Should the Citizen Grand Jurys investigate the Judges?
Posted on | October 21, 2009 | 3 Comments
Monday, September 14, 2009
by Janet Phelan as published in the *Bernandino County Sentinel
Several years ago, all of the county’s probate and conservatorship cases were moved to Redlands Courthouse and most of these cases were subsequently heard by Judge Welch.
Recent documents obtained by the Sentinel point to suspicious financial activity by Welch, who at one point in time was the presiding judge of San Bernardino County. Welch was featured in an article in the Sentinel on June 12th of this year in a lengthy exposé regarding questionable business practices by Melodie Z. Scott, a professional fiduciary and conservator for the elderly. Scott is President of C.A.R.E., Inc., located at 25 E. State Street in Redlands, right around the corner from the courthouse.
The activities by Scott cited by the Sentinel as questionable involved giving conservatee property to her own family members, overcharges on her clients’ accounts, missing monies from clients’ accounts, selling conservatee property at bargain basement rates only to have the property jump in value and sell the next year, withholding medical care from conservatees resulting in death and allegations of possible undue influence on judges.
The documents uncovered relating to Judge Welch reveal that he has mortgaged his primary residence, located in the 300 block of La Colina in Redlands several times in recent years, encumbering it with loans which could not possibly be paid back on a judge’s salary in the brief turn-around time indicated by the reconveyances (repayment of loans). The document numbers and the size of the loans follow:
In 1998, Welch and his wife, Ginny, took out a loan for $217,200 on their La Colina residence, which was fully paid back in March of 2003. The reconveyance document number attached to this transaction is 2003-0173087.
In February of 2003, James and Ginny Welch took out another loan on their residence, this time for $234,000. This was fully paid back by June 10, 2004, as listed in document number 2004-0410928.
Another loan was taken out by the Welches on May 17, 2004, as listed in document #2004-0353533. This loan was for $358,965.71.
Messages were left with Welch’s secretary, inquiring as to where the money was going and how he was paying these loans back. The possibility that Welch was taking out loans and investing the money, then paying back the loans with the proceeds was considered and discarded. For the last seven years, Welch has reported to the Fair Political Practices Commission on his form 700 financial disclosure statements that he has no investments.
A query was also left with Judge Welch’s secretary as to three property transactions recorded in neighboring Riverside County, attributed to a “James Michael Welch, Trustee.”
Judge Welch has declined to comment. Presiding judge Jim McGuire issued a terse letter on August 12th, 2009, in response to an inquiry from the Sentinel about the Welch loans and Riverside County transactions. McGuire stated:“Please be advised that I have received and reviewed your letter of August 11, 2009. Please be further advised that I am an administrative presiding judge and, therefore, my review jurisdiction is limited. Nothing contained in your letter is of a nature over which I would have review jurisdiction. Any request for review or investigation by me is, therefore, denied.”
There has been no confirmation or denial from the court as to whether Welch’s exodus from his probate assignment in Redlands had any bearing on the recent media scrutiny given his actions as a judge or his apparent bias towards cases involving Melodie Scott, who recently launched a legal protest concerning the denial of her fiduciary license by the California Professional Fiduciary Bureau.
This practice of judges taking out large loans appears to be widespread and crosses county boundaries. Information gathered on Commissioner John McCoy and Judge Sharon Waters (both of Riverside County) has recently been turned over to a Riverside County district attorney investigator, Jeff Chebahtah. While Chebahtah has acknowledged receipt of the information on the Waters and McCoy loans, he has at press time refused to assign a complaint/case file number. The practice of accepting evidence and refusing to assign a tracking number has been previously explored by this reporter in an article entitled: “How the California Justice System covers up crimes against the elderly: A method to themadness” and appears to be deployed when either the matter is too trivial for the district attorney to take seriously or when there is a political agenda to keep the report out of the system and thus not to investigate at all.
Parenthetically, both McCoy and Waters were recently and consecutively removed from an active case in Riverside Superior Court, following a protest lodged that the loans smacked of pay-offs or bribes.
In San Bernardino County, Judge Steve Mapes ascended to the bench in 2007 and currently sits on Barstow court, following his tenure as an deputy district attorney in San Bernardino. Mapes has also been involved in the loan program, apparently going back to 1998, when he took out a loan on his home on Patricia Drive for over $155, 000. He subsequently took out further loans on his property, including loans for $100,000 in 2001 and 2002, another loan for $307,500, also in 2001, one for $88,500 in 2002 and a loan in 2004 which was in excess of the value of the house, recorded at the tax assessor’s office as $427,528. This loan was taken out for a resounding $493,000.
More recently, in 2006, he again borrowed money against his property. Since 2001, Judge Steven Mapes has received seven different reconveyances on his loans.
*Page 1 of this week’s Sentinel features a story on several members of the California judiciary who are taking out numerous large property loans and paying them back in record time. There are unanswered questions as to the reason for these loans: where is the money going and –most importantly– who is paying these loans off? This is the first in a series of articles examining the finances of the California judiciary and other public officials.
Related Stories by Janet Phelan : How Conservatorships/Guardianships Are Used as Tools of Theft and Corruption
at 9/14/2009 12:05:00 AM
Comments
3 Responses to “Should the Citizen Grand Jurys investigate the Judges?”
October 21st, 2009 @ 5:03 pm
BY ALL MEANS ASAP
October 21st, 2009 @ 11:46 pm
CITIZEN GRAND JURIES SHOULD GATHER AND READ THE INFO PRESENTED BY MICHAEL TSARION THERE THEY WILL FIND THE DECEIPT PERPETRATED BY ALL IN THIS SUPPOSED FREE COUNTRY THATS ONLY FREE AS LONG AS WE STAY IN LINE…HIS SITE WILL SHOCK YOU ALL AWAKE…THERE YOU WILL FIND TRUTH THAT IS NOT EASY TO TAKE…BUT IMPERATIVE..WE’VE BEEN ENSLAVED AND BRAINWASHED IF WE HAD A REAL CONSTITUTION BY THE PEOPLE AND FOR THE PEOPLE THERE WOULD BE NO ROOM FOR THE DECEPTION WE ARE WITNESSING AND WHICH HAS BEEN PLANNED..FOR HUNDREDS OF YEARS..
October 24th, 2009 @ 3:14 am
I THINK WE NEED TO ESTABLISH CITIZEN JUDGES WHO CAN SET UP CITIZEN JAILS TO INCARCERATE THE OBAMAFIA’S JUDICIAL COMMIE NAZIS!!! THEN, WHEN WE HAVE ALL OF THE OBAMAWERMACHT IN THEIR PROPER PLACES (JAIL), WE CAN FINALLY GET OUR COUNTRY BACK TO WHAT IT WAS BEFORE 2009!
GOD BLESS YOU ORLY TAITZ, IF JESUS WAS ALIVE, HE’D HIRE YOU TO DEFEND HIM AGAINST PONTIUS PILATE AND THE PHARISEES!