Newsmax and WND are promoting dismissed Arpaio’s immigration law suit, but they did not write 1 single word about Taitz case, which was not dismissed and where the judge issued several orders in favor of Taitz. Did Newsmax and WND become a part of the ruling establishment
Posted on | January 15, 2015 | 1 Comment
Taitz v Johnson, Burwell, Obama October 29 Transcript
Taitz v Johnson motion to produce Executive orders
Taitz v Jeh Johnson et al Motion 11.26.2014
Taitz v Johnson order by Judge Hanen for Obama, Johnson, Burwell to provide information to the court
Taitz v Johnson supplemental brief 11.07.14 filed
Taitz v Johnson List of witnesses for October 29th hearing
Taitz v Johnson supplemental brief and exhibits filed 10.24.14
Taitz v Johnson Reply and Exhibits 10.16.2014
Taitz v Johnson first Amended complaint filed Taitz v Johnson part 2 of SAC
Arpaio Lawsuit Against Obama
Category: Uncategorized
Comments
One Response to “Newsmax and WND are promoting dismissed Arpaio’s immigration law suit, but they did not write 1 single word about Taitz case, which was not dismissed and where the judge issued several orders in favor of Taitz. Did Newsmax and WND become a part of the ruling establishment”
Leave a Reply
January 15th, 2015 @ 9:25 am
Newsmax is a b.s. site. Chris Ruddy the owner is buddies with the Clintons.
WND’s Farah promotes only people he has a financial contract with (Joe Arpaio, Jonathan Cahn, etc.). They even delete Disqus comments that mention you, Orly.
Maybe if you write a book and let WND publish it? LOL.