Early returns: Bachmann is winning the IA straw poll, Ron Paul is second
Posted on | August 13, 2011 | 23 Comments
Mark Rudd |
Submitted on 2011/08/13 at 11:46am
You almost knew they were going to stonewall you in HI. But you fought on anyway! Wow! Orly as Bachmann’s Secretary of State! That would be unprecedented! I think you should do it. |
Clinton appointee in the 11th Circuit decides against Obamacare, let’s hope that Clinton appointees decide in my favor in the 9th circuit on the forged BC |
Category: Uncategorized
Comments
23 Responses to “Early returns: Bachmann is winning the IA straw poll, Ron Paul is second”
Leave a Reply
August 13th, 2011 @ 5:28 pm
If she knows you then she knows Obama is illegal. Lets see if she has the courage to be president. They all said they had to shut Obama down in the debate. Well, she has the power to do it tomorrow.
August 13th, 2011 @ 5:34 pm
This is great news! Both Bachman and Ron Paul are anti Federal Reserve. Either one of these would make a great candidate and a great president.
August 13th, 2011 @ 6:07 pm
Bachmann Yes Paul No. Bachmann stands 100% behind Israel. Paul is bad on foreign policy. He said we should not worry about Iran getting a Nuke. The guy must be drinking Arab juice. Good work Orly. You rock!
August 13th, 2011 @ 7:28 pm
Don’t get too excited. These straw polls are just media-driven ratings nonsense. Iowa is only a State with 3,000,000 people; that’s it! To put this in perspective, metro Atlanta, GA, has a population of 5,000,000. California has a population of around 37,000,000. NYC is around 19-20,000,000. Bachmann is also a native Iowan. Pawlenty came in third, and we all know he’s a damn joke.
August 13th, 2011 @ 9:17 pm
Great news, Orly. Can you get her to challenge Obama’s eligibility? She has great courage, so please convince her.
August 13th, 2011 @ 10:05 pm
If Bachmann knows that Obama is not eligible to be POTUS and not say anything about it, then doesn’t that make her complicit also? In other words, she is no different than the other liberals. So,having said that, I do not trust her, and I would not vote for her either.
August 13th, 2011 @ 10:09 pm
Be careful of who you associate with Orly, be very careful. Some people will do whatever it takes just to get the votes. Be it sincere or not.
August 14th, 2011 @ 2:53 am
Bachmann accepted the forged COLB as proof that bo is eligible. She has done nothing to look into the matter.
August 14th, 2011 @ 5:37 am
All I can know is : You are known by the company you keep. I think Michelle Bachman is great. Has more brain and guts than anyone in the House and Senate (including the president). She would be a great president, but she has one stumbling block: She’s a woman and to top it off a “Tea Party” member. Sadly, other countries have no problems letting a woman lead but the US is far behind. I think she should have Boehner’s position but that was prevented from happening as the left knew she would not be paid off. To get to my point, she has an uphill battle. It seems it would be suicide to her career to be photographed with Orly (sorry Orly, we love you!) I just think it speaks volumes on the fact that Michelle knows it will only be a matter of time……
August 14th, 2011 @ 6:15 am
Bachmann was an IRS Attorney as well. She is not on our side. Why is she not questioning all of the documentation that shows Obama to be a fraud?
She took the oath to support the Constitution, so why is she refusing to do so?
Beware of false politicians who come to you with promises of hope and change, but inwardly are filled with lies and deceptions, you shall no them by their deeds…..or lack thereof.
August 14th, 2011 @ 6:38 am
Any candidate who will not bring up Obama’s forged bc does not deserve a single vote.If you won’t address the number one problem in this country how can you be trusted.
August 14th, 2011 @ 8:24 am
I wholeheartedly agree with ‘speedy’ and ‘right turn’.
Anyone who was a member of Congress in 2008, and/or has been a member of Congress since 2010, who hasn’t done anything about Obama’s lack of eligibility and fraudulent Social Security Number and Selective Service Registration doesn’t deserve a single vote.
PALIN – BOLTON
August 14th, 2011 @ 10:42 am
I agree that those that don’t acknowledge his ineligibility should not be supported. But I don’t see anyone, tea party, Republican or otherwise acknowledging this. Actually I support Palin more than Bachman but has she ever been questioned on this and if so, what did she say? (I know she did not have a place in the House of Reps or Senate where this could be pushed). And Trump, he brings it up but when things aren’t going his way he leaves. Is there is any politician that has voiced his or her doubt. With all the illegal actions by this Administration I cannot believe he wouldn’t assume a false social security and go to all the trouble of blocking his personal records. Even Fox isn’t pushing it like they could.
August 15th, 2011 @ 12:20 am
Several people commenting here have made, IMO, VERY intelligent, positive criticisms that Dr. Taitz will, I hope, bear in mind. I distinctly recall — several months ago, that a reporter asked Baumann why she showed no interest in the QUALIFICATIONS FOR eligibility of aka Obama, and HER REPLY was, “I’m NOT interested in that, I have MUCH MORE important issues that I have to address to support my constituents.” OR WORDS to THAT EFFECT.
