Why did Harvard law review seal Obama’s articles?
Posted on | June 1, 2009 | 3 Comments
s |
Submitted on 2009/06/01 at 9:37am
Yes, I have asked the same questions. Also, if the Harvard Law review is a publication meaning available to the public, the copies that Harvard has under seal should be made public via subpeona. They have no business in sealing clearly public documents. You can even go online and order past issues. |
Comments
3 Responses to “Why did Harvard law review seal Obama’s articles?”












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

June 1st, 2009 @ 7:33 pm
more and more people are seeing Dr. Taitz’ messages and supporting her each day.
This movement is taking off!!!
I think we should lobby for Dr. Taitz to be placed on The Supreme Court. Her story is more compelling, her legal skills are self-evident, her courage is outstanding, and then Justice Scalia will have his 4th vote!
This can happen if we work together and if the GOP and some Democrats show half Dr. Taitz’ courage!!
This fight is succeeding!!!!
June 3rd, 2009 @ 3:58 am
If those articles are anything like the alleged article I read that was written by Barry from Columbia, they were most likely sealed because they were an embarrassment to Harvard.
Grammer, spelling, sentences, etc. atrocious.