10 Responses to “Big-name legal scholars are giving validation to Donald Trump’s attack against Ted Cruz”

1. DSP2
   January 13th, 2016 @ 1:08 pm

   Not again, is Ted’s birth certificate on an outdated form prior to 1970?

   https://twitter.com/umpire43/status/685854430911008769

2. The Constitution...
   January 13th, 2016 @ 1:39 pm

   Well, I think this is bad enough to post again, that was posted the other day…

   https://thehornnews.com/gops-secret-plan-to-stop-trump/

   I’m hoping that Trump will see this post, and I will also send this to his staff, to make sure he gets this!

3. Kevin J Lankford
   January 13th, 2016 @ 2:21 pm

   @ #1 dsp2;

   cruz’s birth certificate along with the fact that he is fathered by a foreign subject is indisputable proof, at least to the educated which one would expect of any one claiming to be a “legal scholar’ or “Constitutional expert”, that he can in no way be considered a “Natural Born” U.S. citizen.

   The real question should be is, where the heck were these claimed “scholars” when they were voter frauding the foreign infiltrator obama into our white house.

   Only the ignorant, traitorous liars, or cowards, refer to obama as president. Only the ignorant, traitorous liars, or cowards, claim cruz, rubio, or jindal, are “Natural Born” U.S. citizen.

4. Steve Wittlake
   January 13th, 2016 @ 2:36 pm

   Ted Cruz is supposed to be an extremely smart lawyer. It really surprises me that he would try this pull this stuff regarding natural born citizen.
   He know very well that every Naturalization
   law uses the word Citizen instead of natural born except the 1790 Naturalization law which was a stupid mistake and was corrected by 1795 Naturalization law. The 1790 Naturalization law violated the Constitution and had to be changed or approved by 3/4 of the States.
   Also, he hides everything from everyone under privacy law. All this Canadian and hidden divorce stuff should have been out in the open not hidden.

5. Paula Hoehn
   January 13th, 2016 @ 4:38 pm

   Dear Orly,

   Here is a little more of the puzzle of Ted Cruz’s ancestry, it appears that his mother Eleanor Darragh Wilson’s first husband was George Dennison WILSON, Jr., (9th cousin 3x removed, and a 1956 grad. of Rice Univ) and was born 8 AUG 1933 in Houston, Harris Co., TX; died 25 MAY 1976 in Houston, Harris Co., TX:

   https://wc.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?op=GET&db=dowfam3&id=I475252

   · ID: I475252
   · Name: George Dennison WILSON , Jr.
   · RELA: 9th cousin 3x removed
   · Sex: M
   · Birth: 8 AUG 1933 in Houston, Harris Co., TX
   · GRAD: 1956 Rice University
   · Death: 25 MAY 1976 in Houston, Harris Co., TX
   Father: George Dennison WILSON b: 10 JUN 1903 in Houston, Harris Co., TX
   Mother: Margaret Elizabeth BAILEY b: 23 MAR 1906 in Calvert, Robertson Co., TX
   Marriage 1: Living DARRAGH (this is Eleanor Darragh Wilson Cruz)

   —–

   https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:K38B-2B4

   Name George Dennison Wilson
   Event Type Death
   Event Date 25 May 1976
   Event Place Houston, Harris, Texas, United States
   Gender Male
   Marital Status Single
   Birth Date 08 Aug 1933
   Birthplace Houston, Texas
   Father’s Name George D Wilson
   Mother’s Name Margaret Bailey
   Certificate Number 37349

   ——–

   Eleanor Darragh Wilson and George Dennison may possibly have married in 1958 but where? And what is not known is when did they divorce and where?

   Also, not known when did Rafael Cruz and Julia Anne Garza divorce and where, and were both divorces finalized (and where) before Rafael Cruz and Eleanor Darragh Wilson married some time before Ted Cruz was born in Canada on Dec 22, 1970 and where were they married, and did they take out Canadian citizenship?

   The answers matter in proving Ted Cruz’s non-eligibility. Is he even a naturalized citizen of US? Is he possibly an anchor baby of Canada and an illegal in the US?

   Just as many unanswered questions as background of usurper-obummer. America deserves answers to these questions.

   ——-
   Paula Hoehn

6. bob69
   January 13th, 2016 @ 5:34 pm

   Members of Congress are currently being told they can be charged with misprision of treason for refusing to act or even speak out about Obama’s usurpation of the presidency. Cruz and Rubio should also be reminded they may have to return the money being donated to them under the false pretense that they are eligible to hold the office of president.

7. Steve Wittlake
   January 13th, 2016 @ 5:39 pm

   I think they were married in a Catholic Church in 1958 in Houston and it is not listed because in Texas both have to be deceased before State lists. 1st wife of Rafael deceased.

8. Steve Wittlake
   January 13th, 2016 @ 5:45 pm

   More Bad news for Ted Cruz. He borrowed money from wife’s employer and did not disclose money. Would say the end I think will be coming for Ted.
   There is something regarding that he was not eligible for the Senate. Check the internet.

9. Philip stone
   January 13th, 2016 @ 6:55 pm

   Was there a record of Cruz mother and father voting in Canadian election in 1974? Would this require Canadian citizenship?

10. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    January 14th, 2016 @ 12:35 am

    I thought that marriage records are public records

Leave a Reply