Dates for trial
Posted on | October 24, 2009 | 4 Comments
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
CV-90 (12/02)
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL Page 1 of 1
Case No. SACV09-0082 DOC (ANx) Date October 5, 2009
Title CAPTAIN PAMELA BARNETT, ET AL. V. BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, ET AL.
Present: The
Honorable
David O. Carter, U.S. District Judge
Kristee Hopkins Debbie Gale N/A
Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No.
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:
Orly Taitz
Gary Kreep
David DeJute, AUSA
Roger West, AUSA
Proceedings: 1. MOTION BY DEFENDANTS TO DISMISS CASE
2. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
Cause called and counsel state their appearances. Argument by counsel. Motion taken
under submission.
On September 8, 2009, the Court previously set tentative case management dates. The
Court now orders those dates be made final.
Case Management dates are as follows:
Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing December 7, 2009, at 8:30 a.m.
File Motion for Summary Judgment November 16, 2009
Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment November 26, 2009
Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment November 30, 2009
Final Pretrial Conference January 11, 2010, at 8:30 a.m.
Jury Trial January 26, 2010, at 8:30 a.m.
3 : 21
01
Initials of Preparer kh
Case 8:09-cv-00082-DOC-AN Document 81 Filed 10/05/2009 Page 1 of 1
Dr. Orly Taitz Esq
29839 S. Margarita Pkwy
Rancho Santa Margarita Ca 92688
ph.-949-683-5411
fax 949-766-7603
Comments
4 Responses to “Dates for trial”
October 24th, 2009 @ 5:43 pm
Based the October 5, 2009 transcript it looks looks Carter might actually move your case forward even though he hasn’t reached a decision yet:
“Court now orders those dates be made final.”
From Transcript:
“Concerning the dates, I’m going to delay that, because you both agreed to the dates, and therefore, in the order, if we’re going forward, the dates will be set out as agreed upon. There’s nothing to decide today in terms of scheduling conference. If we’re not going forward, then the dates are meaningless.”
October 24th, 2009 @ 6:08 pm
Is this NEW news or just the same info from the Oct 5th hearing?
October 24th, 2009 @ 6:17 pm
Could Judge Carter grant discovery at any time, or are we waiting until Jan 26th to find out if he will or not?
Seems like the nature of the case would be a reason to expedite things, eligibility of POTUS/CiC especially, but this should be settled before he signs HC deform, and that climate change/one world government treaty in December.
October 24th, 2009 @ 10:15 pm
You know Judge Carter may be using the Discovery issue as a tool to keep Obama in CHECK until the trial. So the health care thing gets passed and he signs us away in December to the U.N. I could see Judge Carter pull the rug out from under those two decisions with a little decision of his own called “Discovery.” Could this be why he has not made a decision. Couldn’t you imagine the public outrage if those two things get passed and then we find out that he can’t be President. Oh I think this mat be exactly what’s going on in my little humble opinion.