OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

on Monday you have to burn the phone lines of the Sec of State of GA, demand to diregard the advisory opinion of Malihi, which is based on nothing but corruption. This rulling stinks, the foul order of BO meddling rises to high heavens. We could not imagine a more corrupt decision

Posted on | February 4, 2012 | 5 Comments

Terence Brennan

I think contacting the SOS is a high priority. I definitely think it is important to be sensible and to the point when writing him. Flaming and threatening is counterproductive. What Mahili did is wrong on many levels.

Mahili’s disregard of evidence begins with Mahili “considering” that Obama was born in Hawaii. There was no such evidence or testimony for that before the Court – and there was evidence was Obama is hiding and lying about all his birth circumstances. So Mahili “considering” that he was born in Hawaii is unfounded by anything within the hearing. The fact is that it is unproven where he was born, or even who his parents were. Of course Obama could have attempted to prove all that but ignored subpoena and chose not to prove anything. “Guilty mind” is the best explanation, ignored by Judge Mahili.

And it goes on. Bad judge it turns out, bad law.

This is more than a bad judgement. It is an entire gift package to Obama. I won’t speculate on Mahili’s motives, but he is so far off base that this smells bad.

It couldn’t be better for Obama if it was all designed in advance.

(1) Mahili excuses Obama from blatant contempt of court, without comment. Now Obama can do that again when he pleases, just as he ignores Congress and issues decrees, and left town to ignore the hundreds of thousands of Tea Party folks who came to Washington.

(2) Mahili has declared that all the evidence and testimony against Obama is worthless. This flies in the face of reason but will be used again and again by Obama’s useful idiots.

(3) Mahili relieved the no-show Obama from having to demonstrate his eligibility under Georgial law in any way whatever. He finds the ravings, total absence of evidence, and unethical behaviour of Jablonski and Obama to be “persuasive”, but deprecates all the actual testimony and evidence in the record.

(4) Mahili’s final gift to Obama is his absurd decision that a “natural born citizen” is anyone born in the US. That statement was surely the top item on Obama’s wish list. You couldn’t give the usurper-in-chief anything nicer that that. And Obama, refusing to come to court, didn’t even need to argue that – it just came spouting out of Mahili’s decision.
Category: Uncategorized

Comments

5 Responses to “on Monday you have to burn the phone lines of the Sec of State of GA, demand to diregard the advisory opinion of Malihi, which is based on nothing but corruption. This rulling stinks, the foul order of BO meddling rises to high heavens. We could not imagine a more corrupt decision”

  1. Birdy
    February 4th, 2012 @ 2:47 pm

    Judge Malihi is absolutely wrong when he states “The Minor Court left open the issue of whether a child born withing the United States of alien parent(s) is a natural born citizen.”

    The court in Minor v Happersett was deciding if Virgnia Minor had the right to vote. They were using a step-by-step logical analysis to form their conclusion. One step was to determine if Virginia Minor was a citizen. To make this decision, they stated “it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also.” This is the condition that Virginia Minor met that allowed the court to conclude that she was a citizen. People who were born in a country of parents who were its citizens, as a group, had a common name. The court in Minor stated what this name was – “These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.”

    Minor v Happersett is clear to anyone who can read English and has passable reading comprehension skills. Obviously, Judge Malihi lacks these basic skills.

  2. Sowieso Dumm
    February 4th, 2012 @ 3:03 pm

    > The court in Minor stated what this name was – “These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.”

    Still it was dicta. Since Minor didn’t need to be a natural born citizen, just a citizen.

    > So Mahili “considering” that he was born in Hawaii is unfounded by anything within the hearing

    You forgot the other two lawyers submitted Obama’s BC into evidence. That was a big mistake; this basically allowed Malihi (sp!) to accept that as true.

  3. orly taitz
    February 4th, 2012 @ 5:51 pm

    no, our cases were completely separate. Malihi cannot presume in my case, what was stipulated in other cases

  4. steve
    February 4th, 2012 @ 7:16 pm

    if you want the perfect Court decision to counter Georgia court decision get 1:08-cv-99
    from United States district court of New Hamshire for John McCain.

  5. Andy
    February 5th, 2012 @ 5:42 am

    If they were completely separate cases, why did they have the same docket number?

Leave a Reply