17 Responses to “Gravis/OAN poll: Trump 36%, Carson-22%, Rubio-11%, Bush-8%. Trump needs to order an Iowa poll from Gravis to see if the establishment pollsters started rigging polls to go to the establishment scenario: announce first that Carson beat Trump and later that either Bush or Rubio overcame Carson. I believe the ruling mafia had this scenario all along”

1. Analyst...
   October 27th, 2015 @ 10:29 am

   That poll is more true than the pinnie-winnie poll.

   Carson has no real experience in business, compared to Trump.

   And now that I think of this, Trump maybe used the Apprentice Show, in order to get some people to help take care of his businesses, while he takes a run at the WH…?!

   And that poll in Iowa smacks of a set up with (D)’s loading up with democratic voters???!

   Trumper, keep plugging away. I read where Carson is thinking along lines of the Rev. Al Sharpton, when it comes to illegal immigration!

   We don’t need any carbon copies pushing racism!

2. Analyst...
   October 27th, 2015 @ 10:37 am

   And who would vote for Carson, since he has no idea in how to solve America’s gravest problems!

   And if he refutes this, he’s a liar!

   And…after what O has done to us, does anyone really think that another black person would really try to solve things? I think his train of thought would be slanted towards the black community!

   And no one even asks this guy what he would do to protect America against: illegal immigration, the TPP, china, Iran, the dollar, our economy, not allowing the IMF to destroy our present currency???? Etc., etc.!

3. Analyst...
   October 27th, 2015 @ 10:42 am

   And…why doesn’t the people who are pushing Carson to succeed, actually think of a better black candidate for the Oval Office, like Dr Alan Keyes????

   It’s cause he’s a (R) and Carson is probably a Rino in disguise?! Carson seems to follow (D) line of thought!

   I wouldn’t trust Carson on a bet!

4. Gladys
   October 27th, 2015 @ 11:37 am

   Oh my God……sera que los mafiosos ya comenzaron a manipular los numbers……I hope t….

5. Thomas
   October 27th, 2015 @ 11:37 am

   Orly, The Polls are “RIGGED” the Same way The Ballots are… People Have TOO MUCH Trust in The Media… They are as Criminal as The Politicians !!! It is the Truth, Sad Huh ?

6. Veritas
   October 27th, 2015 @ 1:53 pm

   Odd the absolute editorialization at FOX that “for the third time in a row” Trump is in second place….very sloppy fauxnalism, as the CBS poll has T/C tied and another a spread of 4 pts within the margin of error. Fox would be praiseworthy if it examined these realities and let the viewer come up with the headline. One fears that there are elements of Yellow Journalism now active at FOX making it indistinguishable at times from other “out there” outlets.

7. Veritas
   October 27th, 2015 @ 2:03 pm

   The New Poll (NYT) on FOX showing Carson ahead NATIONALLY is based on only 575 Rep. voters with a huge 6% margin of error…

8. Veritas
   October 27th, 2015 @ 3:30 pm

   Even HUFFPO more reliable than Fox on this, as it shows Trump AHEAD in the aggregate and indicates the NYT poll as the outlier:

   https://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/2016-national-gop-primary

9. Kevin J Lankford
   October 28th, 2015 @ 2:23 am

   Can’t consider any pole spiked with two “anchor babies” and a “canadian anchor baby” credible.

10. Extirpates
    October 28th, 2015 @ 9:18 am

    Any poll released by such “objective” sources as the Waste of Times and SeeBS not be slanted?

11. Rich
    October 28th, 2015 @ 9:44 am

    It’s all a smokescreen folks. The only way to win an election is to make the democrats run on their record and make that the issue. We would not have 94 million people of working age sitting home on deficit spending iF ANY GOP CANDIDATE HAD BEEN ELECTED INSTEAD OF OBAMA. If we allow the voters to hear nothing but the liberal gay message that blames ANYBODY in the GOP leadership for the mess we are in WE WILL LOSE. The candy put on the table by democrats is too powerful to overcome otherwise. History proves it. I know it is the primaries but don’t forget how democrats and crossover voters pick our candidates.

