OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

Opposition to Motion to Quash Subpoena

Posted on | January 19, 2012 | 7 Comments

Opposition to Motion to Quash Subpoena

Category:

Comments

7 Responses to “Opposition to Motion to Quash Subpoena”

  1. Journeyman
    January 19th, 2012 @ 8:28 pm

    Orly,

    I thought that Minor v. Happersett was at the core of your arguments? You didn’t mention it in the motion to quash. You’ve fallen back on jus soli. Now all Obama has to do is produce a BC and he’ll win!! Please make sure that that judge knows about the 2-parent NBC argument!!

  2. orly taitz
    January 19th, 2012 @ 8:51 pm

    it is not relevant for motion to quash the subpoena. For Minor you do not need any documents. That is the reason why Hattfield and Irion do not subpoena anything. Minor argument is theoretical, either the jude accepts it or not

  3. Kingskid
    January 19th, 2012 @ 8:58 pm

    I think you did a really good job on that opposition to motion to quash subpoena, Orly! I pray that all this fraud and deception will be exposed once and for all. Thanks for all you’ve done and continue to do.

  4. kenny1801
    January 20th, 2012 @ 3:12 am

    Wow. Ms. Taitz..I just cannot express the admiration I have for you and all who go after the FRAUD in CHIEF!!..If I wasn’t un-employed, I would GLADLY donate to your cause…God Bless America and GOD Bless YOU!!!

  5. dotherightthing
    January 20th, 2012 @ 6:18 am

    I don’t understand a lot of the language in these filings so I’ll just ask. When Loretta Fuddy failed to product the REAL bc, and secured her attorney, I see there have been numerous back and forth motions filed. Is this case AND the Georgia case scheduled for the same day?
    Is Ms. Fuddy going to be compelled to open the vault and reveal the “half handwritten/half typed” ORIGINAL birth certificate?

  6. The Truth
    January 20th, 2012 @ 7:43 am

    Outstanding work Dr. Taitz!
    Your arguement is well written, organized, and thought out, unlike the Liar In Chief’s.

  7. Tom Lawson
    January 20th, 2012 @ 9:56 am

    Orly:
    Hope you enjoy your new laptop. Glad to contribute to it and hope to support you $$$ as able.
    Also, a VIP ? for you.
    What options does Obama/his attorneys have if they can’t quash and what are the ‘costs’ to him to do so, i.e., if he doesn’t show up (which he never will) can he just blow you off (a la HI DOH) and not be affected at all?
    Or, can he delay again via appeals, forever?
    Just how ‘caught’ is this usurper and, can this ‘snake’ wiggle free once again or, does ‘St. Orly the Dragon Slayter’ finally have her foot on the neck of this serpent’?

Leave a Reply