9 Responses to “my response to the supporter of Ted Cruz”

1. Steve Wittlake
   December 6th, 2015 @ 11:47 am

   Here is why Ted Cruz does no qualify. First of all there is no Automatic Naturalization in this Case which you will see when I attach law. 2nd Ted returned his Canadian citizenship for revocation thinking in this case I guess that he had Automatic Naturalization citizenship for USA. He did not even mention revocation of Canadian birth records when he appeared before New Hampshire election board.
   I do not know if Ted’s parents were married but I know they were in Canada for at least 4 years.

   https://mail.google.com/mail/?pc=topnav-about-en#inbox/151745b95960c603

   Birth Abroad to One Citizen and One Alien Parent in Wedlock

   A child born abroad to one U.S. citizen parent and one alien parent acquires U.S. citizenship at birth under Section 301(g) of the INA provided the U.S. citizen parent was physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for the time period required by the law applicable at the time of the child’s birth. (For birth on or after November 14, 1986, a period of five years physical presence, two after the age of fourteen, is required. For birth between December 24, 1952 and November 13, 1986, a period of ten years, five after the age of fourteen, is required for physical presence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions to transmit U.S. citizenship to the child.) The U.S. citizen parent must be the genetic or the gestational parent and the legal parent of the child under local law at the time and place of the child’s birth to transmit U.S. citizenship.

   Birth Abroad Out-of-Wedlock to a U.S. Citizen Mother:

   A person born abroad out-of-wedlock to a U.S. citizen mother may acquire U.S. citizenship under Section 309(c) of the INA if the mother was a U.S. citizen at the time of the person’s birth and if the mother was physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year prior to the person’s birth. The U.S. citizen mother must be the genetic or the gestational mother and the legal parent of the child under local law at the time and place of the child’s birth to transmit U.S. citizenship.

2. Leonard
   December 6th, 2015 @ 12:12 pm

   I agree With You Orly.Trump is the ONE….

3. Steve Wittlake
   December 6th, 2015 @ 3:20 pm

   https://newswithviews.com/JBWilliams/williams317.htm

   TED CRUZ IS IN THE US SENATE ILLEGALLY?

   By J.B. Williams
   December 4, 2015
   NewsWithViews.com

   US Senator Ted Cruz from Texas, has been under fire in his bid for the White House due to his Canadian citizenship records which make it quite clear that he does not meet the Constitutional “natural born Citizen” requirement for the Oval Office, despite the opinion letter from his Harvard friends.

   Following a total lack of vetting on Barack Hussein Obama in 2008 and 2012, many insist that no one ever enter the Oval Office again without proper vetting, including proof of meeting all Constitutional requirements for office. Obama’s massive destruction of our Constitutional Republic has placed the issue of Constitutional eligibility on the front burner for many Americans, and partisanship has nothing to do with it.

   In the effort to vet every 2016 presidential candidate, Cruz, who had once stated that both he and Barack Obama were ineligible for the Oval Office, found himself under tight scrutiny from the same people who tried to stop Obama from taking the Oval Office via fraud. Ted placed himself in the crosshairs of constitutionalists who do not care about partisan politics, by seeking an office he is not eligible to seek.

   In investigating Cruz eligibility for the Oval Office, his eligibility for the US Senate came into question…

   The Constitutional requirements for the US Senate are as follows;

   “No Person shall be a Senator who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty Years, and been nine Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State for which he shall be chosen.”

   At 42 years old in 2012, Ted Cruz obviously met the age requirement of 30 years. However, he also needed to meet the requirement of at least “nine Years a Citizen of the United States.” As the Constitution states, one cannot be just an “Inhabitant of that State for which he shall be chosen.”

   The known source for the Founders use of the term natural born Citizen, The Law of Nations, also defines “Inhabitant” as follows;

   § 213. Inhabitants.

