12 Responses to “Response from Congressman Issa and Congressman Goodlatte”

1. Kay
   April 5th, 2013 @ 3:04 pm

   What was the response?

2. Veritas
   April 5th, 2013 @ 3:29 pm

   WOW!! Some streams of sunshine appearing through the dark clouds of Obfuscation partially (only partially) hiding Obama’s deception…

   ———–

   Warning: You Are About to Read a “Forbidden” Column

   By Diana West (syndicated columnist)

   If these investigations are correct, we are looking at the greatest fraud in modern history as put over by the flimflam administration and enabled by armies of accessories practically everywhere else.

3. Ken S.
   April 5th, 2013 @ 6:22 pm

   where is the forbidden column..can we read it?

4. MR.no no
   April 5th, 2013 @ 7:12 pm

   I write on behalf of the Honorable Bob Goodlatte, United States Representative for the
   6th congressional district of Virginia, and the Honorable Darrell Issa, United States
   Representative for the 49th congressional district of California, regarding subpoenas ad
   testfficandum that we have become aware of in connection with the above referenced proceeding.
   Both subpoenas are dated April 3, 2013, and are returnable on April 18, 2013.
   Rule VIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives requires all Members of the
   House to determine, among other things, whether subpoenas issued to them are “material and
   relevant” and “consistent with the privileges and rights of the House.” See H.R. Rule VIII(3),
   1 13th Cong. (2013) (copy enclosed). To assist Congressmen Goodlatte and Issa in making these
   determinations, please provide me a proffer, in writing, of precisely what information you seek
   as well as how and why it is material and relevant to your case.
   I would appreciate hearing from you by no later than Wednesday, April 10,2013. Due to
   the stringent mail delivery procedures put in place by the House after the anthrax and ricin
   attacks several years ago, please to not communicate with me my ordinary mail at the address
   above. Rather, please use fax (2021226-1360) or electronic mail
   (todd.tatelman@mail.house. gov).
   Re:
   Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to hearing from you

5. Perestroika
   April 5th, 2013 @ 7:55 pm

   %PDF-1.3
   %Derek’s PDF
   4 0 obj
   <>
   stream

6. Rod Riddle
   April 5th, 2013 @ 9:20 pm

   Mr. no no, oh it’s material and relevant alright. I take it you missed the Sheriff Arpaio Press Conference on his findings which backed up everything Dr. Taitz had already uncovered. Call the Maricopa County Sheriffs Office. They will forward the same material Dr. Taitz has. Get you some of that!!

7. JIMBO
   April 5th, 2013 @ 9:32 pm

   “reply” to ken s, go to birtherreport.com Warning: You Are About to Read a “Forbidden” Column

   By Diana West

   This week’s syndicated column

   Get ready for the last straw.

   First, though, I’d like to suggest that anyone reading this column in a local newspaper or news site pat the editor on the back for publishing what in our neo-medieval world of fear amounts to a “forbidden” column.

   Yup, I am about to say something about the Great Barack Obama Identity/Eligibility Scandal again. I know that this is one rich and urgent topic that doesn’t see the light of day in certain so-called news outlets – and I say that from the experience of watching my own syndicated columns fail to appear when covering news of the White House press conference where the president’s long-form birth certificate was unveiled, news of courtroom proceedings in various states on Obama’s ballot eligibility and news of Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s investigators presenting evidence that the online Obama birth certificate is a forgery (and – much – more).

   So be it. This was, as noted, the last straw.

   I refer to something radio host Sean Hannity said on his show this week. He was speaking in rebuttal to a Democrat arguing that racism was a problem among conservatives. As evidence, the Democrat brought up the “birther issue” – the label used to encapsulate any topic related to Obama’s identity documents and constitutional eligibility. Erroneously, it is a label that narrowly connotes, and derisively so, only the belief that President Obama wasn’t born in the United States.

   In fact, the whereabouts of Obama’s nativity is in no way the main bone of “birther” contention, despite the blinkered focus on it by the enforcers of silence. Of far greater concern to me, for starters, is the purportedly original documentation President Obama belatedly provided the American people to attest to his identity.

   I refer to the electronic image of a long-form 1961 Hawaiian birth certificate posted at the White House website. After studying various evidence and demonstrations (which I’ve written about in previous “forbidden” columns), I’ve concluded that this online image is in all probability a forgery.

   So has Sheriff Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse out in Maricopa County, Ariz. So, too, has the Israel Science and Technology website, a national database and directory of science- and technology-related sites in Israel established by Benjamin Netanyahu’s former science adviser, molecular biologist Israel Hanukoglu, Ph.D.

   If these investigations are correct, we are looking at the greatest fraud in modern history as put over by the flimflam administration and enabled by armies of accessories practically everywhere else.

   CONTINUED HERE: https://www.dianawest.net/Home/tabid/36/EntryId/2461/Warning-You-Are-About-to-Read-a-Forbidden-Column.aspx

8. Veritas
   April 6th, 2013 @ 3:59 am

   Ken. The entire article is at ORYR. She dubbed it forbidden as some of her other columns mentioning Obama fraud were scrubbed. Hence she calls it forbidden. Under Obama we are closer to North Korea than to the Western World. Obama is a rapid Dhimmitizer !

9. Larry from RI
   April 6th, 2013 @ 5:54 am

   Diana West’s column is out there in the public
   domain.Very good column. Search her website.
   Will this open the door to truth and the whole
   truth?????

10. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    April 6th, 2013 @ 6:26 am

    iana West works with WND. WND, Corsi, Arpaio, Zullo and Klayman work togeher and promote each other. Klayman promoted Arpaio and Corsi in his complaint and kept out 150 pages of sworn affidavits and records from other officials and experts, which are not less important than the affidavits by Corsi and Arpaio. Zullo continuously does interviews. Bottom line: Arpaio has to file a criminal complaint. Just singing to the chorus, pritching to the converted will not do a …. thing.
    Tell diana West to file a criminal complaint with the FL elections commission, sec of state, DA, AG and seek action, follow up until her state officials bring criminal charges against Obama and his aaccomplices. That is what is needed

11. Veritas
    April 6th, 2013 @ 4:26 pm

    From reading The Post Email’s report on Zullo/Gallups conference, it seems they are going to file a criminal complaint very soon, and are dotting their “i’s” and crossing their “t’s.”

    They said someone had already FLED the USA due to threats? The American public, even those who read about Obamagate and Identity Theft every day, are just seeing how low the Thuggery can go! (although Canada Free Press said a few years ago they had spoken to a very highly placed person at FOX, who said he had received threats also and had been told NOT to talk about INELIGIBILITY at that network! Ouch!)

    There was a compliment about Orly from that group in Sharon Rondeau’s article, in any case, and said they appreciated all Dr Taitz was doing and had done.

12. Richard Nordquist
    April 6th, 2013 @ 4:32 pm

    “Preaching to the choir” is the metaphor you’re looking for, Dr Taitz.

Leave a Reply