OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

I am currently working on the reply to opposition to my Motion for Summary Judgment in relation to release to SS-5, application for SSN of Harry Bounel, which Obama is fraudulently using. I have 17 days sine Sept 16 to submit. This is a first draft for the proposed order part of the reply. I will appreciate responses from my supporters, paralegals and attorneys, who followed the case. I am simultaneously working to the other parts, Grinols appeal and other cases

Posted on | September 21, 2013 | 5 Comments

Proposed order UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE  DISTRICT OF Maryland

 Orly Taitz                                                                § Case # 13-1878

                                    Plaintiff,                               § Presiding Hon. Ellen Hollander

                                                                                    §       

                        v.                                                         §   

                                                                                    §  

Carolyn Colvin , Commissioner of the         §  

     Social Security Administration,                §  

STATEMENT OF FACTS

Plaintiff, , President of Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, Dr. Orly Taitz ESq, filed the legal action at hand under 5 US 552, Freedom of Information Act, seeking release under SSA 120 year rule of SS-5, Social Security application of one Harry Bounel, aka Harrison J. Bounel, born in 1890. Defendant, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Carolyn Colvin, responded and submitted a sworn declaration of DawnWiggins, Deputy Executive Director for the Office of Privacy and Dsclosure (OPD), claiming that the responsive  records could not be located.   

Plaintiff responded and sought a Motion for Summary Judgment in favor of the Plaintiff and presented a prior letter from the same Dawn Wiggins, dated November 16, 2012, where Wiggins stated that records of Harry Bounel could not be released due to considerations of privacy of Mr. Bounel. Plaintiff argued that the first time they searched for records, when request was submitted by another individual, they  somehow did not look at the name of the person, whose records they were searching and stated that the records could not be released due to consideration of privacy of Harry Bounel. Second time, when  the request was made, they claimed tha some secondary information submitted by the plaintiff did not match the record, which in itself confirmed that there is a record for Harrison J. ( Harry) Bounel, but there was some discrepancy in some secondary information plaintiff believed to be correct, such as date of arrival of Bounel to the U.S. and the date of his receipt of the SSN. They also claimed that they could not read the census record provided, due to the fact that the copy was not so good, but if they could read it, and it indeed stated that Bounel was born in 1890, they claimed that they needed Bounel’s death certificate. They did not provide any explanation, why did they need the death certificate, in light of the fact that Taitz quoted 120 year rule verbatim and it clearly stated that the death certificate is not needed for release of SS-5 of extremely aged individuals, like Bounel who were born 120 years ago or earlier.

DISCUSSION

This court rules in favor of the plaintiff for following reason: Defense provided different, often conflicting explanations, which were not credible and not reasonable and conflicted with the rule of law.

Firstly, defense claimed that the first time it refused the release of the records of Harry Bounel due to privacy, it did not look at the name of the individual whose record they were searching. Response by the defense own witness, Dawn Wiggins, clearly showed that Wiggins searched under the name Harry Bounel and Social Security number xxx-xx-4425. If this Social Security number belonged to another individual, they would have stated that there is no record for Harry Bounel with Social security number xxx-xx-4425. The fact that they did not state that indicates that they indeed located a record of Harry Bounel with Social Security number xxx-xx-4425. When they were cornered with the fact that they cannot use the   reason of privacy due to 120 year rule, they sought an excuse, claiming that due to a discrepancy in some secondary information, such as Bounel’s date of receipt of the Social Security number or some other secondary information, they have justification to claim that they ccould not fine records responsive to the request. The court does not have in front of it the required document and does not know if there is any discrepancy in any secondary information.

In order to resolve the dispute thw court orders the Social security administration to release the Social Security application for Harry Bounel that the SSA already located in its first search, and which is obligated to release based on census data, namely     SS-5, Social Security application of Harry Bounel, SSN xxx-xx-4425, who based on Census was born in 1890 and whose records have to be released based on 120 year rule.

Claim by SSA that the death certificate is needed, is not credible, as it contradicts the SSA own 120 year rule, which compels SSA to release the SS5, Social Security application of individuals born 120 years go or earlier.        

Based on aforementioned it is ORDERED and ADJUDICATED that  Defendant, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration, is required to release to the plaintiff SS-5, Social Security Application of Harry Bounel, born in 1890, under the provisions of 120 year rule. Defendant has 10 business days to release aforementioned application.

 

Signed Ellen L. Hollander

US District Judge

________________________________________________________________

Dated

Category: Uncategorized

Comments

5 Responses to “I am currently working on the reply to opposition to my Motion for Summary Judgment in relation to release to SS-5, application for SSN of Harry Bounel, which Obama is fraudulently using. I have 17 days sine Sept 16 to submit. This is a first draft for the proposed order part of the reply. I will appreciate responses from my supporters, paralegals and attorneys, who followed the case. I am simultaneously working to the other parts, Grinols appeal and other cases”

  1. Jim Hoft
    September 22nd, 2013 @ 12:05 am

    Looks good to go.

    Where is the order to put “Carolyn Colvin” in prison for life?

    Keep up the work!

  2. American Fan of Orly
    September 22nd, 2013 @ 12:30 am

    If the judge is an Obama appointee, you have a strong ground, don’t you, to ask that the case be transferred to another judge or court?

    See what they did to Mario Apuzzo in NJ? They first assigned a good judge, and then in the wee hours of the morning of the day after, changed it to someone who was a SDS member and a draft dogger when in college….Puzzo did not want to complain and trusted the system, but lost the case and a lot of good legal research was wasted on that judge.

    If Obama is a usurper (and he is), then her appointment is null and void, and so she has personal interest not to rule in your favor….presuming she will, I think, is fanciful…esp. since political allied of Obama have harassed you for 5 years…I cannot see how a woman with integrity would take such a case, with such an obvious conflict of self interest.

    Otherwise, if you have hope because she is a daughter of Israel, may be that and the fact she was once editor of the American Criminal Law review, might give you some leverage…e.g. emphasize that no criminal tampering with govt. records can undo the Govt’s duty regarding FOIA, nay, the possibility of such, regarding a dead individual, is ground for granting even greater leaway in such FOIA requests, because it is in the interest of all that the general public have access to records which might otherwise prove such tampering, when the govt. officials in charge are oblivious to it, or involved in such tampering…

    cf. https://msa.maryland.gov/msa/mdmanual/39fed/02usd/html/msa11683.html

  3. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    September 22nd, 2013 @ 3:14 am

    really funny

  4. Leslie
    September 22nd, 2013 @ 7:54 pm

    Your reply looks good about people trying to hide Bounel’s SSN info. You have a great determination in fighting a corrupt battle.

    But aside from the reply, when you discuss in court over Obama’s fake BC, I would also mention the fake pixels in the PDF format besides just the multiple layers compared to what I’ve seen in some of your videos. Perhaps that would be of some help.

    Keep up the wonderful work. 🙂

  5. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    September 22nd, 2013 @ 8:00 pm

    please, send me to orly.taitz@hushmail.com an affidavit to that effect

Leave a Reply