Chief Justice Roberts Denies D.C. Madam Attorney’s Motion to Remove Restraining Order on Damning Records Relating to Presidential Race

Sibley vows to continue fight for release of D.C. Madam’s phone records

WASHINGTON D.C. (INTELLIHUB) — Montgomery Blair Sibley, the former lawyer of the D.C. Madam, Deborah Jeane Palfrey, has been under a “gag order” since 2007, restricting him from releasing phone records, a reverse engineered clients list, of the now deceasedD.C. Madam and filed a motion to modify a Restraining Order which was denied by Chief Justice Roberts on April 4.

Sibley told Infowars’ David Knight on the Nightly News that he will “exhaust all judicial remedies” before resorting to leaking the documents.

Sibley said that he “identified about thirteen percent of the actors involved in the D.C. Madam’s escort service over a thirteen year period” and went on to point out that there are about “five times more people that we need to know about” still on that list.

The information that “I am talking about now is stuff that no one has ever seen before,” Sibley said.

Sibley also said it is “improbable” that the D.C. Madam committed suicide, but says he has no way to be sure.

Additionally, Sibley maintains that he has the records on a ‘dead man’s switch,’ which will dump the provocative data to many news agencies, reporters and others if Sibley happensto turn up missing for more than 72 hours.

It has been speculated by many that GOP Candidate Ted Cruz’s presidential run may be hampered by the release of the records.

9 Responses to “Chief Justice Roberts Denies D.C. Madam Attorney’s Motion to Remove Restraining Order on Damning Records Relating to Presidential Race. I don’t know if Mr. Sibley will violate the gag order and will speak up anyways, I hope he speaks up.”

1. Danny Stewart
   April 11th, 2016 @ 9:50 am

   Roberts strikes again. This dude should be kicked out of the scotus.

2. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
   April 11th, 2016 @ 9:57 am

   it’s a life time appointment,he cannot be kicked out. He can be impeached and removed by Congress, however, I don’t think they will do it

3. Andrew morris
   April 11th, 2016 @ 11:38 am

   You won’t say that if Trump is on the list.

4. e. scott
   April 11th, 2016 @ 12:20 pm

   Makes one wonder if he’s listed?

5. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
   April 11th, 2016 @ 12:39 pm

   so far we don’t know who is on the list. It might be Kasich or Sanders as well

6. e. scott
   April 11th, 2016 @ 4:01 pm

   Somehow, Orly, I don’t think Roberts would care who else is on the list. He’d only worry about himself.

7. KBB
   April 12th, 2016 @ 12:56 am

   Orly, could Sibley release the list if he changes it. For instance, Roberts said Sibley cannot release the list he was presented. If Sibley leaves off all the SSNs, addresses, etc, and releases a different list that just has the names, could he get away with that, legally speaking?

8. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
   April 12th, 2016 @ 8:29 am

   they refused to allow him to release it in any form, they didn’t even want to accept the motion for review. I hope, he at least, states which presidential candidates is on the list

9. KBB
   April 17th, 2016 @ 10:20 am

   Thank you, Orly, for clarifying that issue for me.

Leave a Reply