Anger mounts, public demands that House of Representatives impeach Judge Robart and other judges who violate their oath of office to defend and protect the constitution
Posted on | February 8, 2017 | 5 Comments
All over the Internet and in calls to TV and radio shows the public is expressing anger with corruption and lawlessness in the US judiciary, particularly federal judiciary.
Each judge takes an oath of office to defend and protect the constitution.
We are seeing time an again judges committing a crime of violation of oath of office. State judges can be thrown out of office by voters. Federal judges have life time appointments. The only way to throw them from the bench, is by an impeachment by the House of Representatives and subsequent removal by the senate. Even if the senate ultimately does not remove the judge from the bench, just the history of impeachment (similar to indictment) by the House of Representatives is a blemish on his name.
Under Title 8, particularly 8USC 1182 the president of the United States has a right to ban any group of aliens from the US. The public is outraged that Judge Robart completely disregarded the constitution and the law and stayed the executive order by the president.
Moreover, the states have no standing to bring this challenge in the first place. Some compare this case with Texas v US, which challenged Obama’s grant of legal status to illegal aliens. The cases are vastly different. While the president can ban certain groups of aliens from entering the US, he does not have legal authority to grant them legal status. Only Congress can do that. Additionally, Texas have shown that, if legal status is given, the state of Texas would have to subsidize drivers licenses to them which would amount to millions of dollars, clear damage to the state. Here the states did not show any damage.
The states did not show that any residents of their states are even affected by the ban. Moreover, even if they are affected, those residents would have to bring their own action and seek an administrative review and waiver. If they are separated from their relatives, the state is not affected. If they miss 3 months from college, the state is not affected. The only area where the state is remotely affected, is when they do not work for 3 months and the state would lose the state tax for those 3 months. However, the damage is minuscule and, most importantly, the state of WA and MN did not show why those employers cannot hire American citizen workers to fill those work places. We have 95 million adult Americans, who are not in labor force. The states did not show why employees cannot replace a couple of Somalies or Sudanese, whose visas are temporarily denied, particularly, when the national security and people’s lives are at stake. What happens if one of those people commits a terrorist act? What will the judges do? Will they just say sorry?
We will see what the liberal 9th Circuit decides. However, there is not much hope there. Yesterday former mayor of San Diego and syndicated talk show host, Roger Hedgecock stated: the 9th circuit believes that the constitution is fake and Obama’s birth certificate is real.
It says it all. Will the House of Representatives file articles of impeachment against Judge Robart for violation of his oath of office to protect and defend the constitution?
Comments
5 Responses to “Anger mounts, public demands that House of Representatives impeach Judge Robart and other judges who violate their oath of office to defend and protect the constitution”
Leave a Reply












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

February 8th, 2017 @ 3:35 pm
https://coed.com/2017/02/06/shelia-fedrick-alaska-airlines-flight-attendant-human-trafficking-teenager-victim-rescued-saved-info-details-updates/
February 8th, 2017 @ 5:37 pm
The homosexual (homosodomy) marriage case is one of the worst examples of an unelected supreme court taking democratic power from the people of America.
Read Scalia’s dissent on page 69 of the decision.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-556_3204.pdf
They just make it up out of thin air and distort the meaning of words until they reach their agenda.
Marriage is religion and belongs to God, not the state.
In the words of an eye witness and it’s Creator, Jesus said,
Mar 10:6 But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female.
Mar 10:7 For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and cleave to his wife;
Mar 10:8 And they twain shall be one flesh: so then they are no more twain, but one flesh.
Mar 10:9 What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.”
Five of the supreme court justices should be impeached for passing Obamacare alone which was a tax bill started in the Senate and a tax that exempted Muslims (both are unconstitutional). Those five partisan hacks won’t be missed.
February 8th, 2017 @ 6:01 pm
If there are grounds for impeachment, which I think there are then they better get after it and impeach him. The liberal establishment has a plan to use the liberal courts with every move President Trump makes. If he does not nip this in the bud they will tie his agenda up in knots. Impeach Robart and make an example of him and a few others and they will think twice before legislating from the bench.
February 9th, 2017 @ 11:24 am
Dear Orly,
Winds of Change in the House of Reps:
https://209.157.64.200/focus/f-bloggers/3523053/posts
House Passes Repeal of BLM Planning 2.0 Rule
Excerpt:
“Today, the House passed H.J. Res. 44 (Rep. Liz Cheney, WY-at large), a joint resolution of disapproval under the Congressional Review Act to overturn the BLM Planning 2.0 Rule. Chairman Rob Bishop (R-UT) gave the following remarks during floor debate:”
Excerpt:
“Planning 2.0 dilutes local and state voices and centralizes power here in Washington DC. […] This puts special interest groups above local elected officials, which is not the way it was ever intended,” Chairman Bishop said. “Counties all across the West expect their BLM officials to be responsive to their needs and manage their land with the best interest of the community in mind. Their livelihoods depend on it.”
——-
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-joint-resolution/44/all-actions?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22H.J.+Res.+44%22%5D%7D&r=1&overview=closed#tabs
Date Chamber All Actions
02/08/2017 Senate Received in the Senate.
02/07/2017-4:57pm House Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
02/07/2017-4:57pm House On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 234 – 186 (Roll no. 83). (text: CR H1032)
See how your Representative voted:
https://clerk.house.gov/evs/2017/roll083.xml
——–
Paula Hoehn
February 9th, 2017 @ 2:53 pm
If they impeach Robart then they will have to go back and impeach every one of the ObamaForgeryGate judges also. You now can bring in Arpaio, Zullo, Reed Hayes, 4 Labs from Italy, etc.