from a supporter Mark
Posted on | October 14, 2011 | 5 Comments
| Mark Smith |
Submitted on 2011/10/13 at 5:15pm
Just like the police- it doesn’t matter if Orly fails 10 times in a row trying to catch a fraudster- like our natural born liar- The crook only has to make one mistake in order to get caught. Think about this: not one birther has been arrested for claiming that Barack Obama has been using fraudulent identity documents- not one person. If they are all liars, surely the DOJ would put one in handcuffs for lying to Federal agencies- it’s a Title 18 offense to lie to any Federal official or Judge .(this is the law Martha Stewart broke and went to jail for) However, if any birther gets arrested they would have absolute legal standing to subpoena the Hawaii Dept of Vital Records to have Obama’s BC examined and the Obama original Connecticut SSN application released by the SSA. For this reason alone, it is extremely likely that these shielded records will prove Obama has been untruthful with to the American public. |
Summary of the hearing and actually fair and balanced reporting on FOX HI –KHON 2 at 5 and 6pm evening news, FOX showed the judge totally biased and dumb 20 # |
Comments
5 Responses to “from a supporter Mark”
Leave a Reply












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

October 14th, 2011 @ 7:49 am
To Mark,
you stated:
“However, if any birther gets arrested they would have absolute legal standing to subpoena the Hawaii Dept of Vital Records to have Obama’s BC examined and the Obama original Connecticut SSN application released by the SSA.”
What law states that? So, if a person is caught burglarizing a home, the criminal has a right to have the home searched for illegal activity, despite no evidence?
So Fitzpatrick can subpoena the grand jury records, since he was arrested?
Where in America can a person jailed for stalking make the person stalked prove their innocence?
October 14th, 2011 @ 8:17 am
No one can be arrested for “claiming” that, in his/her opinion, someone has committed an illegal act.SCOTUS has ruled, time and time again, that there is no wrong opinion. The president could, on the other hand, sue in civil court for libel or slander. Not very likely.
October 14th, 2011 @ 8:19 am
go ahead, Mr. Obama, sue me for libel, you’ll have to grant access to your original papers to prove your case, be my guest, sue me
October 14th, 2011 @ 8:28 am
Dr. Taitz,
That’s why he won’t sue…
October 14th, 2011 @ 5:06 pm
Actually,
He won’t sue because he doesn’t care. You are a medium fish in a small pond. I would worry about some of the people who you claim are corrupt.