14 Responses to “DONALD TRUMP Calls for “Total and Complete Shutdown” of Muslims Entering US”

1. Danny Stewart
   December 7th, 2015 @ 5:25 pm

   Best idea I have heard in a long time. Go Trump, our only hoe to save the USA.

2. Danny Stewart
   December 7th, 2015 @ 5:27 pm

   Previous comment should say “our only HOPE to save the USA”.

3. Veritas
   December 7th, 2015 @ 7:16 pm

   During World War II FBI agents of German extraction who were bilingual in German and English routinely sat in German Catholic and Lutheran churches to listen to the priest or pastor’s sermons and listen in on congregants’ conversations.

   Most were happy that any Nazi sympathizers would be found out, as they loved the USA above all things.

   Muslims who love America should WELCOME scrutiny until there is security; the precedent was set 70 years ago.

   Trump sounds like a reincarnation of the GREATEST GENERATION with a gift of clarity and bravery.

4. Paula Hoehn
   December 7th, 2015 @ 7:33 pm

   Dear Orly,

   56:18 min Video: Full Speech: Donald Trump EXPLOSIVE Rally on USS Yorktown (12-7-15)

   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_7Ij-7YmDfs

   —–
   Paula Hoehn

5. David
   December 7th, 2015 @ 8:00 pm

   Trump has an uncanny vision for future events which always seem to prove him correct. I hope this doesn’t foreshadow a WMD event in the near future that proves him correct again.

6. GolanHeights
   December 8th, 2015 @ 3:09 am

   The article says: “Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country’s representatives can figure out what is going on.”

   The article about Mr. Trump call to shutdown entering Muslims into US continues: “According to Pew Research, among others, there is great hatred towards Americans by large segments of the Muslim population. Most recently, a poll from the Center for Security Policy released data showing “25% of those polled agreed that violence against Americans here in the United States is justified as a part of the global jihad” and 51% of those polled, “agreed that Muslims in America should have the choice of being governed according to Shariah.” Shariah authorizes such atrocities as murder against non-believers who won’t convert, beheadings and more unthinkable acts that pose great harm to Americans, especially women.”

   The matter is not now only Muslims entering US. It is also the matter of significant Muslim population inside US with direct links to WH.

   Mr. Trump hopes for peaceful 2016 elections in the presence of Mr. Obama still acting as pResident.

   As much attention is needed to remove Mr.Obama as ineligible Federal Employee according to Federal CODE Title 18, United States Code, Section 912 as soon as possible.

7. ramla
   December 8th, 2015 @ 4:43 am

   H.res.198 Would not help us to Remove Mr. Obama Without The Senate

   John:

   We have been discussing the matter whether The House can remove Mr. Obama from the WH without involving the Senate. The suggestion that we have focused on more recently was that the bill H. Res. 198 offering the list of impeachable offences for any impeachment process and the Articles of Impeachment for Mr. Barak Obama drawn by NARC form the basis for that.

   I was not so sure and attempted to spell out the details in order to see that they would constitute a coherent sequence in my latest post. I have asked if my post has exhibited any understanding of the process you have had in mind.

   You wrote:
   [You are correct in your analogy, you have to read thru the lines and the wording to come to the conclusion, if you’ve done that then you’ve done your homework to understand it.]

   I have followed your suggestion and have read carefully H. Res. 198 “Impeachable Offences” again.

   This document has simple organization:
   1)It states its goal: “To establish standards defining impeachable ‘‘high crimes and misdemeanors’’ within the meaning of Article II, Section 4 as applied to the President of the United States.”
   2)It lists a number of clauses that mention related experiences and views expressed in the past with regard to impeachment including quotation of the Constitution on Impeachment, quotation of Alexander Hamilton on same, impeachment precedents including 2 presidents,…
   3)It lists a number of presidential actions that are postulated as high crimes and misdemeanors that would initiate the impeachment process.

   It asserts that upon voting in the House the list of crimes in 3) will be accepted standard for impeachable offences.

   This document H. Res. 198 Impeachable offences does not refer to at least one case in the past for Usurpation of US presidency by a constitutionally ineligible man (Chester Arthur was born in Canada and has served as US President 1981-1985).

   Thus the document appears to assume that an ineligible person cannot be acting as US President. I.e., the document assumes that there are no usurpations of presidency, though it is historically false for USA.

   The starting point of our discussion was for me to find out how to understand your key point:

   [Next (after voting on H. Res. 198), we need the impeachment process to start immediately upon removing the President from office. You do this right after you pass the other bill that’s in committee.]