12. Steve Wittlake
    October 28th, 2015 @ 1:47 pm

    Ted Cruz is not a Canadian Anchor baby. He is a son of a Cuban born father and a natural born USA mother who was born in Canada. If Ted Cruz had not returned his Canadian citizenship for revocation he would be a Automatic Naturalized Citizen under 1940 and subsequent Naturalization laws. The revocation of Ted Cruz’s Birth Certificate by himself does not make Ted Cruz anything but a stateless person.
    We are all going to find out before to long that Clinton has had the Kenyan birth certificate of Obama for at least 5 years which she secured from the British Government.
    After Clinton obtained the birth certificate the British government placed a secrecy attachment for 20 years. The story is on the internet. Read it for yourself. I sure Trump has also obtained the birth certificate. It is time to quite letting pople like Cruz, Jindal and Rubio get away with violating the Natural Born clause of the Constitution.

13. Veritas
    October 28th, 2015 @ 5:06 pm

    WOW! Trump with 70% of the ELECTORAL COLLEGE VOTES?
    —-

    https://powderedwigsociety.com/trump-kills-hitlery-in-head-to-head-matchup/

14. Jim Buzzell
    October 28th, 2015 @ 9:51 pm

    Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, and Bobby Jindal, who I like, always says the right thing except when it comes to their birth citizenship which makes them ineligible for POTUS. Have any published there verified birth certificates? You cannot, according to our Constitution succeed, to the Presidency based on being a US citizen only. Our Constitution requires a Natural Born Citizen, which Cruz, Rubio & Jindal are not. Our Founding Father used the Law of Nation as a reference source when forming our nation and drafting our Constitution and therefore the Law of Nations more definitively describes the requirement referred to in Article II of our Constitution, read this from Volume One:
    §212. Citizens and natives.
    “The citizens are the members of the civil society: bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to [218] all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see, whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.”
    Cruz, Rubio and Jindal are all attorneys and knows better, Cruz even clerk at the Supreme Court, are they all self-serving, pandering or simply another covert Progressive furthering their movement?

15. Steve Wittlake
    October 29th, 2015 @ 11:54 am

    https://www.apfn.org/apfn/obamas-birth-certificate.htm

    WHERE LIES GO TO DIE – Evidence discovered shows British Protectorate of East Africa recorded Obama’s birth records before 1963 and sent returns of those events to Britain’s Public Records Office and the Kew branch of British National Archives.
    A request for information from the BNA on the specification of birth information contained in the series of thousands of logs indicates that only vital events registered in Kenya’s Ministry of Health offices were recorded in the registration returns and were placed in the National Archives care before they reached 30 years old (the law was amended to 20 years after creation in 2010).
    The line records do not specify the identity or names of the children, only gender. However, the line records are associated with index numbers of actual microfilm copies of certificates, licenses and registration applications filed in the archives. According to researchers, Obama’s line records were discovered in Series RG36, reference books. Not surprisingly, when researchers specifically requested access to the relevant microfilm for the Obama birth registrations, they were told that the records were currently held under an outdated “privileged access” status, meaning researchers were denied access under Chapter 52, Sections 3 and 5 of the British Public Records Act of 1958.
    However, evidence shows these records were available for public access before August of 2009, the approximate date of arrival of Hillary Clinton in Great Britain during her trip to Africa that year.

16. Treason is Rampant...
    October 30th, 2015 @ 1:43 pm

    Wow! It looks like Hillary has a very important doc!

    I think she has some leverage this way, to keep O from playing too many games with her…as I saw a comment, recently, where she told him to “call off your f___ing dogs!”

    Boy, Orly really smelled a rat, back in 2008! And it seems like O is not whom he declares he is: just a helpful person to the down-trodden?!

17. Steve Wittlake
    October 30th, 2015 @ 2:35 pm

    Keep an eye on the internet for Obama’s health.
    That Kenya birth certificate may not do Hilary any good. I bet there are other people that also
    have that birth certificate.

Leave a Reply