Amended motion asking judge Lamberth to recuse himself
Posted on | December 1, 2013 | 12 Comments
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
In her capacity as the President of
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
29839 Santa Margarita Parkway, STE 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688
Tel: (949) 683-5411; Fax (949) 766-7603
E-Mail: dr_taitz@yahoo.com, orly.taitz@gmail.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Dr. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ, PRO SE §
Plaintiff, §
§
v. §
§
Patrick Donahoe, Postmaster General, §
David C. Williams, Inspector General §
for the United States Postal Service §
Respondent §
MOTION TO RECUSE UNDER 28 USC 455
Plaintiff herein, Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ respectfully requests honorable Royce Lamberth to recuse himself as a presiding judge in the case at hand and transfer the case to another judge.
28 USC 455 and precedent of Marshall v Jarrico 446 U.S. 238, 242, 100 S. Ct. 161, 642 Ed 2d 182 (1980) will provide for such recusal.
The case at hand deals with the refusal by the Postmaster General and Inspector General for the USPS to provide records under FOIA 5 US 552 Freedom of Information act. The records that are requested relate to a flagrantly forged Selective Service registration of Barack Obama and a flagrantly forged USPS cancellation stamp affixed to it. Fabricated stamp is so laughable that it looks like it was concocted by a mentally challenged five year old or a forger who is legally blind. Sworn affidavit of a former Chief Investigator of the US Coast Guard confirms that the document is altered.
At issue is the fact that this court showed bias in prior relating cases and the plaintiff is fairly sure that this court will show the same bias in the case at hand.
In the prior case of Taitz v Astrue 11-cv-402 plaintiff provided the court with undeniable legal, competent evidence of Obama using a stolen Social Security number of a resident of Connecticut born in 1890.
In spite of the fact that the plaintiff provided the court with all the evidence that Obama and the Social Security Administration defrauded the court and the nation and improperly withheld the SS-5 application which it was obligated to release, this court chose to ignore all the evidence and to cover it all up. By doing so this court showed bias against the plaintiff and against every US citizen for this matter and in favor of Barack Obama who stole the franchise of the US President with stolen and fabricated IDs.
It is clear that this court will continue showing the same bias in the case at hand and will cover up all evidence of Obama defrauding the nation and of the top governmental officials committing treason and being criminally complicit in the cover up and as such the plaintiff respectfully asks this court to recuse itself and transfer the case to another judge.
Moreover, in this case the defense did not furnish an answer or responsive pleadings for four months, while the defense was served by certified mail and admitted receiving the complaint and summons at DOJ by certified mail. The clerk in charge of all of the receipts of complaints received by certified mail has signed and Plaintiff provided his signed receipt and similar receipts for other cases, which were signed by the same clerk, Eddy Hase. In his sworn declaration Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel VanHorn admitted to being contacted by this court in regards to lack of an answer to complaint. Such contact by the court represents an impermissible ex-parte communication by the court with the party and it by itself requires Judge Lamberth to recuse himself from the case and transfer the case to another judge, who did not engage in impermissible ex-parte communications with the defense in order to assist the defense and in order not to issue a default judgment for the plaintiff that this court was obligated to issue.
Further, Plaintiff demanded an administrative hearing with the clerk of the DOJ Eddy Hase in order to ascertain whether someone at DOJ told this clerk to “misplace” or destroy the complaint, which was received in July of 2013. The court ignored all evidence of the complaint disappearing at the DOJ, as well as all the evidence in prior cases. This comes on the heels of James Rosen case, where this court allowed spying on FOX reporter James Rosen and even his parents based on a perjured affidavit and kept this subpoena improperly sealed for over a year. Thus, there is a pattern of this court being biased in favor of Obama and his regime, in spite of any and all crimes committed by Obama and his regime against American citizens, and this court shows bias against dissidents and whistleblowers, who blew the whistle on Obama and his regime.
Further on, such transfer of the case is in the best interest of the public at large and the time is of the essence. U.S. citizens deserve better than a thief, who is usurping the U.S. Presidency with a stolen Social Security number and fabricated IDs. National Security and the interests of the U.S. military require release of the records in question and require an end to the cover up. As such, recusal by this court is justified, essential and in the public interest.
