12 Responses to “This is the third interview I will be doing. I did not do interviews for a while, as I was busy, but now I am livid about Judge Lamberth refusing to even docket the pleadings and exhibits and covering up flagrant theft of SSN by Obama and by Arpaio, Zullo and Co refusing to file criminal charges on 100% forgery and claiming that using a stolen SSN is not a criminal offence. The word livid is an understatement of the year!”

1. cq
   June 4th, 2013 @ 4:06 pm

   “The Trans Atlantic Partnership”: Obama’s Super Secret Treaty Which Will Push The Deindustrialization of America Into Overdrive

   “The Trans – Atlantic Partnership”: Obama’s Super Secret Treaty Which Will Push The Deindustrialization of America Into Overdrive

   Theeconomiccollapseblog.com
   By Michael, on June 3rd, 2013

   Did you know that Barack Obama has been secretly negotiating the most important trade agreement since the formation of the World Trade Organization? Did you know that this agreement will impose very strict Internet copyright rules, ban all “Buy American” laws, give Wall Street banks much more freedom to trade risky derivatives and force even more domestic manufacturing offshore? If you have not heard about this treaty, don’t feel bad. Obama has refused to even give Congress a copy of the draft agreement and he has banned members of Congress from attending the negotiations. The plan is to keep this treaty secret until the very last minute and then to railroad it through Congress and have it signed into law by October. The treaty is known as “the Trans-Pacific Partnership”, and the nations that are reported to be involved in the development of this treaty include the United States, Canada, Japan, South Korea, Australia, New Zealand, Chile, Peru, Brunei, Singapore, Vietnam and Malaysia. Opponents of this treaty refer to it as “the NAFTA of the Pacific”, and if it is enacted it will push the deindustrialization of America into overdrive.

   Read more: https://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/obamas-secret-tr…

2. js/js
   June 4th, 2013 @ 5:47 pm

   We basically knew that Judge Lamberth was your
   mortal enemy, when he ruled against you on Obot
   eligibility in 2011. He also made fun of you,
   and made sexist demeaning remarks. Lamberth
   should be reprimanded by the DC BAR OF Law.
   HE NEEDS HIS MOUTH WASHED OUT WITH SOAP ALSO.
   IMO. No hope for that dope. He will continue
   to conspire with Holder. Pure evil. IMO.

3. Rod Riddle
   June 4th, 2013 @ 9:14 pm

   Texas Congressman Steve Stockman attended the Arpaio Sheriffs gathering. He heard all the evidence against Soebarkah. With the number of Congressional hearings taking place on numerous scandals, it is now time for Stockman to present ForgeryGate to his colleagues. Texans, barrage his phone lines demanding a full inquiry!

4. The Constitution
   June 4th, 2013 @ 10:18 pm

   Boy, how I wish all these treasonous higher-ups would get their due, ASAP! Hang tough, Orly!

   I’d like to know how anyone could know that the Trans-Pacific garbage is for real? And if so, I think it’s treasonous for any of these nations to be involved with something like this!

   We need to make contact with our members of Congress to check on this, and I will.

5. JAK
   June 4th, 2013 @ 10:49 pm

   I understand that Lamberth the puppet judge recently had some dirty linen aired and he skated off with a promise to be mor respective of the law to avoid any further such embarrassments. What an example of the USA judicial pig slop.

6. leo derosia
   June 5th, 2013 @ 1:03 am

   orly,you must be happy that rest of the country is seeing obama gangsters for what they really are, liars, bullshitters, backstabbers, thugs, stonewallers and criminals.

7. Gillian
   June 5th, 2013 @ 4:57 am

   Besides giving interviews, what are you going to do about it?

8. Here is the Law
   June 5th, 2013 @ 5:22 am

   UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS’ BULLETINJANUARY 2005:

   In 1981 Congress again amended 42 U.S.C.§ 408, changing the offense from a misdemeanor to a felony and adding the language “or for the purpose of obtaining anything of value from any person” before “or for any other purpose.” See Omnibus Reconciliation Act, Pub. L. No. 97-123,§ 4, 95 Stat. 1659, 1663-64 (1981).

