8 Responses to “Trump should propose a ban on assault weapons for people who are on a terrorist watch list”

1. Analyst
   June 15th, 2016 @ 2:37 pm

   Exactly!

   And someone who is on a “no-fly” list, as well.

2. Analyst
   June 15th, 2016 @ 2:38 pm

   Also: HAPPY BIRTHDAY, Trumper!

3. Harold Brown
   June 15th, 2016 @ 4:18 pm

   And no Muslim should be allowed to have guns.

4. Virginia W.
   June 15th, 2016 @ 4:53 pm

   There is lots of confusion out there on our weapons. Automatic rifles are already banned. Please see excellent explanation of what an AR-15 really is (credit given to original FB poster, excuse the rough language).
   “Rob Duran
   June 13 at 1:33pm ·
   Ok. I’m going to have to fix a few people on here because emotions are high and stupid shit is being supported.
   First off, most of you have no clue what an assault rifle is! It’s not your fault you don’t know, I will educate you. An assault rifle is a rifle with the ability to go fully automatic. That means if you hold the trigger down, it keeps going bang until you release the trigger or the weapon runs out of ammo. The first assault rifle came about during WWII with the German Stg44. It had the power of a rifle with nearly the rate of fire of a sub-machine gun (full auto). Inspired out of this WWII era gun came the most well knows assault rifles of all time, the AK-47 and the M-16. Both had the ability for fully automatic fire. When people say they want a ban on assault weapons they think they are banning fully automatic rifles from civilian hands. The problem is that these weapons are ALREADY BANNED! See National Firearms Act of 1934, Gun Control Act of 1968, and Firearm Ownership Protection Act of 1986. Civilians cannot obtain these weapons. They are for military and police use almost exclusively.
   So what is this AR-15 if not an assault rifle? It is a standard rifle that LOOKS LIKE a fully automatic M-16, but does not function like one. It does the same thing as any other standard rifle. One trigger pull = one bang. Most of you are not stupid enough to want to ban a Ruger Mini-14 ranch rifle (pictured on top), but cry that the AR-15 (pictured on bottom) is a deadly assault rifle when they are literally capable of the same thing. Same ammo, same capacity, same function. The aesthetic differences between the two are what some want to ban and have banned in the past, which if you look at them, are pants-on-head-retarded to consider deadly features. Some of the things that made a standard functioning rifle considered an assault weapon are:
   A folding or telescoping stock – (does not make the weapon any deadlier).
   A pistol grip – (does not make the weapon any deadlier).
   A bayonet mount – (does not make the weapon any deadlier).
   A flash suppressor – (does not make the weapon any deadlier).
   You see what I’m getting at? The weapons you actually want banned are ALREADY BANNED. The weapons used in these attacks are regular functioning rifles designed to look like their full auto, military counterparts.
   So if the AR-15 isn’t more dangerous than any other standard rifle, then why is is the one being used in all of these shootings? Simple. It just happens to be the most popular rifle in the country. It’s the iPhone of rifles. It is an affordable, accurate rifle that is easy to personalize because everyone makes accessories for it. It isn’t any easier to acquire than other rifles, just more available.
   To wrap this up, If you support banning fully automatic assault rifles, fine. You support a law that is already in place for good reason. I agree we generally don’t need machine guns. However, if you think we should ban standard functioning rifles because of things like how you hold the grip or how adjustable the buttstock is, you are an idiot!
   Consider yourselves educated on this matter.”

5. hapnHal
   June 15th, 2016 @ 7:02 pm

   Muslims claim that Islam is a religion of peace.
   Then, this shouldn’t be offensive to them.

   Pass a law banning “ALL” Muslims from “OWNING” or “PURCHASING GUNS.”

   Make it a FELONY if anyone purchases a gun for Muslim.

   Also, if a Muslim makes inflammatory remarks, report him and if necessary, deport him.

6. taino21
   June 16th, 2016 @ 4:07 am

   Better be careful with that one. Remember that obola has allowed a great number of muslim organizations to be off that terror list while placing law abiding veterans and citizens on that list.

7. EyeballNews
   June 16th, 2016 @ 10:51 am

   Terrorist watch list = YES

   No fly list = NO

   The no fly list is a bunch of crap. There are 4 year old children on that list. People can be added without any real proof.

8. Yuri gurevich
   June 16th, 2016 @ 8:07 pm

   HapnHal:
   [Muslims claim that Islam is a religion of peace.
   Then, this shouldn’t be offensive to them.]

   Islam claims that it is religion of peace, because when Mohammed began to offer Islam in Arabia, he was using only talk, There was peace at that time. Then Mohammed has left that area and went to another one in Arabia a 100 miles away. He changed his methods to force and killing and got huge following. Than he returned back to the first area and destroyed several Jewish tribes there, But not only Jews. That was Jihad.
   So, Muslims can claim that Islam is a religion of piece to confuse non-believes. Muslims must also follow Mohammed ways. They must to do Jihad force conversion of others to Islam. Islam means SUBMIT.
   Islam is Peaceful and Islam is killer are both true sentences in Islam. They both can be used to scare and deceive the nonbelievers. This is what Obama is doing as well as his advisers.

Leave a Reply