6 Responses to “Sessions’s recusal was a terrible move. Now Trump needs to either reassign Boente and replace him wih someone he can trust or he will need a new AG. AG needs to be the Rock of Gibraltar and Sessions did not show himself to be the one”

1. Constitutional Patriot Supports President Trump...
   March 3rd, 2017 @ 12:10 pm

   Can Sessions change his mind and do the job?

   Or can President Trump name Rudy to stop these treasonous games?

2. Constitutional Patriot Supports President Trump...
   March 3rd, 2017 @ 12:13 pm

   McCarthy was right!

   And Orly is right…Jeff should have gone and done his job, no matter what the left thinks!

   Come on, Sessions, get tough as nails! Don’t let these people push you around!

3. Constitutional Patriot Supports President Trump...
   March 3rd, 2017 @ 12:42 pm

   Why would an O prosecutor be the one chosen?

   Why wouldn’t President Trump be the one to select an impartial person?

   How about Rudy? He could be trusted?

4. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
   March 3rd, 2017 @ 12:42 pm

   yes and yes

5. Sticks
   March 3rd, 2017 @ 2:00 pm

   Very discouraging move.

6. Alexander Shapiro
   March 3rd, 2017 @ 8:29 pm

   President Trump saw an article headlined on Drudge Report: “Schumer and the Russians ”. It was published in Gateway Pundit. Drudge report. Trump Twitted: “We should start an immediate investigation into Chuck Schumer and his ties to Russia and Putin. A total hypocrite!” .

   Chuck Schumer replied by the twit: “Happily talk re: my contact w Mr. Putin & his associates, took place in ’03 in full view of press & public under oath. Would you &your team?”
   1:24 PM – 3 Mar 2017

   Schumer talks about his contact w Putin and associates in New York City taken place fourteen years ago. Schumer asserts the contact was in full view of the press. And it was in full view of the public. The press took the photo of Schumer and Putin. This documents to some extent the presence of the Press. Where is the evidence for the presence of the public, unless Schumer and Putin is the public. But the participants of that meeting are certainly not the public. Is Schumer lying to us about the public? The press might be the public. But if Schumer’s friend took the photo, there was no press and there was no public.

   How much Schumer is lying to us about the supposedly well documented meeting? Schumer would say “not at all”, because I am giving this testimony under Oath.

   Since Schumer has mentioned the term “Oath” in his twit, I am wondering what the whole Schumer’s twit means. Has Schumer given an oath at some point that what he told about the meeting with Putin@ associates is true? Which people has witnessed Schumer’s oat? What sacred text has Schumer used to give the oat? When has Schumer given his Oath?

   I am skeptical that Schumer has given any oath about the meeting with the Putin. Why? If Schumer has given the oath already, Schumer has to provide the info about the oath, I have asked for above.. But Schumer’s twit does not include such info. Therefore, Schumer’s reference to the oath is a promise that announces he would give the oath if he is asked for it. So suppose Schumer is asked for the oath. The meeting in the presence of a Rabbi is arranged and Schumer gives the oath on Tora.

   What would prevent Schumer to tell a complete lie? Has he not lied previously? Schumer is a New York Senator in the US senate. He has surely lied many times to his people and to the Congress during his decades in the Senate.

   The conclusion of this is that the mention of oath in Schumer’s twit does not give any credit to Schumer’s testimony regarding his meeting with Putin. We do not know what has transpired between Schumer and Putin.

   It follows that Schumer rhetorical question about Trump people meeting with Russians providing similar quality evidence that Schumer provides in his twit about Schumer’s meeting with Putin @ associates: “Would you &your team?” is meaningless. It is purely rhetorical device as Schumer only has provided the photo. We know nothing about the exchange of info between Schumer and Putin sides.

   Unless there is a protocol that determines the behaviors of American Government official with respect to a foreigner such as Putin and his team, and this protocol has been broken there is nothing to report. And Schumer reports nothing about the meeting.

   This raises the question again why has Jeff Sessions resigned as AG? What protocol has Jeff Sessions broken? What are the legal consequences?

   Additionally, Schumer referring to a meeting with Putin @ associates that has occurred 14 years ago, implicitly implies that he had no later meetings with Russians for the past 14 years.

   Is that the truth? President Trump is absolutely correct to demand an investigation into Schumer’/s relationship with the Russians.

   This also calls for such an investigation between Obama and Russians.

   Since Obama is mentioned this immediately necessitates the investigation into Mr. Obama usurpation of the US Presidency for the past 8 years, announcement of Obama illegality as a Federal Employee in the WH for 8 years and imprisonment for about 3 years for the impersonation of a Federal Employee according to the Federal Code. No impeachment is involved.

   Just the verification that of the lack of documents to confirm Obama’s father lack of US citizenship at the time of Obama’s birth. His mother may have not had her US citizenship at the time of birth too. This would be a fitting development against the anti-Trump hysteria fired by the Democrats.

Leave a Reply