Trump is surging again, leads the field in GA with a huge 13% margin: Trump-31%, Carson-18%, Fiorina-13%
Posted on | September 29, 2015 | 22 Comments
| Tuesday, September 29 |
| Race/Topic (Click to Sort) | Poll | Results | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Georgia Republican Presidential Primary | WSB/Landmark | Trump 31, Carson 18, Bush 8, Fiorina 13, Cruz 8, Rubio 9, Huckabee 4, Kasich 2, Paul 1, Christie, Jindal, Graham, Walker, Perry | Trump +13 |
Category: Uncategorized
Comments
22 Responses to “Trump is surging again, leads the field in GA with a huge 13% margin: Trump-31%, Carson-18%, Fiorina-13%”
Leave a Reply
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
September 29th, 2015 @ 10:52 am
Ann Barnhardt for VP. What a Great pair they would be. This country doesn’t need a ”
Nice Guy” like Dr. Ben Carson. We are in “Serious Trouble.”
September 29th, 2015 @ 11:21 am
U.S. gives 1,519 engaged in terrorism while under duress – residency asylum.
https://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2015/09/u-s-gives-1519-engaged-in-terrorism-while-under-duress-residency-asylum/
September 29th, 2015 @ 11:25 am
I would like to see Trump counter the liberal debate hosts loaded questions with loaded answers by pointing out why the GOP can’t stop anything they are blamed for not stopping because of the small number of the sitting democratic Senators needed to impeach Obama. Virtually any topic the media routinely smears Trump with can be traced to Obama’s policies.
Orly , could you explain for us the super majority required in in The Senate to impeach Obama that really puts this country at his mercy? It takes 2/3 to impeach so it would only require 44 democrats if all the republicans voted for impeachment. Those democratic senators and republican senators that might vote against impeachment should be taking the heat right now and for what has been ailing us the last seven years.
September 29th, 2015 @ 11:32 am
https://www.wnd.com/2015/09/migrants-discuss-raping-robbing-other-travelers/
September 29th, 2015 @ 11:44 am
Couldn’t agree more Steve.
Thank you, Dr. Taitz, for consistently sharing true polls for Mr. Trump. He is America’s last great hope.
God bless and protect each and everyone of you.
#Trump2016 WILL #MakeAmericaGreatAgain
September 29th, 2015 @ 12:19 pm
you are right, it takes 2/3 to remove from office after the person was impeached by the majority in the House.
Impeachment is like an indictment, and removal in the senate is like a conviction, which means that 34 senators can stop the removal from office. Still, the House could act, but GOP members of the House are too timid to do anything
September 29th, 2015 @ 12:20 pm
https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/09/29/foreign-nationals-issued-temporary-visas-surge-obama/
September 29th, 2015 @ 12:43 pm
It seems to me then if the House acts and it goes to the Senate that gives 34 democrats the ability to acquit Obama and make everything he has done legal. At least keeps us from stopping what he has done.
September 29th, 2015 @ 1:55 pm
Removal of a Top Federal Employee Occupying his federal Office illegally.
There is a Federal statute on that (It may be rooted in US Constitution). A reference to such a Federal Statute is made in one of Dr. Edwin Vieira articles in NewsWithViews
This is a possibility that does not need impeachment, but perhaps a special session of the House of Representative to start the process.
During the special Session of the House:
1.Read the documents that outline the issue of ineligibility for Mr. Obama.
2.Set up committee to investigate the issue
3.Removal Mr. Obama from his office (WH) is after confirmation of the issue.
4. Then send Mr. Obama into prison for no more than 5 years.
What force would push for such a session of the House to occur?
Voters would push their House Representatives to set a Special Session of the House as described above.
September 29th, 2015 @ 1:59 pm
who is going to do it?
September 29th, 2015 @ 2:14 pm
We don’t need to impeach him now, Hillary is going to do this for us. He(Barry Soetoro, Barrack Obama, or whoever he is)will resign when she spills her guts to the media and the American people. Hillary’s campaign is done and on “suicide watch”. The only thing that stands in front of her is V. Jarrett and the White House. There was a dinner last night at the White House and all kinds of people were there, and the only topic of discussion was Hillary Clinton, the talk was,………………….Indictment.
