10 Responses to “Another unsuccessful attempt from Obama camp”

1. Elizabeth
   June 9th, 2013 @ 3:46 pm

   This newbie, Eric Walker, has posted the same
   illiterate foolishness on the petition. This time he is in KS… a tornado may have blown him there from Calif.

   At any rate, he would never understand your explanation about his 1st grade reasoning. It is just beyond his comprehension and intellectual skills. I doubt he made it
   through 7th grade. I also doubt it is Obama posting these idiocies, because he may not even write his own speeches. And has a lot of trouble emoting them, as it is.

   This Eric sounds like a kid playing hookey from elementary school. And if it is the same identity as Darren Hankins, we know he has more than one psychiatric issue: Schizophrenia being obvious.

   Eric, you have to realize that there are over 58,000 signatures opposing your uneducated theories. Those people are a whole lot smarter than you are. I suggest you go back to school, study Government when you reach high school level (if you ever do), then get back to the millions of people who are more savvy than you are at this moment in time.

   And by the way, if Doctor Taitz weren’t the figurehead of this investigation, you would not have anyone else to blame.. we millions are also in on this unmasking of your hero.

   So go ahead.. threaten us. I know at least 50 people on this board would love to meet you in person. Coward!

2. Veritas
   June 9th, 2013 @ 5:10 pm

   Eric B Walker is probably Darren Hankins who is probably….who is surely…..

   The fact that they are taking time to write like this shows they are worried, stoned and know they are about to be revealed.

   Time to make popcorn and watch the epic unfold.

3. Equalizer
   June 10th, 2013 @ 3:12 am

   Irrelevant when number was obtained….NOT after the fact, since the MISUSE happened AFTER any respective statute.

   Also, this statute was updated AFTER 2008:

   District of Columbia – 1DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Updated September 1, 2008Current Laws:

   A person commits the offense of identity theft if that person knowingly uses personal identifying information belonging to or pertaining to another person to obtain, or attempt to obtain, property fraudulently and without that person’s consent; or obtains, creates, or possesses personal identifying information belonging to or pertaining to another person with the intent to: Use the information to obtain, or attempt to obtain, property fraudulently and without that person’s consent; or Give, sell, transmit, or transfer the information to a third person to facilitate the use of the information by that third person to obtain, or attempt to obtain, property fraudulently and without that person’s consent.

   “Personal identifying information” includes, but is not limited to, the following: Name, address, telephone number, date of birth, or mother’s maiden name;Driver’s license or driver’s license number, or non-driver’s license or non-driver’s license number; Savings, checking, or other financial account number; Social Security number or tax identification number; Passport or passport number; citizenship status, visa, or alien registration card or number; Birth certificate or a facsimile of a birth certificate; Credit or debit card, credit or debit card number, or credit history or credit rating; Signature; Personal identification number, electronic identification number, password, access code or device, electronic address, electronic identification number, routing information or code, digital signature, or telecommunication identifying information; Biometric data, such as fingerprint, voice print, retina or iris image, or other unique physical representation; Place of employment, employment history, or employee identification number; and Any other numbers or information that can be used to access a person’s financial resources, access medical information, obtain identification, act as identification, or obtain property.

   If the property obtained or the amount of financial injury is $250 or more, it is identity theft in the first degree, punishable by up to ten years in prison and/or a fine up $10,000, three times the value of the property obtained, or three times the amount of the financial injury, whichever is greatest. If the value is less than $250, it is identity theft in the second degree, punishable by up to 180 days in jail and/or a fine up to $1000.

   Any person who commits the offense of identity theft against an individual 65 years of age or older may be punished by a fine of up to 1 ½ times the maximum fine and/or term of
   imprisonment otherwise authorized for the offense.

   It is an affirmative defense that the accused
   reasonably believed that the victim was not 65 years of age or older at the time of the offense or could not have determined the age of the victim because of the manner in which the offense was committed.

   Statute: §22-3277:
   https://occ.dc.gov/occ/lib/occ/web-identity_theft.pdf

   Jurisdiction:
   The offense of identity theft is deemed to be committed in the District of Columbia, regardless of whether the offender is physically present in the District, if the person whose personal identifying information is improperly obtained, created, possessed, or used is a resident of the District, or any part of the offense takes place in the District.

   Statute: §22-3277:
   https://occ.dc.gov/occ/lib/occ/web-identity_theft.pdf

4. Pat1
   June 10th, 2013 @ 5:28 am

   Eric appears to be a, “Twin-Digit-Midget”, of the lowest order.

   Very likely an example of the vast majority of the, “Sheeple”.

   No wonder we are having such a difficult time educating him.

5. republicansoldier
   June 10th, 2013 @ 5:40 am

   The context, spelling, grammar, and sentence forming of this illiterate jackass should be enough to tell you he is one of the uneducated free-loaders who voted for 0bama. “Their for”???? Never have I seen it typed like this. I could not stop laughing at this idiot! LOL. Unreal!

6. Pat1
   June 10th, 2013 @ 12:13 pm

   Eric appears to be a, “Twin-Digit-Midget”, of the lowest order, and a prime example of the vast majority of sheeple in America.

   And we wonder why it is so difficult to educate these sheeple, GO FIGURE!!!!

7. Davey Crockett
   June 10th, 2013 @ 2:31 pm

   Elizabeth: “…he may have been blown to Ks from Calif…!” LOL!

   Yeah, I don’t think, though, that “Door #3” actually knows what planet he’s on, either!!! LOL! 🙂

8. Betty Bushing
   June 10th, 2013 @ 3:21 pm

   LOL, that illiterate little punk (Eric) can’t even spell. Just ignore that little mouse, he loves to hide behind a computer like the little twit he is. His mama put koolaid in his bottle and now he has no teeth along with no brains.

9. KBB
   June 11th, 2013 @ 12:33 am

   The fact that Obamabots came up with this lame theory about “after the fact” is tantamount to admitting that Obama is an ID thief. It shows their desperation. If they didn’t know or think he stole the SSN he’s using, they would have no reason to even come up with this nonsense.

10. Elizabeth
    June 11th, 2013 @ 7:41 am

    That is true, that he admits the validity of the ID theft by giving an excuse for it. Kind of reverse thinking but he is too dumb to realize it. Lots of gibberish comes from these types of foolish people.

Leave a Reply