IMPORTANT: PEOPLE ARE SPREADING WRONG INFORMATION ABOUT A CASE BEFORE JUDGE HOLLANDER. I HAD A CASE BEFORE HER YEARS AGO AND SHE DISMISSED IT. THERE IS NO CASE BEFORE JUDGE HOLLANDER AND SHE DID NOT ISSUE ANY SUBPOENAS
Posted on | February 28, 2016 | 7 Comments
Category: Uncategorized
Comments
7 Responses to “IMPORTANT: PEOPLE ARE SPREADING WRONG INFORMATION ABOUT A CASE BEFORE JUDGE HOLLANDER. I HAD A CASE BEFORE HER YEARS AGO AND SHE DISMISSED IT. THERE IS NO CASE BEFORE JUDGE HOLLANDER AND SHE DID NOT ISSUE ANY SUBPOENAS”
Leave a Reply












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

February 28th, 2016 @ 12:20 pm
Dr. Taitz – I just re-posted your comment on my Facebook Timeline!!
February 28th, 2016 @ 12:56 pm
https://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/1973047-youre-on-file-exclusive-inside-story-on-chinas-database-of-americans/
“THEEPOCHTIMES.COM” IS A NEWSPAPER PUBLISHED BY THE FREE CHINESE.
February 28th, 2016 @ 3:29 pm
10-4, I back checked two sites and yes they are not true.
February 29th, 2016 @ 6:05 am
https://www.whois.com/whois/yournation.org
https://www.whois.com/whois/usherald.com
https://usherald.com/breaking-judge-initiates-investigation-obamas-fraudulent-social-security-number/
https://msa.maryland.gov/msa/mdmanual/39fed/02usd/html/msa11683.html
ORLY,
A guy supposedly named Bob Amoroso of US Herald rekindled this story on 2-25-2016.
ANATOMY OF A DISINFORMATION PLOT HEREIN?
Why did Judge Hollander reject your compelling evidence?
February 29th, 2016 @ 7:36 am
she said that it i enough for her that there are no records for Bounel in electronic database, the government does not have to provide the actual paper application for that CT SSN
February 29th, 2016 @ 9:56 am
ICYM Dr. Taitz: “2 confirmed cases of mumps, 6 more suspected in Charlotte” areahttps://www.fox46charlotte.com/news/local-news/93219868-story
March 1st, 2016 @ 6:47 am
in all the court cases and all the disinformation crap.there was 1 actual resolution to all these so called birther name calling obots,, they all say that there is no definition of natural born citizen,, when it was even defined yet again in april 2008 and signed by then senator barry soetoro,,, in the matter of john mccain being a natural born citizen, and barry signed a resolution that he was not a natural born citizen,,,RESOLUTION
Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.
Whereas the Constitution of the United States requires that, to be eligible for the Office of the President, a person must be a `natural born Citizen’ of the United States;
Whereas the term `natural born Citizen’, as that term appears in Article II, Section 1, is not defined in the Constitution of the United States;
Whereas there is no evidence of the intention of the Framers or any Congress to limit the constitutional rights of children born to Americans serving in the military nor to prevent those children from serving as their country’s President;
Whereas such limitations would be inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the `natural born Citizen’ clause of the Constitution of the United States, as evidenced by the First Congress’s own statute defining the term `natural born Citizen’;
Whereas the well-being of all citizens of the United States is preserved and enhanced by the men and women who are assigned to serve our country outside of our national borders;
Whereas previous presidential candidates were born outside of the United States of America and were understood to be eligible to be President; and
Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That John Sidney McCain, III, is a `natural born Citizen’ under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.