Respectfully,
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
Comments
12 Responses to “Amended motion asking judge Lamberth to recuse himself”
Leave a Reply
December 1st, 2013 @ 10:41 am
Orly, I do not have enough words to express my appreciation and admiration to you for all the hard work and dedication you have contributed in this vital effort. I knew the thief-in-chief and his minions were totally corrupt, but I had no idea just how corrupt to the core the Justice System was until I started following your cases. The treatment you have endured from this system has proven to me no Citizen can not receive fair justice when confronting injustice!!
There is no doubt the request for this judge to recuse himself from this case has more than enough evidence to get off the case, but also be charged with a number of corrupt actions he has taken.
Again Orly, many, many thanks. I will contribute to cause in the near future. Be safe.
December 1st, 2013 @ 10:48 am
thank you andy for your support.
i am totally horrified with what I AM SEEING IN COURTS.
December 1st, 2013 @ 1:30 pm
Recuse himself is an under statement! The judge swore an oath to defend America and its Constitution against all enemies foreign and or domestic and he knows he’s in crystal clear criminal violation of those laws. Impunity? Diplomatic immunity? Above reproach? Above the law? Above all his oath perjury was a felony crime, but his overt acts to defend the indefensible criminal infiltrating communist usurper obama to usher in one world government inadvertently proved judge is complicit, and a cold blooded treasonous collaborator that should be arrested as soon as possible. Judge lamberth has proven himself guilty of the overt acts of high treason.
December 1st, 2013 @ 2:41 pm
Love it!
Don’t let the bastards grind you down!
(‘Non illigitamus carborundum’ or perhaps ‘Noli spurios te contundere’ 🙂
Give ’em hell, Orly.
December 1st, 2013 @ 8:37 pm
And I too am totally horrified with what I AM SEEING IN COURTS and in the ENTIRE NATION! I cannot fathom how so many people could have fallen so low without any brutal coercion…
December 2nd, 2013 @ 6:14 am
Mrs. Taitz: Isn’t this case over? The judge found in favor of the defendants’ motion and sealed it? How can asking that the judge be recused at this point change anything?
December 2nd, 2013 @ 7:16 am
I am asking him to recuse himself in the case against the Postmaster General
December 2nd, 2013 @ 11:54 am
This is how serious this Crisis really is!
These trash-SOB’s think they can ware us down! God, are they ignorant!
I mean: some of these people are very aged, so why is God allowing them to continue to play this psychotic game? That alone really ticks me off! They don’t scare me; they make me more determined to SOLVE THIS MY/OUR/THE RIGHT WAY!!
December 2nd, 2013 @ 1:07 pm
Dr. Taitz
I can tell you from my own personal experience that the DOJ does not have a problem with fictionalizing “evidence”, because they know that they can get a pass from the admin. I believe that this admin uses the tactics of intimidation and legal recourse against people who challenge its policies. For example, the IRS was used to silence Conservatives. It wasn’t until this became publicized that they had to retract. And i believe there are hidden tactics as well. Unless our Represenatives or the press work to support the American people, this nonsense will continue. We need another Emile Zola! Where is he or she?
December 2nd, 2013 @ 7:55 pm
Yes, I told you so. Judge Lamberth is a
traitor and national disgrace. All he does
is stonewall, evade, distort, misstate the
truth. Send him to Gitmo. IMO.
December 3rd, 2013 @ 11:18 am
I believe all the judges in all of orly’s cases need to recuse themselves.
This lamberth who supposedly had to go to a funeral….has delayed ruling on a default..
Lets add up the time shall we..
Jul 31
Aug 31
Sep 30
Oct 31
Nov 31
Dec 3
Grand Total of 157 days to NOT RULE ON A DEFAULT BY BARRY SOETORAH…
REMEMBER CONGRESSMEN, YOU WILL BE THE FIRST ONES TO BE ROUNDED UP BY HOMELAND, CIA, FBI..SINCE YOU KEPT YOUR MOUTHS SHUT.
ISSA’S been stonewalled by the FBI for months and about to subpeona.
When the Chief Counsel for the IRS says 81 times I DONT RECALL…HOUSTON WE DONT HAVE A PROBLEM. THE COMET HAS HIT THE EARTH.
DISGUSTED WITH THE LYING FILTHY EVIL IN THE WHITEHOUSE AND GOVT…
OBADIAH CHAPTER ONE…
December 3rd, 2013 @ 6:35 pm
Send both Judge Lamberth and Judge Shapiro to
GITMO. Let the terrorists torture them. Make
them pay, and torture them with the Koran, and
a daily flogging. No justice, no mercy. IMO.