Investigation on whether some Obama supporters-attorneys engaged in obstruction of justice, fraud, aiding and abetting fraud and treason in order to schield Obama and viciously attack me and other civil rights attorneys, who were pursuing Obama’s social security fraud and elections fraud?
Posted on | January 13, 2011 | 15 Comments
Exclusive investigation: frantic effort to stop questions on Obama eligibility
- January 13th, 2011 3:50 pm ET
Do you like this story?
Private investigators have revealed to Conservative Examiner the details of an investigation into the frantic effort by Obama operatives to stop all questions concerning the Constitutional issue of Presidential eligibility.
The ongoing investigation has been a work-in-progress for several months, and the sources state that there is much more information to come.
Central to the investigation is the inability of concerned citizens to discover whether or not Barack Obama’s father was a British subject at the time of Obama’s birth in Hawaii. Regardless of whether or not Obama was born in the states, if his father were a British subject at the time of the birth, the Constitution indicates he would not meet the eligibility requirement that he be a ‘natural-born citizen.’
The Framers of the Constitution stipulated that potential Presidents be solely loyal to the United States and its Constitution, and thus, a person born to a parent who was a British subject, even if the other parent were an American citizen, would be disqualified from serving.
‘Natural-born citizen’ is a specific term denoting a specific concept. It is much more than simply being born in the U.S. The concept refers to a person whose parents were U.S. citizens at the time of the birth.
The Framers had just fought a bloody and costly war to secure independence. They did not want any possibility that a potential President could have divided loyalties between the new fledgling Republic and the British empire from which they had declared themselves independent.
Yet, so far Barack Obama, his lawyers, the Democratic Party, and Leftwing organizations have frantically attempted to prevent anyone from discovering whether or not Obama’s father was a British subject.
Obama apologists have claimed that there has been no effort at all to thwart attempts to make such a discovery. But Conservative Examiner can now reveal that an entire network of Obama operatives have done exactly that and have used unseemly tactics to smear those who even raise the questions concerning Presidential eligibility.
Conservative Examiner can now reveal that 2 websites have been devoted to the singular purpose of maligning, disparaging, and threatening conservatives who wish to discover the truth about Obama’s background. Those sites are Politijab and Fogbow. The main players behind the scheme are those with the screen names of ‘Foggy,’ ‘Realist,’ and ‘Justin.’
Fogbow, by the way, is one of the main sources of libelous remarks about conservatives in the aftermath of the Tucson massacre. The site disparages conservatives on a continual basis, accusing them of making ‘death threats’ which led to the shootings, although there is not a shred of evidence linking Loughner to the Tea Party, Sarah Palin, Rush Limbaugh, or ANY conservative.
Investigators have also received a copy of the entire membership lists of the groups involved and have discovered that a team of top Democratic attorneys have been working in tandem with the groups to attempt to shut down all talk about the issue of Presidential eligibility as it relates to Barack Obama.
The question is, why? If it is true that Obama has nothing to hide and that conservatives are ‘nuts’ for raising the question, then why has this group been formed that is solely dedicated to squelching questions about eligibility? And why would they have the assistance and backing of an entire team of Democratic Party lawyers?
Here are some excerpts from the groups, revealing the intent and tactics utilized by Politijab and Fogbow:
From Justin: ‘I was bashing birthers on an obsessively daily basis earlier than anyone else here. And believe me, I was exceedingly good at it. I reveled in it. It was a blast. Many of you will never know the extent to which I supported the cause against the birthers, and I’m okay with that. The reasons I did it were that I believed in the President’s ability affect real change, to influence this nation in a positive direction…through his agenda.
‘…what does a site centered around an issue that was resolved from the beginning (Obama’s heritage) do with itself when even that issue no longer matters, because Obama is no longer in office? It could be two years from now…’
The writer goes further to name his targets and, sometimes erroneously, refers to them as ‘birthers’ when in actuality many of them are not convinced of anything until somebody, somewhere produces proof for all to see concerning Obama’s eligibility. To raise questions about the hidden nature of the information is not the same as declaring Obama to be ineligible without any proof.
Conservative Examiner is in possession of the complete membership list of this group. Investigators, including attorneys, are continuing their efforts to discover the full names of the persons behind the screen names.
Developing…
Be sure to catch my blog at The Liberty Sphere.
Subscribe by clicking the subscribe box beside my picture at the top of the page. An email will be sent to your inbox each time a new article is published
Continue reading on Examiner.com: Exclusive investigation: frantic effort to stop questions on Obama eligibility – National Conservative | Examiner.com https://www.examiner.com/conservative-in-national/exclusive-investigation-frantic-effort-to-stop-questions-on-obama-eligibility#ixzz1Ay021DeS
Comments
15 Responses to “Investigation on whether some Obama supporters-attorneys engaged in obstruction of justice, fraud, aiding and abetting fraud and treason in order to schield Obama and viciously attack me and other civil rights attorneys, who were pursuing Obama’s social security fraud and elections fraud?”