   While the House Conference Report accompanying the amendment offers no explanation of the reasons for the change (see H.R. CONF. REP. NO. 97- 409(1981), reprinted in 1981 U.S.C.C.A.N. 2681,2687-88), the text of the amendment makes clear Congress’ intent both to punish a broader range of acts and to impose a stiffer penalty for misuse of the SSN.

   Criminal penalties are provided for: (1)knowingly and willfully using a social security number that was obtained with false information, (2) using someone else’s social security number, or (3) unlawfully disclosing or compelling the disclosure of someone else’s social security number. See H.R. CONF. REP. NO. 97-409 (1981), reprinted in 1981 U.S.C.C.A.N. 2681, 2687.

   Before passage of the 1998 act, the unauthorized use or transfer of identity documents was illegal under 18 U.S.C. § 1028, which included subsections (a)(1) through (a)(6). The unauthorized use of credit cards, personal identification numbers, automated teller machine codes, and other electronic access devices was illegal under another section of the U.S. Code, that is, 18 U.S.C. § 1029 (“fraud and related activity in connection with access devices”). The addition of subsection (a)(7) to § 1028 expanded the definition of “means of identification” to include such information as SSN and other government identification numbers, dates of birth, and unique biometric data (e.g., fingerprints), as well as electronic access devices and routing codes used in the financial and telecommunications sectors.

   Making a false statement on an I-9: A maximum penalty of 5 years in federal prison without parole and a fine up to $250,000.
   Misusing a Social Security number: A maximum penalty of 5 years in federal prison without parole and a fine up to $250,000.

   The reason he didn’t apply is simple:

   “All documents must be either originals or copies certified by the issuing agency. We cannot accept photocopies or notarized copies of documents. We also cannot accept a receipt showing you applied for the document.”

   Get a certified copy of a document showing a BIRTH, marriage or divorce that took place in the U.S.

   What original documents do I need?

   Citizenship
   We can accept only certain documents as proof of U.S. citizenship. These include a U.S. BIRTH CERTIFICATE (HELLO) or a U.S. passport.

   Age
   You must present your BIRTH CERTIFICATE. (If one exists, you must submit it.) If a birth certificate does not exist, we may be able to accept your:

   Religious record made before the age of 5 showing your date of birth;
   U.S. HOSPITAL RECORD OF YOUR BIRTH; or
   U.S. passport.

   Anyone age 12 or older requesting an original Social Security number must appear in person for an interview. We will ask for evidence to show you do not have a Social Security number. Here are examples of documents you can use to prove a Social Security number was never assigned:

   If you lived outside the United States for an extended period, a current or previous passport, school and/or employment records, and any other record that would show long-term residence outside the United States could be used to show you do not have a Social Security number.

   If you have lived in the United States and you are applying for an original Social Security number, we may ask you for information about the schools you attended or we may ask you to provide copies of tax records that would show you were never assigned a Social Security number.

9. Harry
   June 5th, 2013 @ 6:14 am

   These people Work for the Citizens of the U S A.
   They are Crooks ans traitors living off of our dime. The U S Military has got to take over America; “PERIOD. They are all complicit Low Lifes that need to be jailed for life

10. Bruriah Sarah
    June 5th, 2013 @ 6:32 am

    Dr. Taitz

    It is a very good idea for you to do interviews.

    I would suggest having your key points in the back of your mind so that you come across in a positive way.

    Perhaps you can get a videotape of it so that you can post the interview onto your site.

11. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    June 5th, 2013 @ 6:55 am

    top brass of the military was appointed to be the top brass, specifically because they are complicit. there are plenty of corrupt bureaucrats in the military as well

12. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    June 5th, 2013 @ 6:57 am

    can’t you see what I was doing for the past 5 years

Leave a Reply