SHE, and EVERY other member of Congress, the Judiciary and all levels of the Military are ALL knowledgeable and have shown NO Concern that aka’s father was NOT AN AMERICAN CITIZEN — thus making him ineligible. And they ALL have sworn Oaths of Office to pledge allegiance to the Constitution and the USA!
Bachmann has spent many thousands of dollars and has stumped all over and sounded of in the debates TRYING TO CONVINCE US THAT QUALIFICATIONS MATTER AND she is best suited.
Can there be any greater hypocrisy?
Not ONE REPUBLICAN in the last primary season of ’07 & ’08 had the courage to say that aka Obama was NOT eligible and here we are, 3+1/2 years later and we are able to witness the destruction that the Marxists in the White House are doing, and still NOT ONE of them are willing — or has the courage to state the obvious — that we have an unqualified (possibly an illegal alien), as our president
Remember folks. Choosing the lesser of two evils — is still to be choosing EVIL.
Also, Dr. Taitz, be extremely cautious that you do not get “snowed under” by the attraction of celebrity status. You ARE doing a fantastic job — no other lawyer is any where near you in bringing aka Obama to court.
It’s easy for us arm-chair quarterbacks to call the plays and with 20:20 hindsight, to critique your errors … as few as they actually are. I DO believe that most of those who offer suggestions are doing so in a loving, supportive way and are NOT, in any way putting you down for anything that they may deem “ill advised”.
One, last thought. Please, do NOT plead for ANY kind of “support” from anyone who has ANY relationship to, or with, the United Nations.
Your appeal to the International Court of Justice (I think it’s called), implies that you do not think OUR Constitution has the ability to function and provide the basis as our FUNDAMENTAL LAW of the land. IMO, OUR Constitution IS SUPREME … there is nothing higher than it but our Divine Creator from which all humans derive their civil rights. To appeal to the UN or any international court is exactly what the globalists want — to end the sovereignty of our Nation.
August 15th, 2011 @ 10:21 pm
Bachman is a RINO. Ron Paul 2012!
August 16th, 2011 @ 4:13 am
I am really concerned about Paul’s statements, that Iran should have nuclear weapons. I think, he is correct on need for fiscal accountability, but his foreign policy views frighten me.
August 16th, 2011 @ 11:19 am
“I am really concerned about Paul’s statements, that Iran should have nuclear weapons. I think, he is correct on need for fiscal accountability, but his foreign policy views frighten me..”
……………
Anyone who does NOT see the reality of Dr. Paul’s comments, freightens ME! 😉
August 16th, 2011 @ 11:22 am
Points to Ponder:
…China, Russia and a dozen other countries have nukes, that should not be a concern as well?
…Also, Bachmann won( by) less than one %.
How many of those votes were ”bought”?
…Lastly, you have done a very good job fighting this Obomination issue with out the help of those who back Obo and their ilk.
A fighter does better going into battle lighter and not ”obligated” to heavy weights but fighting like one.
Good legal hunting
I hope we all can share in the historical and Constitutional price.
Best Regards
F.A. Leonetti
August 16th, 2011 @ 1:08 pm
Dr. Taitz,
Even if Iran were to acquire a nuke weapon, Israel has hundreds and can well defend itself against any possible threat Iran may pose.
I think Dr. Ron Paul is the only one who can save us from this financial crisis and restore our Republic. And I support him and will be voting for him no matter what.
That said, I am still disappointed with the fact that he is not challenging Obama’s legitimacy either. I have a real hard time with that, but his track record shows he always votes on the side of the U.S. Constitution and his integrity speaks for itself.
August 16th, 2011 @ 1:45 pm
you don’t understand
one dirty bomb smugled from Iran to the US can kill you, your whole family and your whole city
You can’t play with these things. I believe Ron Paul can be a great member of the cabinet, possibly secretary of treasury, but each and every member of the military I talked to, believes that his stand on the National security is dangerous, which makes him a wrong choice for president
August 16th, 2011 @ 3:16 pm
Whoever is voting for Ron Paul, has never finished high school, doesn’t know anything about economics or how the world works. A nuclear Iran is the worst nightmare this country could ever have. Of course Ron Paul’s followers are idiots who don’t know better. They can’t chew gum and walk at the same time.
Vote for Bachmann not Paul. Ron Paul belongs in the crazy house. Under Ron Paul we’ll last what a box of donuts last at any police station. We’ll be blown to hell. The presidency can’t be held by a coward in chief sorry.
August 16th, 2011 @ 3:22 pm
no reason to call Ron Paul names. He is knowledgeable about fiscal accountability, but I prefer someone stronger on national security
December 31st, 2011 @ 2:34 pm
… [Trackback]…
[…] Read More here: orlytaitzesq.com/?p=24625 […]…