   This document does not refer to removing the President from the office. The only related term to the removal of US President used in the H. Res. 198 is impeachment. Thus if the Senate would not make an impeachment decision, the removal of the President from office would not follow.

   If the House Judicial Committee has the Articles of Impeachment for Mr. Obama by NARC would this cause removal of Mr. Obama from WH?

   I do not know. But I think as H. Res. 198 focuses entirely on impeachment and on impeachable offenses, it covers up Mr. Obama usurpation of US Presidency and the issue of Mr. Obama ineligibility.

   Instead H. Res. 198 should be focusing on removal of a person acting as US President in cases of usurpation of US Presidency/being not eligible for POTUS and/or presence of impeachable offences.

   H. Res. 198 should be addressing Usurpation AND Impeachment, instead of impeachment alone. In that case, it should have had stipulated that in case of Usurpation, the matter is really not impeachment, but is the matter of removal an ineligible federal employee on the basis of the US Federal Code “Title 18, United States Code, Section 912. It provides that “[w] however falsely assumes or pretends to be an officer * * * acting under the authority of the United States * * * , and acts as such, or in such pretended capacity demands or obtains any money, paper, document, or thing of value, shall be fined * * * or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.”

   H. Res. 198 Should have continued that in case of Usurpation, the House makes the decision on the removal of pResident from the office and on the imprisonment.

   In that case the processing of the articles of Impeachment for Mr. Obama in the House would result in removal of Mr. Obama from the office it currently occupies as the first of these articles establishes the case of Usurpation of US presidency. The House Judicial Committee should have these articles. But I doubt it, as H. Res. 198 does not refer to usurpation or illegal occupation of the office of POTUS.

   It appears to me H. Res 198 rather covers up a possibility of Usurpation of US presidency.

   Finally, I do not see that H. Res. 198 in the form we have it helps any to remove Mr. Obama from the WH.

8. Jerry G
   December 8th, 2015 @ 5:06 am

   Good for Trump. He expresses what people are thinking but are afraid of saying. He is a patriot. Not a politician afraid to voice anything which may be politically incorrect.

9. DSP2
   December 8th, 2015 @ 6:29 am

   Throw this into Obama, Lynch, Johnson and JUDGE HANEN’S faces. islam, by law, is prohibited from US immigration
   The Immigration and Nationality Act passed June 27, 1952 revised the laws relating to immigration, naturalization, and nationality for the United States. That act, which became Public Law 414, established both the law and the intent of Congress regarding the immigration of Aliens to the US and remains in effect today. Among the many issues it covers, one in particular, found in Chapter 2 Section 212, is the prohibition of entry to the US if the Alien belongs to an organization seeking to overthrow the government of the United States by “force, violence, or other unconstitutional means.” This, by its very definition, rules out Islamic immigration to the United States, but this law is being ignored by the White House. Islamic immigration to the US would be prohibited under this law because the Koran, Sharia Law and the Hadith all require complete submission to Islam, which is antithetical to the US government, the Constitution, and to the Republic. All Muslims who attest that the Koran is their life’s guiding principal subscribe to submission to Islam and its form of government. Now the political correct crowd would say that Islamists cannot be prohibited from entering the US because Islam is a religion. Whether it is a religion is immaterial because the law states that Aliens who are affiliated with any “organization” that advocates the overthrow of our government are prohibited.

10. John
    December 8th, 2015 @ 7:00 am

    Go Trump!

    Obama needs to resign NOW.

11. Courage
    December 8th, 2015 @ 7:13 am

    United States encounter with th”Barbay Piraes”.

    https://freedomoutpost.com/2015/12/will-we-learn-from-history-americas-first-war-on-terror/

12. Courage
    December 8th, 2015 @ 8:40 pm

    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/12/flashback-jimmy-carter-banned-iranians-from-us-deported-iranian-students-during-hostage-crisis/

13. Courage
    December 8th, 2015 @ 9:58 pm

    Whether one pushes Islam as a religion is irrelevant. It’s ideology is opposed to America and her laws, including her Constitution.
    Read more at https://freedomoutpost.com/2015/12/islamists-communists-totalitarians-prohibited-law-immigrating-us/#MtA7Ohbx2DGvPfkB.99

14. Courage
    December 8th, 2015 @ 10:17 pm

    https://www.westernjournalism.com/watch-trump-just-went-after-msnbc-so-hard-they-cut-to-an-unscheduled-commercial-break/

Leave a Reply