   “The inhabitants, as distinguished from citizens, are foreigners, who are permitted to settle and stay in the country. Bound to the society by their residence, they are subject to the laws of the state while they reside in it; and they are obliged to defend it, because it grants them protection, though they do not participate in all the rights of citizens. They enjoy only the advantages which the law or custom gives them. The perpetual inhabitants are those who have received the right of perpetual residence. These are a kind of citizens of an inferior order, and are united to the society without participating in all its advantages. Their children follow the condition of their fathers; and, as the state has given to these the right of perpetual residence, their right passes to their posterity.”

   Today, the legal term for this condition in the United States is “illegal alien,” someone in our country and living under U.S. jurisdiction, without legally belonging to society. Modern social justice attitudes often refer to these people as “undocumented citizens” which of course are not citizens at all. Our I.R.S. created a new class of “citizen” for the purpose of collecting taxes from illegal aliens, “resident alien” which is an inhabitant (not a citizen) who pays taxes.

   Contrary to current leftist social justice ideologies that view all “illegal aliens” in the U.S. as only “unauthorized” or “undocumented” citizens, our laws identify them as nothing more than “illegal aliens,” or “resident aliens” who pay taxes under I.R.S. codes.

   Further, in any matter of law, authenticated evidence supersedes any and all politically motivated opinions, especially opinions which are either unfounded or poorly founded. Unlike Barack Hussein Obama who posted three forged U.S. Certifications of Live Birth and later a Hawaiian newspaper announcement of his birth to evidence his Oval Office eligibility, Ted Cruz issued his Canadian Birth Certificate as evidence of being “born a citizen of Canada.”

   The above Canadian document is proof of Canadian Citizenship at birth for Senator Ted Cruz. The next piece of authenticated evidence released by Ted Cruz is a Canadian document proving that he remained a legal citizen of Canada until renouncing that citizenship in May of 2014, which means, he was still a legal citizen of Canada in 2012 when he ran for, was elected and took the oath of office for the US Senate.

   Again, the above authenticated evidence proves that Ted Cruz was born Canadian in 1970 and remained a legal citizen of Canada until renouncing his Canadian citizenship in May of 2014. These official documents also prove that Ted Cruz was a legal citizen of Canada in 2012, when he sought and claimed a seat in the U.S. Senate as a legal US citizen.

   As a result of this damning evidence, the Cruz campaign hired friends at Harvard to issue a letter which makes a legal case for how Ted Cruz (and Barack Obama) might be a natural born Citizen of the United States eligible to seek the Oval Office. However, a legal opinion letter is not equal to, nor does it supersede authentic evidence to the contrary.

   It is possible for a child to be born outside of the United States, and still acquire legal U.S. citizenship at birth through a parent, according to U.S. Naturalization codes pertaining to “Citizenship at Birth for Children Born Outside the U.S. and its Territories.” If the related conditions are met, a child born outside of the United States to one U.S. Citizen parent, in this case, Ted’s mother, the parents can file for and receive U.S. Citizenship for the child by filing a CRBA form with a U.S. Consulate at the time of birth.

   The statutes governing this naturalization process state;

   “A child born abroad to a U.S. citizen parent or parents may acquire U.S. citizenship at birth if certain statutory requirements are met. The child’s parents should contact the nearest U.S. embassy or consulate to apply for a Consular Report of Birth Abroad of a Citizen of the United States of America (CRBA) to document that the child is a U.S. citizen. If the U.S. embassy or consulate determines that the child acquired U.S. citizenship at birth, a consular officer will approve the CRBA application and the Department of State will issue a CRBA, also called a Form FS-240, in the child’s name.”

   According to related U.S. laws governing “Citizenship at Birth for Children Born Outside the U.S. and its Territories,” the following conditions had to be met in order for Ted Cruz to legally claim U.S. citizenship at birth via these naturalization statutes, through his mother.

   The U.S. citizen parent had been physically present in the U.S. or its territories for a period of at least five years at some time in his or her life prior to the birth, of which at least two years were after his or her 14th birthday.

   If the U.S. citizen parent spent time abroad in any of the following three capacities, this can also be counted towards the physical presence requirement:

   • Serving honorably in the U.S. armed forces;
   • Employed with the U.S. government; or
   • Employed with certain international organizations.

