Shrimpton provided zero evidence to back his claims. Arpaio did not provide any new evidence, which he promised for 3 years. Q and A
Posted on | March 8, 2014 | 6 Comments
| Veritas 2,380 approved |
Submitted on 2014/03/08 at 1:46 pm
Interestingly, Sharon Rondeau on her THE POST EMAIL website, published a piece about Shrimpton whose recent comments are rightly being scrutinized for validity. However, it was pointed out that his comments made earlier were released on Feb 26 and Holder went to the hospital with “elevated hearbeat” on the 27th. Perhaps the latter became worried about the other contentions made by Shrimpton: 1) Obama is NOT EVEN a citizen, said he. Fascinating reading and much food for thought. |
Response from Orly:
No, Shrimpton was appearing at meetings and saying the same for 5 years now, but did not provide a shred of evidence to back it up.
At this point nobody aside from Sharon and Birther report pays any attention to him. The only reason Sharon Rondeau and Birther report are publishing his unsupported 5 year old speeches, is because they have nothing to write about. Sharon, as others in Article2pack did not report on any of my ongoing real cases with evidence for 2 years now. They were Arpaio’s people. Now, as March came and there is no promised “universe shattering evidence” from Arpaio and Zullo, Birther report and others are rerunning an old 2008 speech by Shrimpton to fill the pages of their blogs. They should be going to Arpaio and Zullo and demanding a release the evidence that he promised for March or refund of all the donations given in the past 3 years. Also, as reputable journalists, they should have asked Shrimpton for some evidence to back up his claim: put up or shut up.
Comments
6 Responses to “Shrimpton provided zero evidence to back his claims. Arpaio did not provide any new evidence, which he promised for 3 years. Q and A”
Leave a Reply












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

March 8th, 2014 @ 2:47 pm
True, Shrimpton’s claims, as you point out, should be scrutinized, although he is not the first to conjecture that Stanley Ann is not O’s biological mother.
Nonetheless, it is clear to all, Shrimptonians nor not, that O is NOT who he seems to be or what he wants us to believe he is.
Thank you for always keeping your readers up-to-date!
March 8th, 2014 @ 5:22 pm
As of now, many of Shrimpton’s claims were
already made somewhat by Lord Monckton and by
Linda Jordan and by John Sampson. Not much
should surprise us, except the claims on the
DNA testing. Maybe wait and see if there are
any collateral sources to back up all this
Shrimpton publicity game. After all, there is
a BC archive and other data at Kew Gardens in
London? Huh? ASK ORYR.
March 8th, 2014 @ 7:27 pm
shrimptn id a contract wet boy, just ask the late chris story, and there are people who know who he really works for
March 9th, 2014 @ 9:16 pm
yes, there are people who know who Shrimpton really works for. His outing of proven fraud was an other than subtle message. Wonder if Obama has the brains to figure it out, with a low average I Q, he may remain clueless about the message. Just ask the late Chris Story who Shrimpton really works for
March 10th, 2014 @ 3:02 am
Worth noting that Sharon Rondeau at THE POST EMAIL is reporting that that website will now NOT AIR Michael Shrimpton Interview.
March 10th, 2014 @ 3:46 am
she realized that he is not willing to provide any evidence to back his statements