Posted on | July 29, 2009 | 11 Comments
|
Colbert Blew It |
Category: Uncategorized
Comments
11 Responses to “”
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
July 29th, 2009 @ 12:49 am
Hi Dr. Taitz,
I saw the ‘interview’ and the first thing I searched on google was ‘orly highly edited interview’. I knew I would find you that way because that’s exactly what the interview was. You obviously made a lot of good points that he did not want anyone to see. Especially compared to the following Huffington interview where it was edit-free. The awkward way it was chopped & diced made it seem like kung-fu cinema. He might as well of overdubbed your dialogue to complete the process.
At any rate, I want you to know that anyone that is following your cases knows just how smart & effective you speak. We are behind you 100% and will support your efforts to the fullest. Additionally, if any Americans believe in Orly’s quality work I urge you to send a quick donation via her paypal to show your support. Here is her account & address:
https://bit.ly/w9DuD
dr_taitz@yahoo.com
Thank you, Dr.
July 29th, 2009 @ 1:04 am
Here is a link where you can hear Dr.Taitz speak edit free, with no manipulation from people scared of her words. It’s an excellent interview she gave on Plains Radio on the day a Los Angeles judge finally agreed to hear the case based on the merits.
THIS IS AN EXCELLENT INTERVIEW WHERE YOU WILL HEAR THE INFORMATION THAT COLBERT DISHONESTLY REMOVED FROM HIS SHOW:
https://www.plainsradio.com/713/7-13-09.mp3
July 29th, 2009 @ 2:20 am
Red white and blue dog,
We know liberals always denigrate those they fear and believe me—they fear Orly and her supporters
In answer to your previous question posted elsewhere–you will need to join Paltalk(free) and check out the R rated political rooms
July 29th, 2009 @ 8:58 am
Orly,
Colbert now made you a National Figure to millions who never heard of you.
Seeing that your name is forever tied to the truth on the NBC issue, that will lead millions to the truth, even if they do not like what they find.
To that extent: you beat Colbert at his own game.
The day will come when Colbert is a name no one remembers, and Dr.Orly Taitz will have a statue in the Capitol Rotunda…
July 29th, 2009 @ 1:08 pm
I tried to warn you of Colbert’s ultimate power through editing. This is why Rush Limbaugh rarely does interviews; he’s been burned by the editors one too many times. When it comes to lib media, you should only allow an interview where you get say over the final cut. Otherwise, they will edit you to look like an idiot, racist, psychopath, conspiracy nut, or whatever else they want you to look like, which we all know you aren’t.
But, thank you for taking it on the chin and allowing someone to humiliate you in order to further the cause of truth. It is much appreciated and that appreciation is heaped upon the appreciation we all have for the unbelievable work you’ve been doing all along.
July 29th, 2009 @ 1:32 pm
Orly,
I just seen the interview with Colbert and you were simply “fantastic”!!! I worried at first because of his dry humor (in my opinion), but the interview went real well. Even though he was poking fun at the “birthers”, he opened up another opportunity to be heard. I LOVED, LOVED, LOVED the comment about digging his father up from the grave and making him a citizen postmordem. Keep up the good work and may God bless you and your family!
July 29th, 2009 @ 9:17 pm
I don’t see why granting his father citizenship postmortem would have any bearing on this case due to the fact that any child born on US soil is automatically a natural-born citizen of the United States. Personally, I find it very difficult to believe Obama was born anywhere but Hawaii simply because the state of Hawaii has declared numerous times his birth certificate is real, and birth notices can be found in two Hawaiian newspapers. That being said I invite anyone here to cite evidence to support your opinions, and I will listen to it with an open mind.
July 29th, 2009 @ 9:44 pm
Quite honestly, I would have loved to have glued his mouth shut. What an idiot man Colbert is.
I was so pleased to hear that Orly planted the seed – re the amount of social service numbers he had, it makes him 119 yrs old. That was good to get out there. People will wonder what is going on. Something came out of it, just a shame the host was a complete jerk.
July 30th, 2009 @ 2:35 am
This is great news because the more this is discussed in the media, the more people who had no clue will begin to ask questions! Fantastic!!!! We are beating them at their own game….. 🙂
July 30th, 2009 @ 11:27 am
Tim https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_born_citizen_of_the_United_States
Typed a bunch more but got an error the site was to busy and lost.
Have a good day bye
July 30th, 2009 @ 11:38 pm
Tim says:
“…any child born on US soil is automatically a natural-born citizen of the United States…
I invite anyone here to cite evidence to support your opinions, and I will listen to it with an open mind.”
Tim, understand that the Obots attempt to blur the distinction between a “citizen” and a “natural born citizen” – a status required for only one office in the country, the Commander-in-Chief (and by reason of succession, the Vice-President, in case he must take the place of the CinC).
After gaining independence from the Crown, the Framers of the Constitution attempted to make a clean break with British Common Law. In its place, they used international law, which was codified in Emmerich de Vattel’s “The Law of Nations” (1758). They ported some of de Vattel’s work into the Constitution, and the Framers, particularly Jefferson and Franklin, often spoke of his book in glowing terms.
The British Common Law claimed as a “natural born subject” anyone born on soil of the British Empire (doctrine of ius soli). The Framers weren’t looking to capture subjects under their power; they wanted to qualify citizens as free men. They used de Vattel’s definition of “natural born citizen,” one born in the country (ius soli) with no loyalty to another sovereign (ius sanguinis). This was common understanding in 1787 and didn’t need to be defined in the Constitution. But de Vattel later revised “The Law of Nations” to spell out that common understanding: a natural born citizen is one born “of the soil” (ius soli, or as normal Americans would say, “under U.S. jurisdiction”) and “of parents who are citizens” (ius sanguinis, “by bloodline”). To have “loyalty to no other sovereign” requires birth on the soil and birth to parents who are citizens. Or to one parent who is a citizen in the case of an immaculate conception, as one might expect in the case of … oh, never mind.
