4 Responses to “This “Associated Press” article was republished in multiple news papers around the world”

1. Maulder
   May 2nd, 2011 @ 9:43 pm

   Orly:…here’s what Aaron Klein wrote in WND about the eligibility issue:…

   Authors: Even Hawaii birth won’t make Obama eligible
   President still has major legal issues following release of ‘birth certificate’
   Posted: April 27, 2011
   12:12 pm Eastern

2. Pv
   May 2nd, 2011 @ 10:55 pm

   Interesting…why would it matter when to file, before, during or after a crime was commited?

3. Pixel Patriot
   May 3rd, 2011 @ 3:06 am

   Orly,

   Great job. We’re all very proud of you. However, one note…the AP sourced article in the azdailysun.com you link to gets hijacked and claims one only need to be a citizen to be president. There is a big distinction between that and a “natural born Citizen”

   Go here for proof:
   http://www.pixelpatriot.blogspot.com

   video here:
   https://vimeo.com/22533554

   At the time of their writing the Constitution in 1787, the founders were not so quick to forget the bloody revolution this nation endured so as to sever the bonds of a tyrannical government that they would not institute a safeguard to prevent a subject of England from once again enslaving them. It is with great foresight that the Framers affixed a three-tiered security measure to thwart such an occurrence. They looked to Vattel’s “The Law of Nations” when they set forth the limitations reserved for the sole position of the leader of the nation and commander in chief of the military forces. In Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution, only a “natural born Citizen” is eligible to be President of the United States:

   “No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”

   This precaution precluded dual allegiance. It is not a discretionary right.

   John Jay, one of the Founding Fathers of the United States, President of the Continental Congress from 1778 to 1779 and, from 1789 to 1795, the first Chief Justice of the United States so poignantly acknowledges the singular point which lies at the heart of this issue in his letter to George Washington, the presiding officer of the Constitutional Convention on July 25, 1787.

   Jay wrote:
   “Permit me to hint whether it would not be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government, and to declare expressly that the Command in Chief of the American army shall not be given to nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen.“

   Godspeed,
   Pixel Patriot

4. questions
   May 3rd, 2011 @ 6:05 am

   It’s interesting that the Administration happened to have the world shattering story of Osama hours before the hearing.

   Remember, what happened did not change this Administration’s agenda

Leave a Reply