   Additionally, time spent abroad by the U.S. citizen parent while the U.S. citizen parent was the unmarried son or daughter and a member of the household of a person who meets any of the three conditions listed above can also be counted.

   Ted’s parents were at no time serving in the U.S. Armed Forces, employed by the U.S. Government or by any of the certain international organizations, during their eight years in Canada, between 1966 and 1974. Further, Ted’s father Rafael, was at no time a legal citizen of the United States prior to naturalizing in 2005, from Canada. Rafael’s known legal citizenship status as of 1970 was Cuban, not American.

   This is an EXAMPLE of a US CRBA Form

   Unfortunately, there is no evidence to suggest that the parent or parents of Ted Cruz ever filed a CRBA form with the U.S. Government in or around 1970, which is why Ted Cruz released a copy of his Canadian citizenship records and not any U.S. citizenship records. At present, all FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) requests filed in search of any U.S. citizenship documents to confirm the true official U.S. citizenship status of Ted Cruz have been denied access. All citizenship records for Ted Cruz are sealed unless and until Ted Cruz agrees to allow any such records to be released by either U.S. or Canadian agencies.

   As a result, there remains no authentic evidence to support the claims that Ted Cruz is either a “natural born” or “naturalized” citizen of the United States.

   Without any form of U.S. Citizenship documentation, and proof of Canadian citizenship at birth in 1970 and holding that legal status until May 2014 when he renounced his birth citizenship to Canada, there is no way for Ted Cruz to prove that he is either “natural born” and eligible for the Oval Office, or “naturalized” prior to 2012, when he sought and accepted a seat in the U.S. Senate as a legal citizen of Canada.

4. tim
   December 6th, 2015 @ 5:38 pm

   Orly is right. Ted Cruz is NOT eligible to serve as President, nor as Vice-President. The facts of his situation are obvious, and inarguable. Look at the parallels:

   Cruz: born in a foreign country to an American mother and a foreign father.

   Obama: born in a foreign country to an American mother and a foreign father.

   If Obama is ineligible, then so is Cruz — and on identical grounds.

   If Cruz is eligible, then all of us have wasted the last EIGHT YEARS dealing with Obama.

   Mr Cruz’ supporters cannot have it both ways. If he is eligible, then so is Obama. Mr Cruz’ supporters try to pretend otherwise, and make themselves look ridiculous in the process.

5. American Patriot
   December 7th, 2015 @ 2:48 pm

   Great post, Orly!

   Yes…you’ve had him pegged for a long time!

   And I do appreciate your having the courage to post this, when I also gave you an email stating that one of the members of our Congress was now supporting Cruz!

   This was/is something now that I can’t still believe!

   Or…is this something that that person, who supports him, is doing so, till Cruz decides to stop this fiasco and quit,like Jindal did?

   Which, then, would allow him to then support another candidate, even after he said he’s “all in” for Cruz!!! Wild stuff!

6. Steve Wittlake
   December 7th, 2015 @ 6:03 pm

   People need to write the Attorney General of New Hampshire and challenge the information that
   Ted Cruz provided. One thing he allegedly never provided information regarding his revocation of birth certificate to Election Commission, or a marriage record for parents and there is no Automatic Naturalization for children in Birth Abroad to One Citizen and One Alien Parent in Wedlock or Birth Abroad Out-of-Wedlock to a U.S. Citizen Mother. Look at above 2 cases which do not make Ted a citizen of USA and Automatic Naturalization is not allowed under above 2 cases and does not make Ted a natural born citizen. Let’s all write the Election Commission regarding this matter.

7. Steve Wittlake
   December 7th, 2015 @ 6:27 pm

   https://trailblazersblog.dallasnews.com/2015/11/regardless-of-canadian-birth-ted-cruz-survives-ballot-challenge-in-new-hampshire.html/

   Get this article and read

8. Courage
   December 8th, 2015 @ 6:57 am

   This makes Trump even more attractive.

   https://www.thedailysheeple.com/this-is-how-much-big-business-paid-us-senators-to-fast-track-the-tpp-deal_122015

Leave a Reply