Both major candidates failed to qualify on one or the other of the two criteria. Sen. John McCain was born in 1936 of parents who were U.S. citizens, stationed at Coco Solo Sub Base in the Panama Canal Zone. Ordinarily, a military dependent abroad would be born in the base infirmary or hospital. But the hospital on Coco Solo was not built until 1941, so his mother gave birth to him outsize the Zone, in Colon Hospital in Colon, Republic of Panama, as his birth certificate attests. Sen. McCain qualified by being born “of parents who are citizens,” but failed to qualify by birth on soil under U.S. jurisdiction. Sen. John McCain is a citizen, but not a natural born citizen, no matter how the U.S. Senate attempted to redefine the terms with non-binding Sen. Res. 511. Honorable Senators, changing the Constitution still requires an amendment, ratified by 39 states.
Mr. Obama, on the other hand, may or may not have failed to qualify on either count. By his own admission, at the time of his birth, his lawful father (not necessarily his biological father) was a Kenyan, a British protected subject at that time. At birth, Barack Obama II was governed by the laws of Great Britain. How could a person governed – at birth – by British law be a U.S. natural born citizen? This was the very eventuality that the Framers intended to prevent: a Commander-in-Chief with loyalty to the Crown, or to any other sovereignty besides the United States. He fails to qualify by being born “of parents who are citizens.” End of story.
But some people – in 1787, they would have been called “Tories” – don’t accept that the Constitution was derivative from international law rather than British Common Law. For those people, nothing but location will do to make a person a “citizen”, as they call it… notwithstanding that U.S. citizens traveling outside the country have U.S. citizen babies all the time. Such present-day “Tories” are creating confusion, which won’t stand in a court of law. They say, “Barack Obama was born in Hawaii, which makes him a citizen. End of story.”
Not so fast. First of all, to be the President, it is not enough to be a “citizen”; one must also be a “natural born citizen.”
“No person except a natural born citizen… shall be eligible to the office of President;” U.S. Constitution, Art. II, § 1.
Secondly, it has by no means been established that Barack Obama II was born in Hawaii. The preponderance of the evidence points to Kenya. Everyone there at one time called Barack Obama II a native son of Kenya: the masses and the mixed multitudes, his paternal step-grandmother, Mama Sarah Onyango Obama, his half-sister and his half-brother in Kenya, and even the Kenyan Ambassador to the U.S., Peter Ogego. (The Kenyan government and the Odinga thugs have since corrected what was public knowledge and told people what to say and what not to say.)
We don’t know his birthplace for an absolute certainty as we do his father’s “non-U.S. citizenship.” But if it is indeed the case that he was born in Kenya, then he is not a U.S. citizen by soil (jurisdiction) nor by the citizenship of his father (who was a British protected subject). His only claim would be through his mother, who was 18 at the time of his birth. However, the Immigration and Nationality Act in effect in 1961 (INA of 1952) stated that for a foreign-born child to be a citizen, a parent must have been a citizen for ten years, five years of which must be after age 14. His mother missed the 19 year age cut by nearly five months.
If Barack Obama II was born in Kenya, he is not a U.S. citizen at all, unless he has since been naturalized. He has presented no evidence of naturalization; it would make mock of his claim of natural born citizenship.
On the other hand, no one in Hawaii has any memory of his birth there: neighbors, hospitals, family, friends, or schoolteachers. His maternal grandmother, Madelyn Dunham, died the day before the election. His younger half-sister, Maya Soetoro, said he was born in Queens Medical Center in Honolulu, which turned out to be incorrect. Mr. Obama now claims he was born in Kapi’olani Hospital for Women and Children, but the hospital says they cannot confirm that unless he authorizes release of information… the one thing he has adamantly refused to do, at the cost of around a million dollars paid to three law firms to keep his records secret. If he has nothing to hide, why has he paid around a million dollars to hide it?
The main peg on which the Obots hang their hopes is the FactCheck “birth certificate,” which is not an original birth certificate, but only (claims to be) a Certification of Live Birth, an abstract of a record on the computer database. Until a few days ago, even the Dept. of Hawaiian Lands did not accept such an abstract for proof of Hawaiian ancestry… much less the U.S. State Dept. for issuing passports.
But whatever the Obots claim this computer image to be, a birth certificate or merely a Certification of Live Birth, it is a counterfeit document, a fraud, a forgery, a FAKE. Two counterfeiting and forgery experts have attested it is a forgery, with enough detailed evidence to give anyone a headache.
Last year, “Dr. Ron Polarik” (a pseudonym) spoke to Dr. Alvin Onaka, the Hawaii State Registrar.
“I asked him if Janice Okubo had confirmed that his office produced a 2007 Certification of Live Birth, date-stamped June 6, 2007, with Obama’s birth information on it, and he quickly replied:
‘Absolutely not. No one in our office confirmed it.'”
It doesn’t matter WHAT the Obots claim about their so-called “birth certificate,” or what conclusions they derive from it, or what implications derive from those conclusions, or what pretensions they claim thereby, or what citizenship status they attribute to their usurper-in-chief . . .
it’s all based upon a LIE. Finis origine pendet. Garbage in; garbage out.
Next up: Keyes et al v. Obama et al in U.S. District Court, Santa Ana, California, Judge David O. Carter, presiding, TBA.
Thank you for your attention and your open mind, Tim. I hope this was meaningful and understandable, and I look forward to your response.