13 Responses to “Motion for reconsideration with Arpaio’s findings”

1. Mark
   March 4th, 2012 @ 6:35 am

   With respect to Sheriff Arpaio’s investigation into the Selective Service date stamp from the postal service: Look closely at the bottom of the date stamp. It shows “USPO” (for United States Post Office). The USPO became the United States Postal Service (USPS) in 1970. The Cold Case Posse’s theory that a “2008” USPO hand stamp was altered to make the image above is impossible: There are no “USPO” hand stamps from 2008 but only USPS stamps!

2. Yer CONFUSED
   March 4th, 2012 @ 7:38 am

   MARK is messed up because he missed the obvious and clearly identified misalignment of the stamps YEAR date on the USURPER’S draft document.
   How clearer can a FACT be made to an IGNORANT person?
   A date shown as 1980
   is not the same as the USURPER’s date
   19
   80. The 1980 format is the correct date format.

3. John
   March 4th, 2012 @ 8:07 am

   Dr. Orly,

   The Cold Case Posse claims they used a 2008 USPS Stamp and then cut it to replicate the effect seen in Obama’s Stamp. Obots claim this impossible because Obama’s stamp is USPO and that 2008 USPO stamps don’t exist. The forgers of Obama’s selective service record would have had no trouble swapping the “S” to “O” to create a 2008 USPO Stamp. The challenge was modifying the date to a 2 digit format to make a 4 digit 2008 a 2 digit 1980 stamp. this required cutting the stamp in 2 which the Cold Case Posse has discovered was done. The discrepancy of USPO versus USPS is of little relevance.

4. Torch n Pitchforks
   March 4th, 2012 @ 8:38 am

   They used TWO stamps: One with USPO from any year and another one for the “80”

5. Brad
   March 4th, 2012 @ 9:27 am

   Mark,
   Can you show us the web link for comparison?

6. Thomas/PatriotofPast
   March 4th, 2012 @ 9:44 am

   Dr. Taitz, which email do I send documents to?
   Your Yahoo or your Gmail address?
   I sent the Certified complaint to your Yahoo address, I do not know if you recieved them.
   Please feel free to post them if you wish, I am sick and tired of ALL the BS and Lies!

7. James Durwood Johnson
   March 4th, 2012 @ 10:45 am

   Mark,
   Is possible for you to go into more detail. Are you saying that the “USPO” on Obama Selective Service paper is legit or that the forged “USPO” stamp that was used was made from a different source?

8. James Durwood Johnson
   March 4th, 2012 @ 10:46 am

   Mark,
   Is possible for you to go into more detail. Are you saying that the “USPO” on Obama Selective Service paper is legit or that the forged “USPO” stamp that was used, was made from a different source?

9. James Durwood Johnson
   March 4th, 2012 @ 10:51 am

   Mark,
   Were there “USPS” hand stamps in 2008?

10. Jason
    March 4th, 2012 @ 11:13 am

    Oh Orly….don’t confuse the Obama buttock kissers with the FACTS!

11. Rufus
    March 4th, 2012 @ 11:20 am

    When were Arpaios documents certified and authenticared?

12. orly taitz
    March 4th, 2012 @ 12:38 pm

    orly.taitz@gmail.com

13. MichaelN
    March 4th, 2012 @ 1:44 pm

    @ Mark, who said ……….
    “The Cold Case Posse’s theory that a “2008” USPO hand stamp was altered to make the image above is impossible: There are no “USPO” hand stamps from 2008 but only USPS stamps!”

    Maybe the stamp that the numbers were taken from was a 1908 stamp.

    Not that it matters so much and doesn’t change the fact that 4 digit stamps were used by the post offices, not two digit stamps.

Leave a Reply