14 Responses to “please, write to Rupert Murdock and Roger Ailes, pres of FOX and presidents of other networks and demand to fire talk show hosts, who are complicit in Obama’s Social Security fraud and elections fraud and do not report true information”

1. Chum Lee
   April 1st, 2011 @ 5:43 am

   So journalists and TV personalities should be fired, because they do not agree with you? Perhaps you should be banned (I am joking – i believe in freedom), because I think the information you spread is largely false, or baseless without being authenticated or otherwise corroborated. Why don’t you set up your own network and run your own news programs?

   That is how freedom works. Don’t like Fox or MSNBC, start your own network.

2. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
   April 1st, 2011 @ 10:25 am

   not ones that disagree with me, should be fired, but ones that defraud the nation should be fired.
   In regards to my network, do you want to invest in it?

3. turnright
   April 1st, 2011 @ 11:08 am

   Chum, you mention being big on freedom. As concerns President Opaque, are you for the kind of freedom that demands that the government be the single payer of the masses’ health claims… a scheme that if carried to logical end… and resuling in rationing… will cause our ladies to have to bring in used ‘incontinence pads’ to be weighed and otherwise tested in order prove they are incontinent enough to receive a few new government pads? England has that freedom.

   Perhaps you are for the kind of freedom where some black natzis can stand at poling place entrances wih billy clubs and uniforms and a federal justice department as much as says it’s okay.

   And perhaps you are for the freedom of Chrysler dealers to close their doors because the govamint has tooken over the company and forced many of these individual entrepreneurs into receivership… but not some chosen few… who received the Oposter’s blessing to stay in business since they contributed big time to Democrats.

   And we should every one enjoy the freedom to opt out of Obuggar care, just like the companies and groups that have received compliance waivers. What is it, a hundred… two hundred? The inverse of transparency, this jackboot Administration is corruption’s best attempt yet at a legalized bribe station.

   And if freedom is virtuous, Obama can start earning points by giving back the 2,000,000,000 dollars he has secreted away in offshore accounts from the Ed Falcone funds and other payoffs.

4. Coastal Eddie
   April 1st, 2011 @ 11:13 am

   The source of the problem is not FooxUp Newz, as I have mentioned before. The parent company is NewsCorp.,
   Rupert Murdoch is the head, the number 2 man [how appropriate] is the radical Prince Walid of Saudi Arabia.
   All information on that network must pass through his filters.

5. chum lee
   April 1st, 2011 @ 5:00 pm

   Not gonna invest. My point is that you combat speech you don’t like with speech, and not with baseless accusations of fraud.

6. Bart Piscitello
   April 2nd, 2011 @ 10:40 am

   It does’nt a rocket scientist to read simple
   SS application and the numbers written upon them.
   The numbers that obama used are the SAME ones designated to other people; outright identity fraud.
   What part of the heavy equation is not understood?? the numbers or the name.

   Many people can read, but few understand; and those who do understand, choose to ignore the truth.

   I would suggest to Mr. Chum Lee; don’t be a Chump and do invest in Dr. Taitz’ network.

   The truth is out there; obama is a Kenyan muslim. 80% of the country suspects or knows it
   Not eligible under any circumstance.
   They had to widen the doors on the WH to accomodate obama’s ear widths

7. Daniel Boone
   April 2nd, 2011 @ 10:20 pm

   Chum:…baseless? Do you not continue to hear how O’Reilly can’t tell the truth about most anything involving Obama, to the American people!

   He’s nothing but a puppet! He’s told what to say…and he already “backed down” from Orly a year or so ago, when she wanted to have him answer questions about treason!!! And he had to mention that he was “hiding under his desk,” cause he couldn’t respond to her honesty!!!!

   Why do you just like to be “critical” as opposed to posting something more worthwhile? It’s the same, old boring blah with you! You’re just an “attack SMERF” that can’t take the time to be helpful, rather than falling back into the same worn out post!!!

   How unproductive you are!

   Patriot…

8. Ed
   April 3rd, 2011 @ 3:06 am

   ” My point is that you combat speech you don’t like with speech, and not with baseless accusations of fraud.”
   Isn’t that the “Pot calling the Kettlr Black” …
   Seems when ever the Liberal gets the same thing thrown back in their faces they resort to the old theme that those who disagree with them are combating speech that we don’t like with speech, and using baselesss accusations…baseless by what (whose) standards?? Yours??So by your own definition its OK for them (you) but not anyone else, especially if we disagree with them (you)…GROW UP you’re acting like a spoiled brat Chum Lee…
   Give me a break you couldn’t see the forest because of the trees if you had too and with all the evidence you still are blind…
   So by your own definition its OK for them (you) but not anyone else, especially if we disagree with them (you)…GROW UP you’re acting like a spoiled brat Chum Lee…

9. Exasperated
   April 3rd, 2011 @ 5:06 am

   Should these talk shows hosts also be prosecuted for treason?

10. Ro
    April 3rd, 2011 @ 8:06 am

    Chum Lee. Get real. the whole g-d world knows Obama is a fraud. He is not respected and possibly is even being blackmailed to the detrement of National Security for this country. He is unqualified, inept and is committing treason and he knows he is illegal. did you see his speech last Monday night. He was so drugged up he couldn’t keep his eyes open.
    Do your homework. You and thousands others are in denial. Soon you will see the truth. You must learn to read first though.

11. Per Son
    April 4th, 2011 @ 6:51 am

    You guys are funny. I have never insulted Orly – ever. Unless disagreement is an insult.

    I do not have time to deal with the mumbo jumbo much of you all are saying. You know the stuff about unsubstantiated and proven social security stuff, but I’ll try a little:

    Yes, I have yet to see any authenticated proof that there was any social security shenanigans.

    No proof Obama is a Muslim, and if he is, so what. I wouldn’t care if he was Catholic, Baptist, Jewish, Shinto, etc. It is not relevant to the task of running this country – that is, unless you hate the Constitution and wish to apply a religious test.

    One of you even said the health insurance law calls for a single payer – totally wrong. Single-payer is a specific form of health care, and it is not in the law. Even the staunchest opponents of the law would agree to that.

    Orly has a choice when she posts my comments – sometimes she posts them, sometimes she does not. My comments are perfectly mature – I just see that some of you just like spinning around the axle though.

    But some of you perhaps are correct. How else do I have a discussion when everyday on this site I learn new things from the comments (e.g. Obama’s secret 2 billion dollars in funds off shore). Wow that is pretty wild.

    I’ll close by pointing out that until I see you all ask the same “background questions” of all presidential candidates. I have yet to see any other candidate’s birth certificate since I began following politics in the mid-1980s (the McCain one was called a fake by the McCain camp so don’t offer that as an example).

12. John
    April 4th, 2011 @ 1:41 pm

    Orly, the only reason little Rupert would ever fire a talking head is money. As long as these clowns bring in the ad revenue, Murdoch will keep them in his employ.

13. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    April 4th, 2011 @ 4:09 pm

    for once I agree with you, however he is facing serious litigation and a huge judgment, if his employees continue committing journalistic malpractice, continue defraudung the public and he knows about it and does nothing. At the end of the day the ossibility of judgment against him will outweigh the profit

Leave a Reply