Support Congressman and former Judge of the Supreme Court of TX, Louis Gohmert, he is our only hope to end this horrible Iran nuclear deal. Gohmert is saying, what I said all along, Iran deal is a treaty and needs 2/3 ratification to pass. Dems do not have 2/3
Posted on | September 4, 2015 | 4 Comments
| Veritas |
Submitted on 2015/09/04 at 12:50 pm
Given the Iran deal perhaps Obama can be #5. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) on for Hannity today explaining that the Iran “deal” is really a “treaty” and changes elements of earlier treaties. The Corker Deal, he says, is NOT applicable. He will enter a bill Monday stating that now that the Iran agreement has been read , it is CLEAR it is a treaty and must follow the 2/3 rule to be valid. He also states that Boehner greets him (Gohmert) with “Good Morning, SH*THEAD” when he sees him in the halls of Congress. (He politely paraphrased it to “Poop-head” for the radio audience. That type of behavior and the Republicans’ wanton disregard for the Constitution are beginning to rival Obama’s. Trump is a diamond being polished, and the American people, knowing the real deal, will abandon the wannabe “Moissanites” in the Republican Party with their fake sparkle and little value. |
Comments
4 Responses to “Support Congressman and former Judge of the Supreme Court of TX, Louis Gohmert, he is our only hope to end this horrible Iran nuclear deal. Gohmert is saying, what I said all along, Iran deal is a treaty and needs 2/3 ratification to pass. Dems do not have 2/3”
Leave a Reply












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

September 4th, 2015 @ 3:25 pm
Boehner should look in the mirror in the morning, he’s the only “shithead”. I’d like to find out where Boehner “PoopHead” drinks at, I’d buy him a drink, then I’d kick his poopass, and tell him, his ass whoop’n is from Louie. He will not last through the election, he will be voted out. Everyone in Ohio is shaking their heads right now.
September 4th, 2015 @ 3:43 pm
For Orly Taitz, a comment. Didn’t know how to inform you, so am using the comment section to a different subject. Sorry, hope you understand.
A few days ago you had an article regarding Ben Carlson, etc., it had several comments on it, most notably by a person naming itself as “morgan ward”.
There was a commenter after one morgan ward lengthy comment, suggesting that wards comment was out of subject. “morgan ward” then responded directly to the second comment by a “truly” and sent a too long to read fundamentalist monolog.
Notably though, in the end this “morgan ward” very viciously attacked the second writer with unbelievable words of satan and hell and damnataion and noted that this “morgan ward” was a personal friend of yours and that therefore the words and attack was permitted by you.
Of course, there might be a personal vendetta between the two, however, it seems inappropriate that your website should be used for such an attack. Do you know such a “morgan ward”?
Orly Taitz, thank you for all you do to fairly inform your readers and supporters.
September 4th, 2015 @ 4:33 pm
I have no physical ability to read all comments, particularly lengthy comments and there is a disclaimer on the top of my site stating that I am not responsible for what other people write
September 4th, 2015 @ 5:00 pm
The Plot Thickens:
—
https://pamelageller.com/2015/09/congressional-democrats-paid-by-iranian-lobby-to-support-obamas-nuke-deal.html/