Shoemaker has no shoes, create of the Healthcare.gov could not log on himself. Should we really trust these people with life and death decisions of our healthcare?
Posted on | October 24, 2013 | 3 Comments
Category: Uncategorized
Comments
3 Responses to “Shoemaker has no shoes, create of the Healthcare.gov could not log on himself. Should we really trust these people with life and death decisions of our healthcare?”
Leave a Reply












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

October 24th, 2013 @ 11:07 am
No! These are politicians who know nothing about healthcare.
October 24th, 2013 @ 2:28 pm
Cheryl Campbell, senior vice president of CGI Federal, admitted to U.S. representative Joe Barton that the obamacare health-insurance exchange web site source code contains hidden, contractually-required language that says applicants have “no reasonable expectation of privacy” at the behest of Obama officials.
https://cnsnews.com/news/article/melanie-hunter/hidden-code-obamacare-website-no-reasonable-expectation-privacy
WHY was this demanded, and WHY do our spineless, so-called representatives TOLERATE such things? What happened to our constitutional protections and guarantees, and their sworn oaths of office? How long before those words appear on the I.R.S. web site? Does this mean that our illegal-alien-in-chief can no longer claim privacy?
October 24th, 2013 @ 3:22 pm
I remember someone saying something along the lines of “The website may not work, but Obamacare does.” I can’t remember if it was Pelosi or Obama himself. Maybe it was someone else.
My response to whoever it was is all of what appears below:
1.) You had the money to get it right the first time.
2.) You had the resources to find the very best people to set up the website the first time.
3.) You had a couple of years to do all this.
If you’re gonna brag about something being so great, why on earth would you make those three very fundamental mistakes I mention above?
I would think that you’d make every effort to get all aspects of this entire issue right the first time.
Something else I just thought of:
Nancy Pelosi said that we had to pass it to find out what’s in it.
No. You read something to find out what’s in it. We’re talking about something that will affect American lives. That’s 300 MILLION (approx) of us. Reading something before passage, in light of millions of lives being affected, is fundamentally important and 100% necessary.
Would a book publisher go publish something before they knew what was in it? Nope.
Passing something to find out what’s in it and publishing something before you’ve edited it both have one major thing in common: Doing so allows for many more mistakes to go unnoticed until unacceptable damage is done.
Of course, if you already knew what was in it before you passed it but said to us “pass it to find out what’s in it,” that right there is a red flag that you’re full of BS on the entire Obamacare law.