September 29th, 2015 @ 2:15 pm
Thank you Orly. Concerned voters would be able to do this. I think this should be somewhat easier than impeachment. And the Senate need not be involved.
The following is a curiosity of today related to Dr. Ben Carson. His campaign website has an area titled Ask Dr. Carson. So I did. Here it goes.
“Dear Mr. Carson,
I have received your campaign solicitation asking me to stand with you in your fight against political correctness. You wrote:
[Case in point — last week I said that a key part of Islam known as Shariah law was not compatible with the U.S. Constitution and that I couldn’t support a Muslim candidate for President unless these tenets were fully renounced.]
The following is also not compatible with US Constitution, and this concern exists in the US public awareness, books, press and internet since 2008 presidential election campaign of Mr. Obama.
Mr. Obama has been widely considered not eligible to be a candidate for US President. He is still considered not eligible after illegally occupying the position of POTUS, since 2008.
Prominent writers and lawyers have addressed the above issue: former Pennsylvania Attorney General, Berg, Dr. and Attorney. Orly, Taitz, Attorney Larry Klayman, Dr. Jerome Corsi, and many more.
Both of the above issues: yours and that of Mr. Obama are covered up by a thick layer of political correctness and by popular press. My question to you is:
Why do you not address Obama eligibility concern as the most grotesque Constitutional issue obfuscated by political correctness for the past 8 years?
Thank you.
September 29th, 2015 @ 3:36 pm
I agree John don’t impeach and give the DNC a chance to run another corrupt “credible” candidate. Just make the democrats take the heat for what ails us not the GOP and Stop blaming the GOP for what the democrats have done during an election cycle. That is why we can’t win one.
September 29th, 2015 @ 4:15 pm
The Teamsters want to meet with Donald Trump is the beginning of the end of Hillary Clinton.
September 29th, 2015 @ 4:18 pm
I did not see it, where did you find it
September 29th, 2015 @ 4:35 pm
Now I can’t give my sources away like that. Ha, Ha, You will see other union endorsements to follow.
September 29th, 2015 @ 4:44 pm
Let’s just say I live within twenty minutes from Barry & Mochelle, yeah it’s hell having shitty neighbors like that, pisses me off every time I see that helicopter fly over my house.
September 29th, 2015 @ 4:56 pm
When was the last time the Teamsters endorsed a Republican President. It was my good old buddy Ronald Reagan, on Aug.31 1984.
September 29th, 2015 @ 5:16 pm
Uncle Donnie was right Rand Paul is the next one to fall. Rand Paul’s Super PAC just cut him off.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/pro-paul-super-pac-stops-fundraising-until-campaign-corrects-its-problems/article/2573049
September 29th, 2015 @ 5:51 pm
Just out on Breitbart.
https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/09/29/teamsters-withhold-hillary-clinton-endorsement-want-meet-donald-trump/
September 29th, 2015 @ 7:50 pm
Trey Gowdy is now in the mix for Boehners’ replacement! We can only pray that happens. What a contrast in politicians from South Carolina. Trey Gowdy & Lindsey Grahamnesty.
September 29th, 2015 @ 8:32 pm
John:
[We don’t need to impeach him now, Hillary is going to do this for us.]
Why would this be believable? She has been covering for usurper since at least the time of electing democratic presidential candidate in 2008.
[He(Barry Soetoro, Barrack Obama, or whoever he is)will resign when she spills her guts to the media and the American people.] Why would she uproot her political life this way?
[Hillary’s campaign is done…] this can be true.
[… and on “suicide watch”.] I doubt Hillary is on suicide watch. She may lose her campaign. That is she may lose this presidential cycle to get to WH. I do not see a suicide for Hillary here. It might not be even political suicide. She might resume in 2020.
[The only thing that stands in front of her is V. Jarrett and the White House.] These 2 things are unlikely to go away on there own.
This seems to mean that there is nothing going on that would force Hillary to go for impeachment or for illegal Federal employee in WH.
[There was a dinner last night at the White House and all kinds of people were there, and the only topic of discussion was Hillary Clinton, the talk was,………………….Indictment.]
Obama impeachment discussed at WH dinner? Maybe they were discussing how to prevent it from happening?! Yet there appears no such dicussions in House of representatives.