the other side is playing dirty
Posted on | January 17, 2012 | 13 Comments
I found out that the other side has started a campaign of defaming not only me, but also my witnesses, as well as contacting witnesses and trying to persuade them not to show up at trial. A known FBI informant, who was caught by a judge lying in another case, sent a defamatory letter to judge Malihi. Bottom line, the same usual dirt and scum, that we saw before. Please, stay strong, do not pay any attention to thugs, we will win at the end, criminals will go to prison.
Comments
13 Responses to “the other side is playing dirty”
Leave a Reply












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

January 17th, 2012 @ 6:47 am
That’s Obama for you, runs the nation just like his precious corrupt Chicago. Keep fighting the fight Orly. You’re an inspiration.
January 17th, 2012 @ 7:28 am
I do hope and pray the Thugs working for Obama/Soetoro do not Intimidate Judge Malihi to change his view on this case.
January 17th, 2012 @ 7:35 am
You knew that O-philes would play dirty. It’s the supposed allies stabbing you in the back that’s shocking.
January 17th, 2012 @ 8:39 am
It is time to go away….you just do get it.
we don’t believe you or your lying scum-bag birther’s. You are a racist bitter old women with to much time on your hands….what you need is hobby or may be your husband need to give you more attendance…what ever the case may be….
January 17th, 2012 @ 9:07 am
Orly, you know you have them by the short hairs when they start playing silly games like this. I believe what they will do is piss off the judge.
As for dghankins. There are no words to express my contempt and disgust for you. Go away, punk!
January 17th, 2012 @ 9:37 am
Is English your second language, dghankins? Your redaction sucks hardcore.
January 17th, 2012 @ 9:45 am
@dghankins :
Ignorant is as ignorant does . Crawl back to your hole .
January 17th, 2012 @ 10:46 am
Where did you get this information about the FBI informant?
January 17th, 2012 @ 11:53 am
“Where did you get this information about the FBI informant?” She pulled it out of her fat arse!
January 17th, 2012 @ 12:00 pm
If Obama presents a certified COLB at the Hearing, then you can contravene the prima facie evidence by showing Obama a printout of the OLFBC and asking him why the signatures of the witnesses on the OLFBC have withdrawn their attestation.
Point out to the Judge there is a “date filed” on the COLB and a “date accepted” on the OLFBC because the witnesses on the OLFBC have withdrawn. An explanation is warranted.
What event triggered the change from “date accepted” to “date filed”?
January 17th, 2012 @ 12:55 pm
Liberals have no genuine morals or scruples. To a liberal the “ends” justifies the “means”. They believe that to achieve their goals anything is permissible. This all goes back to their denial of absolute right and wrong. They do not really believe that God has set down rules of behavior to be followed or you will suffer the consequence of God’s judgement. They think Man is, and invented God. This explains why liberals think the Constitution is just a bunch of suggestions to be interpreted as they feel the moment dictates. It also explains why it is a bad idea to try to negotiate or compromise with liberals, for like the Muslims and communists, they will make and break agreements if they think it will help them achieve their long term goals.
This is the war that is raging now. Between the forces of darkness and light. I hope now you can see a bit more clearly.
January 17th, 2012 @ 6:17 pm
@dogakin I mean dghankins, you know how there is useful idiot well you are useless idiot!!
Orly if they had the evidence they wouldn’t have wasted any time in providing them and putting the matter to rest. The thing is they know they DON’T have any REAL birth certificate and that they have been aiding and abetting. They are running scared. You go Orly!!!
January 18th, 2012 @ 3:48 am
> why the signatures of the witnesses on the OLFBC have withdrawn their attestation
Huh? What kind of theory is that? Who has “withdrawn” anything, and why, and how do you prove that?
> there is a “date filed” on the COLB and a “date accepted” on the OLFBC because the witnesses on the OLFBC have withdrawn
So the Nordyke birth witnesses have withdrawn, too? Because their COLB and LFBC say exactly the same.