OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi


The content of Obama’s long form birth certificate is unknown to all 3 branches of government

Posted on | October 28, 2009 | Comments Off on The content of Obama’s long form birth certificate is unknown to all 3 branches of government

Eric, NY

The defense argument is that this issue is a political argument and thus the court can not hear the case. Mr West then concedes “I believe that the courts could have some jurisdiction over the question of whether a candidate is qualified to be on the ballot”. It was gracious of him to allow “some jurisdiction” and then go on to argue who should decide that jurisdiction as if another branch of government had the power to limit the amont of jurisdiction the court should actually have.

Never has any constitutional rule, observable by the court, been removed of the courts view thus preventing review of its application. This question is within observing what has or has not been done, as in whether there is conclusive evidence that what has not been yet done would likely require doing to be constitutionally legal. The content of Obamas original long form birth certificate document is as yet unknown to any of the three branches of government where it ought to be discoverable under FOIA and is actually the object of the defense to not have it discovered, that proves the article two section one requirement has not been fulfilled.

The FOIA argument of the defense is dishonest. Their client has asserted executive power blocking any FOIA discovery. To state that any amount of refiling might somehow be productive one might as well also state “if they find a legal loophole before we close it”.

How can a requirement be met without presenting anything legally recognizable as proof ?

How can that unseen proof be determined to be only reviewable by some other entity when it can not even be disclosed what the content is that would satisfy the rules for that determination to even be made?

The document itself must present itself for the satisfaction of the rule before any question of the rules application on that document can be made.\

Comments

Comments are closed.