now that Obama has released a supposed “real” copy ….unless there really isn’t a REAL OPRIGINAL…it’s that simple it is either/or, one or the other since Obummer released his fraudulent BC.
It has now been made an issue of public domain
since Obama released tis and ther is no real issue of privacy for Obummer anymore
June 14th, 2011 @ 10:42 am
Wasn’t O’Bama recently in Ireland visiting his homeland? Certainly there are some relatives about on the Irish side of the family willing to make such a request of the HDOH…
June 14th, 2011 @ 12:53 pm
I believe the Attorney General of Hawaii, along with Director of Health Loretta Fuddy, are part of an ongoing criminal conspiracy to cover up the fact that the man commonly known as Barack Hussein Obama II has no original birth certificate anywhere in the United States, and that the document placed on the White House website on April 27, 2011, is a forgery.
June 14th, 2011 @ 1:05 pm
Check out reason #9 says that a court order is needed to get the document released. All you need is a court order.
June 14th, 2011 @ 1:49 pm
Orly, you could say that you are Obama’s long-lost love child, so you want a copy of your daddy’s BC.
June 14th, 2011 @ 2:32 pm
Start hitting the online family tree and we can link someone to a recent common ancestor.
But do it quick, before they change the law.
June 14th, 2011 @ 3:05 pm
So the electronic copy is in the public domain but not its source? What makes the difference between the two and if there is a difference then the original is still yet to be made public. Someone should write back and challenge them with the fact that they are now admitting that there is different information on the “original” that they are holding away from the public and the one they supposedly gave to Obama’s attorney personally or else there is no legal reason to keep something secret that is already claimed by the President himself to have been released to the public!!
June 14th, 2011 @ 8:24 pm
Ed:…here’s an article to explain why the Hawaian “pinapples” won’t cooperate:…
https://www.wnd.com/?pageId=310949
In true teen-age fashion, they act like this whole Crisis is a freakin’ game!
June 14th, 2011 @ 9:04 pm
A lawyer I am not, but by the cited Hawaii statute, 338-18(b)(9), all you need is a writ of mandamus (court order) as Jerry said above. There is no valid reason they can give for not giving the original once the “copies” have been released to the American People. You’ve clearly got them, Orly. They’re just trying to delay the inevitable. You’ve got them in your periscope’s crosshairs now. The torpedoes are dammed. Fire when ready!
June 15th, 2011 @ 6:53 am
The meaning of common ancestor for the DOH is grandparent or closer.
June 17th, 2011 @ 5:35 pm
It’s true that DOH is selective about who they consider a common ancestor. The law does not give them the legal right to decide which common ancestors qualify and which do not, but they disregard the law and do what they want. That’s how the HI DOH operates. They are the biggest bunch of crooks I’ve ever seen.
June 18th, 2011 @ 4:26 pm
Since we’re not talking about genealogy here, the HI DOH can define what they mean by ‘common ancestor’ however they choose.