Press Release: Motion to Compel Sheriff Arpaio’s appearance at trial filed
Posted on | October 16, 2012 | 12 Comments
Law offices of Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
29839 Santa Margrita ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
10.16.2012
Attorney Orly Taitz filed a Motion to Compel appearance of Sheriff Joseph Arpaio and Investigator Zullo at trial in Taitz, Swihart, Kern, Weyl, Kesler, Ripley v Elections Commission, Secretary of State of Indiana et al.
The trial is set for Monday, October 22nd, 2012 at 10 am. This is an expedited trial for Declaratory Relief and Permanent Injunction preventing Barack Hussein Obama from being on the ballot in the state of Indiana due to elections fraud, due to his use of a last name not legally his, and due to establishing identity based on forged birth certificate, forged Selective Service Certificate and a fraudulently obtained Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425, which was never assigned to him according to E-verify and SSNVS.
Attorney Orly Taitz already secured presence of 7 witnesses, however appearance of Arpaio and Zullo is important, as they, in their capacity of law enforcement officers conducted a year investigation and issued affidavits attesting to forgery in Obama’s IDs. Their presence is needed for authentication of their affidavits.
Supporters are encouraged to be in the courtroom at Indiana Superior Court, Division 14, Honorable Sherry K.Reid, 200 E. Washington str, Indianapolis, Indiana, 46204.
Donors are asked to support attorney Taitz, who is conducting this case pro bono. Donations can be made through paypal or credit card on the web site OrlyTaitzESQ.com, as well as sent to the address above.
End of Press Release
Comments
12 Responses to “Press Release: Motion to Compel Sheriff Arpaio’s appearance at trial filed”
Leave a Reply
October 16th, 2012 @ 7:30 pm
Why is Sheriff Arpaio letting his reputation as a TOUGH Sheriff go do the drain?
October 16th, 2012 @ 9:14 pm
i am worried about something.. and i also wonder if this was done deliberately..
what happens if you go to court on the 22nd and the obama team asks for the judge to change the court date to a later time on acct of the debate..
would he or could he (assuming the judge is a he Lol) change the date. if he can that would mean you spent all that money needlessly bringing witnesses etc..
money i know is a commodity you cant afford to waste.. it sure would tick me off if this trick was pulled
delay the trial till after the election then claim its now to late to da anything about it..
FOR CERTAIN I ASK ALL CHRISTIANS TO BE IN CONSTANT PRAYER ABOUT THIS as we surely will ..
only wish i could do more. like send a few bucks
will
October 17th, 2012 @ 5:50 am
Dear Dr. Taitz,
Why is the lawsuit filed in Arizona filed against Arpaio and Zullo? I thought this was all about the Indiana case?
And what happened to going after that other traitor, John Sampson? He’s in the middle of a political race in Colorado. How can he afford to diss you? Doesn’t he know you can derail his candidacy if you file a lawsuit in Colorado against him?
October 17th, 2012 @ 8:36 am
I had to file a motion to compel, where Arpaio and Zullo are located
October 17th, 2012 @ 9:03 am
Don’t you have to pay their travel costs as well?
October 17th, 2012 @ 9:04 am
The media can’t deny his foreign identity so Frontline does some ‘spin’ on Obama’s claim to be a foreign prince, as nothing more than the imagination of a young kid, feeling inadequate among all those rich kids in Hawaii.
FRONTLINE INTERVIEW Kristen Caldwell Panahou classmate
‘https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/government-elections-politics/choice-2012/the-frontline-interview-kristen-caldwell/’
“I think part of the reason that he came up with being an Indonesian prince or a Kenyan prince to his fifth-grade class was sort of that sense of OK, I feel a little different, so I’d better be something a little fancier, because it was a fancy school. So while not everyone there was wealthy, and not everyone there was Caucasian, despite the reputation, there were a lot of wealthy people at the school. I mean, in high school, an awful lot of kids had their own cars, which I didn’t. I’m pretty sure Barry didn’t.”
October 17th, 2012 @ 10:14 am
It should be clear by now, that when the DOJ dropped their case against Arpaio, it only because they had made a deal.
Clearly, Arpaio is no better that all the other Republicans, who have been blackmailed or otherwise intimidated by the “The Nwords Are Going To Riot”, threat.
October 17th, 2012 @ 1:00 pm
Joe won’t go and
Zullo will make foolo
himself by not appearing.
The money is now in their hands, and what have they to lose if they don’t appear.
The liberal judges won’t sanction then, or fine them, as they are officeers of the law and would expect judicial clemency.
A class action suit should be brought forth and damages set at 3x the amount of money that they absconded from the donors.That should perk their ears up facing a 21 million dollar lawsuit.
When law enforcement officers avoid their duty, jail and balony sandwiches should be their punishment along with losing their property and ill conceived gains.
Thank you’all those supporters who donate to Orly and for the moral, spiritual prayers that accompany your donations.
Her tenacity, determination, intellect and skill will bring the righteous side victory
Look out Joeie and Mikie; the wrath of Orly is breathing down your greasy necks.
October 17th, 2012 @ 2:12 pm
Dr. Taitz
I looked up compelling a witness to testify and this is what I found:
https://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=10.52.040
This has to do with criminal law – not sure how it changes with civil law or whatever this is. The bottom line is that the witness must be furnished with everything they need – including food.
October 17th, 2012 @ 3:11 pm
u go girl!
October 17th, 2012 @ 3:14 pm
this is Wash state and it is relates to criminal law
it is inapplicable here
October 17th, 2012 @ 7:38 pm
Will, more like you and no money would be needed.