Here we go! Act one: 14 states will unveil a bill, which will inerpret 14th amendment, as relating to children of citizens only. No more U.S. citizenship for children of illegal immigrants. Children will follow the status of their parents. Child of a tourist, is a tourist, child of an illegal is an illegal, even if born on U.S. soil. States have to protect themselves or go bankrupt. States are fighting back against the globalist cartel, which is robbing this nation blind
Posted on | December 31, 2010 | 6 Comments
This first bill will deal with the citizenship in general, not presidency. More bills to follow. Please, get of the couch and lobby hard your legislature and US Congress to extend this bill to all 50 states and to add the Vattel “Natural born status definition for eligibility to Presidency and vice-presidency.
It is very important to tie this incoming bill with the eligibility for presidency and vice presidency. If one is born in U.S., both parents have to be US citizens to be considered a Natural Born citizen. (Emer de Vattel “Law of Nations”). Candidates will have to show a valid original SSN and a valid original long form birth certificate with the name of the doctor, hospital and signatures.
Please, pay attention. This first bill at unveiling is not expected to deal with the status of current presidency, but will remove from future consideration others, who had alliagence to other Nations at birth.
Date set for unveiling of birthright citizenship bill
By Jeremy Duda
Published: December 28, 2010 at 8:30 pm
Rep. John Kavanagh (File Photo)
The 2011 legislative session will begin a few days early for two Arizona lawmakers who will be in Washington D.C. for the unveiling of legislation intended to end birthright citizenship.
Immigration hawks Sen. Russell Pearce, the author of SB1070, and Rep. John Kavanagh will attend a Jan. 5 press conference at the National Press Club to introduce model legislation that aims to force the U.S. Supreme Court to weigh in on the longstanding interpretation of the 14th Amendment that grants citizenship to the U.S.-born children of illegal immigrants. Lawmakers from 14 states who plan to introduce the bill will attend as well.
Despite worries from the business community, lawmakers and others that the controversial proposal will turn the Legislature’s attention from more important issues, such as the budget and the economy, Kavanagh said he doesn’t expect the birthright-citizenship bill to be a distraction.
“The budget and jobs will be the No. 1 priority, but we’ll still be able to deal with a lot of other important issues like illegal immigration,” the Fountain Hills Republican said.
Legislators in Alabama, Arizona, Delaware, Idaho, Indiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Texas and Utah plan to introduce birthright citizenship bills in 2011.
https://azcapitoltimes.com/news/2010/12/28/date-set-for-unveiling-of-birthright-citizenship-bill/
Comments
6 Responses to “Here we go! Act one: 14 states will unveil a bill, which will inerpret 14th amendment, as relating to children of citizens only. No more U.S. citizenship for children of illegal immigrants. Children will follow the status of their parents. Child of a tourist, is a tourist, child of an illegal is an illegal, even if born on U.S. soil. States have to protect themselves or go bankrupt. States are fighting back against the globalist cartel, which is robbing this nation blind”
Leave a Reply
December 31st, 2010 @ 6:48 pm
Won’t withstand legal challenge. The Fourteenth Amendment has been interpreted, and these bills clash with that interpretation. Only a constitutional amendment can achieve what these proposals aim to do, so Russell Pearce better start hopping on lobbying Congress to propose such amendment and lining three quarters of the states to ratify it.
January 1st, 2011 @ 9:54 am
Which way are you going? If 3/4 of the States call for a Constitutional Convention to pass a revised 14th Amendment then you are opening up the door for anything and everything to be passed by the Constitional Convention which a lot of people would probably support. Would this be a good idea or should congress pass a revised 14th amendment and have it ratified
by 3/4 of the States. A Constitution Convention would sure scare the Hell out of Congress because you never know what would come out of the Constitutional convention..
January 1st, 2011 @ 10:14 am
This is a start but it needs to be taken to another level which requires that all candidates for positions that involve access to classified information must pass a security background check for the highest classification level involved. Either get serious about our political representatives, judges, etc. being honorable individuals or quit wasting your time complaining about corruption; politicians and whoever are only corrupt because We the People allow it.
January 1st, 2011 @ 2:54 pm
Steve – of course, you’re right. They could do away with the second amendment. And while they’re at it, they could fiddle with the “natural born Citizen” clause.
And if theY called a Constitutional Convention it wouldn’t be filled with the tax resisters who operated a play continental congress in late 2009, and then scattred to the four winds when they heard the revenuers had infiltrated.
But it’s not going to happen. There are not enough secessionist states and most people think we should keep the United States since it is still the greatest country in the world.
January 1st, 2011 @ 4:30 pm
Hey, Steve, there is a Congressman in Utah, Rep. Brad Daw, urging a constitutional convention. All you need is to persuade the Utah Legislature and 74 more. Never, since 1787, has there been enough support to call a convention.
On the other hand, 27 amendments have been ratified.
So get moving on the repeal of the Fourteenth Amendment!
January 1st, 2011 @ 5:59 pm
it is not being repealed. Simply 14th amendment did not envision citizenship for children of illegal aliens