Yes, they used several convicted criminals to write to the judge, to provide perjured testimony, to try to ruin my reputation
Posted on | November 27, 2009 | 2 Comments
Dawn |
Submitted on 2009/11/27 at 3:17pm
Yephora–She must be careful?—as though her reputation is what is MOST important. If anyone KNOWS about throwing aside reputation, and focusing on what is right, it’s Orly Taitz. I’m surprised you would make such a comment on this blog, about SP and think it would fly here. Do you think SP didn’t know about the ineligibility of BO when she was running for VP. McCain’s eligiblity was questioned during the campaign, so I’m sure BO’s status was clear to his opponents, because these politicans aren’t stupid. They know what’s going on. Just because a citizen questions what a politician does, does not mean they are being treated harshly. When you shine the light on corruption, those who are innocent, don’t need to scatter. They need to stand firm and let the truth be known, for the sake of democracy and freedom. |
Call Sarah Palin and ask her to join my plaintiffs 5 # |
Comments
2 Responses to “Yes, they used several convicted criminals to write to the judge, to provide perjured testimony, to try to ruin my reputation”
November 27th, 2009 @ 6:45 pm
Sarah Sunshine is appearing all over the country on a book tour. She is accessible right now. So Dawn, why aren’t you getting in line to put the eligibility question to her? You could print out some of the excellent evidences that have appeared on Orly’s blog, and lay it on table before her. Bring along a videocamera to record her response to your questions about why she isn’t saying this, or doing that because we’d all love to see it. To repeat what I said earlier I hope someone soon puts the eligibility question to her.
November 27th, 2009 @ 9:48 pm
Yephora–you stated:
“To step into the eligibility issue at this point, as valid as it is, would be political suicide for her.” and
“She would be no good to anyone.”
“…I fervently hope she will at least put her toe in the eligibility issue before too long by obliquely saying something – just to bring it wider attention!”
You have explained that SP will hurt her political livelihood by addressing the ineligibility of BO. You also stated she should put her toe into the issue before too long, even though you also believe she would be no good to anyone. It does “seem” like two contradictory statements, in my opinion.
As far as my approaching Sarah “Sunshine”–
I don’t need to interview her to know that she’s another puppet.
I’m expecting independent thinkers to “consider” politicians are actors on a “stage”, because I have studied the issue.
(There’s so much evidence out there for the taking.)
Some people choose to keep their eyes on the “stage” of actors and don’t want to know about what’s going on behind the “curtain”. If that fits you, it’s certainly your right. I don’t know you, so I’m not going to assume what you believe.
I just wanted to give others something to think about, because that’s my right. It’s not my intention to offend anyone by sharing my thoughts and questions. You seem like a nice enough person, so I’m confident you’re not taking offense.