Leave a Reply
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
January 13th, 2011 @ 5:36 pm
Orly – I’m worried about Andy. Does he have any medical conditions that you’re aware of. Something seems to be out of proportion in his appearance. Maybe it is just his photo?
Regards,
Macrocephaly
January 13th, 2011 @ 6:11 pm
Orly, I’m confused. I thought you were trying to enlist those of us Fogbow/Politijab attorneys who attended the hearing in Judge Robreno’s courtroom — you needed our affidavits. But then you post this. You want us to come forward, but then you bash us. Which is it? You want testimony from FG/PJ or not?
January 13th, 2011 @ 7:48 pm
Hey Politiblabber, is that a little sweat on your brow I see?
January 13th, 2011 @ 8:51 pm
Politijobber, in the spirit of the new civil ay of conduct I will say to you thusly: Do NOT MESS with Dr Orly. She will NEVER disappoint you!!!
Dr Orly, Ignore those Obots
I Know you gave them a chance for proper discourse at their Obot lair. I saw what they did. If they say up, it’s down, if they say left, is most likely right. You could spend a life learning teh reindeer games they play.
Don’t play with them, Dr Orly!!!
January 13th, 2011 @ 9:56 pm
Dang Orly, are ya just jonesing for some libel?
January 14th, 2011 @ 12:18 am
I am rikker. I am a Fogbow denizen and a Politijabber. I am fully immersed in the culture of anti-birtherism in both of those dens of iniquity, but recently I have seen the light.
So let me go on record right now, in the name of hope, peace, civility, and sanity. Have Mr. Martin contact me at the email above and I will blow the lid off the biggest cover up in recent history.
Or, in the alternative, YOU Orly can meet me in the Fogbow chatroom and I will confess before the entire congregation. I’ll tell about the steps we took to hinder your investigations at the request of a secretive group called The Regulators of the Black Hand, or C.O.O.N for short.
There. My conscience is clear. Let the Leftist do what they must.
January 14th, 2011 @ 1:19 am
I heard Justin eats paste.
January 14th, 2011 @ 3:43 am
REMOVE THE BRIT-NOT LEGIT
January 14th, 2011 @ 5:32 am
Yeah, if ya all get a chance, go on over to the Fogbow forum and try to have a different view than them. See how butthurt they get and do everything they can to censor you. First they will give you your own thread hidden deep where no one can find it and then when it explodes and takes over the forum, they wine and cry and say you are banned.
WAH WAH WAH
Fogblow sucks!
January 14th, 2011 @ 5:47 am
A couple of questions. Which Civil Rights attorneys have been attacked? Also, how have they engaged in obstruction of justice?
Please answer as there are many people interested in knowing.
Best,
Johnny
January 14th, 2011 @ 9:09 am
“The Framers of the Constitution stipulated that potential Presidents be solely loyal to the United States and its Constitution, and thus, a person born to a parent who was a British subject, even if the other parent were an American citizen, would be disqualified from serving.”
This is absolutely false. The Framers were all born British subjects – none of them would have been eligble to serve if this were true, but it clearly is not.
January 14th, 2011 @ 9:12 am
I am glad to finally see another news source post on this fraudulent behavior that we all new about. There is something inherently wrong and evil about a “leader” that uses a national tragedy such as Tuscon, as a springboard for a new political campaign. This is someone who is incapable of “leading” and must resort to fraud and deceit instead to achieve any political position. The only people Obama is fooling, are his own followers.
History will not be kind to Obama or his supporters. Evil can not pretend to be good and truthful, because it is an impossibility against the laws of God and nature. We the People will win this because we depend on God only.
Remember that, stay safe & God Bless.
January 14th, 2011 @ 1:21 pm
John, please tell me you’re playing dumb. Please. I know you and your cadre wouldn’t know the Constitution if it were pasted on your forehead. But it’s not hard to pick up a copy and read Article 2 Section 1 where the founding fathers gave themselves an escape clause from the natural born citizen requirement: “…or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution,” Most of them were born jus soli but none were born jus sanguinis, so they needed to exempt their generation from the NBC requirement.
January 14th, 2011 @ 8:50 pm
Hey, Porker. No sweat. Just an affidavit that Orly is coveting. I was there, in the courtroom in Philly, and watched the hearing. Orly needs me, she needs what I could testify to. But she prefers to call me names, so I’ll just hold onto that very important evidence that she really, really, really wants.
January 14th, 2011 @ 9:34 pm
Porky, if you could read you’d know that I didn’t say otherwise. The “at the time of adoption” clause is an illustration of the clear falsehood that I quoted from the body of the article. Try to stay focused, Porky!